Have women always been far less ethnocentric than men or is it a very modern trend? Did historical writers record something like this

>>17765752 (OP)
It's a recent trend. White anglo women tried to flip flop to the oppresed side and cuck white men (women are consensus based and understood state propaganda was against their men), realized they couldn't, and flipped back. Normally women are very ethnocentric until the defeat of their people, then they become slave submissive bunnies (unless they have the guts to kill themselves before).
All in all pretty creatures deserving of contempt.

Those men had mothers

Behavior is highly genetic. Stop spreading your legs for thugs

>>17765788
No thanks, I'm THUGMAXXING rn

>>17765809
remember you voted for it

>>17765752 (OP)
>>17765762
>>17765788
>>17765809
>>17765817
That's an Asian and I knew this thread would become about White people somehow.

Bleach mudbunnies
Bleach ricebunnies
Bleach sandbunnies
Bleach tacobunnies

>>17765752 (OP)
she's got a point ya know
we always go all "muh black thugs/muh mudslime rapist/muh white pedo," not realizing they are almost always caused by xy chromos

>>17766292
Damn it is almost like biological sex and gender roles are real and not just social abstractions. Literally every culture creates violent biomen, therefore sex is hard-coded biological fact and trannies are just insane mentally ill retards.

>>17766292
Why are women so weak? Maybe they need to get good

>>17765752 (OP)
Most interracial pairings I see irl are White Man/Hispanic Female