atheists or atheism might die as the meme it is but I will never let them live it down, by keeping on pretending to take it seriously.

It is indeed my opinion that god doesn't exist. As such, I am not going to pretend he does. Have a good day!

>>17771548 (OP)
Atheism died the moment they went broke

Evolution is an empirical fact. Sola scriptura fags are mentally challenged.

>>17771548 (OP)
Religious scholars do take atheism quite seriously, both as a philosophical position and as a phenomenon. By saying that you do not take atheism seriously, you are implicitly dismissing the work of your own religion's intellectual heavyweights.

>>17771559
The retardation only exists because of a lack of alternative for creationism.

>>17771560
I'm one of those, I do take atheism seriously, I do not see the existence of atheists, people who identify as one, as irrational, but completely understandable, from an emotional point of view.
Not their pretentious intellectualism. That's where it gets into sigma meme territory.

>>17771563
Pajeetanon, I didn't know you're a YEC. That's funny.

>>17771566
>Not their pretentious intellectualism.
You mean like new atheist shit? Yeah that's comical, but in terms of actual philosophy, both theist and atheist philosophers are respectable and produce good arguments imo.

friendly reminder this anon exposed himself as a pajeet that embarressed himself despite years of posting facebook tier shit like his op pic

>>17771577
Again, you don't have be on guard, atheism is an emotional stance, they don't have a single purely rational argument and I'm not gonna get on my high horse and dismiss it as one, emotions are not irrational, but I'm also not gonna pretend emotions over rationality is not ultimately irrational.
I already said I understand the existence of atheists. People are just people man, like animals from a bird's point of view. We can't help but be what we are. Be dumb or different.

>>17771592
Source?

>>17771598
Then you are actually dismissing the work of your religion's scholars (if you do subscribe to a religion) given that unlike you, they do take the arguments of atheist philosophers seriously.

>>17771607
he made some thread a while ago where he claimed to "btfo" some random fedora youtuber, of course people actually listened to it and from the accent alone they instantly knew he was Indian, along with realizing he was likely autistic

>>17771608
You're getting into appeal to authority fallacy and pop culture territory.
Talk as you are.
Also, they probably hold the same sentiment I did, might is right. And God is almighty.

>>17771617
>You're getting into appeal to authority fallacy
Appeal to an actual authority isn't fallacious, and in any case I'm not even strictly doing that - I am simply saying that you are dismissing these scholars, not that they are correct.
>and pop culture territory
Academic philosophy is not pop culture.
>might is right
You are equivocating on the term "right". The "right" in "might is right" refers to moral oughts, not propositional truth.
>they probably hold the same sentiment I did
They mostly don't.

>>17771563
The alternative is guided evolution. God made the universe and the natural laws that govern it, including the evolutionary process. I don't know why this is so hard for fundamentalist christians while catholics, famous for burning people at the stake, got it right.

>>17771683
>The alternative is retardation, what are you gonna do about it?

>>17771683
Lots of Catholics don't believe in evolution, it's just that there's no dogma concerning evolution or lack thereof, so many end up believing in evolution, especially in first world countries.

>>17771548 (OP)
You are Indian

>>17772341
>Can't even ad hominem properly due to double fallacy.
Wheezing.

>>17771567
>>17771612
There should be a lying fallacy.

>>17772512
we saw your thread where you revealed your voice, which is funny because you were so boostful in that, only for it to backfire when most started mocking you

>>17772517
That doesn't undo your lying though, how old are you faggos anyways?

>>17772532
>how old are you faggos anyways?
This is really funny considering the gif you just posted. You being an Indian is also not a lie.

>>17772539
I'm born in Myanmar, raised in India, belonging to neither ethnic group.
What's that supposed to bring yo the table besides your deceptive cope?
>This is really funny considering the gif you just posted.
That's literally your reaction doe.

>We did it reddit! We laughed at him!

>>17772560
>I was raised in India, live in India, but I'm not an Indian!
You're being silly.
>That's literally your reaction doe.
And now you're being childish.

is op delusional

atheism is on the rise while theism is on decline lol

the only places where you can still trick people into your jew cult is africa. because you blackmail them with food.

>>17772710
The death of atheism isn't gonna be like paganism, it's more so simply dropping the act.

>>17772738
Not being able to fathom that people genuinely hold different beliefs than you is a sign of low iq.