>"personal relationship with Jesus"

Nothing in the world is more important to me than my personal relationship with Jesus Christ.

>>17776233
Who's the bottom? I bet it's you, you dirty little bitch. Bet there's no condom too. You take Jesus' love as deep inside you as possible and thank him every time.

>>17776229 (OP)
Yes. Skip churchianity and go straight towards the Lord.

>>17776235
Have fun burning

>>17776233
No one can actually explain what it means, though. And it's completely unfalsifiable, by design.

>>17776233
>>17776236
More like parasocial relationship lel. Your "personal relationship" is the religious equivalent of reading a book and thinking this makes you best buds with the author.

>>17776245
>it's completely unfalsifiable

>>17776252
What does it mean to have a "personal relationship with Jesus". Explain. What does it look like.

>>17776256
It means you have faith in Him, you pray to Him and contemplate His glory, you know He watches over you, and He loved you and gave Himself for you.

>>17776262
How is that a personal relationship? Personal relationship means mutual and with equal interaction. >>17776246

>>17776272
Ok, now read the second half of the sentence

>>17776275
>you know He watches over you, and He loved you and gave Himself for you.

Do you "know" that because Jesus personally told you that, or because the Bible tells you so?

>>17776252
>wanting evidence is... LE ATHEIST FEDORA CRINGE!!!

>>17776277
Jesus loves me this I know for the bible tells me so :)

>>17776280
>I am a child

You keep a man in your heart? Gay.

Christianity is extremely gay the more you think about it. Men staring at Jesus’s ripped abs on the cross every Sunday.

Wow.

>>17776229 (OP)
>Personal relationship with The Father

>>17776297
They also call themselves "the bride of christ"

Lmao

>>17776297
>cumgutter status?
>sick
>same time next week?
>yes

>>17776298
Not possible without a relationship with Jesus.

>>17776305
That's not what Jesus said. He said
>No one comes to the Father, except through me
But the Father can still come to you, should he so choose. As he did with Adam, Noah, Melchizedek, Abraham, Moses, Jacob, Elijah, Mary, etc.
It's a "we'll call you" situation.

>>17776324
The way the Father comes to you is by drawing you to the Son.

>>17776325
Confused Christbot defaults to his programmed response.

>>17776325
The Father will come to you with or without The Son, in as much as such a thing is possible within the Trinity. It wasn't Jesus or the Holy Spirit that spoke to any of those whom I listed. It wasn't The Son who appeared before Moses and commanded him to not look at His Face. The Father directly communed with these people with no intermediaries. As is His Right.

>>17776334
Actual fedorabot

>>17776341
>The Father will come to you with or without The Son, in as much as such a thing is possible within the Trinity
It's not possible, see 1 John 2:23
>It wasn't Jesus or the Holy Spirit that spoke to any of those whom I listed. It wasn't The Son who appeared before Moses and commanded him to not look at His Face.
Actually it was, see John 1:18. You're making an assumption based in part on a polytheistic misinterpretation of the Trinity.

>>17776342
Not an atheist. It's very telling that this is your only response. You use it a lot.

>>17776350
>Actually it was, see John 1:18
>using the new testament to prove itself

>>17776357
The bible is self-authenticating.

>>17776362
The Quran also has lots of proof of its own legitimacy, so does the Talmud. And every other religious text

>>17776371
OK

>>17776374
Seethe

>>17776350
>John 2:23
Justify it, preferably with quoted interpretations from church fathers. Otherwise this is a non-sequitur.
>You're making an assumption
No assumption made on my part at all.
You, however, have just made a bad faith assumption about my interpretation of the Trinity. I even anticipated this, which is why I included a disclaimer in the final clause of the first sentence of my post to refute such a claim.

>>17776324
Hebrews 1:1-2

>>17776380
>>John 2:23
No, sir, 1 John 2:23, the first epistle of John, not the Gospel.
>You, however, have just made a bad faith assumption about my interpretation of the Trinity. I even anticipated this, which is why I included a disclaimer in the final clause of the first sentence of my post to refute such a claim.
The Father is not the 'real' God and the other persons lesser beings, nor is He 'over here' doing His thing, and the Son 'over there' doing His thing. The Father and the Son are one God. See John 12:44-45

>>17776303
KEK

>>17776305
They are the same guy, retard

>>17776396
The Father and the Son are distinct co-eternal persons.

>>17776405
>The Father and the Son are distinct co-eternal persons.

>B-But there's still only one God! Somehow!! I am still a monotheist!!
>one God three essences or something!

>>17776392
>The Father is not the 'real' God and the other persons lesser beings, nor is He 'over here' doing His thing, and the Son 'over there' doing His thing.
I never remotely implied any of this, and not only did I explicitly provide words and assurances to dissuade you from making such an assumption, I also explicitly directed your attention to it... something which you're replying to right now.
You have no excuse for simply talking past me. If you aren't going to engage with the words I write, I won't waste any more of my time on this pretense of a discussion. Have a nice day, anon.

>>17776229 (OP)
this could be you anon

>>17777277
checked, praise the lord

>>17776235
/thread

>>17776233
God bless you

>>17776233
enjoy menial spirituality

>>17777277
I'm good, I already grew up with a dad.

>>17776233
>hearing voices in his head
>seeing things that aren't there
You're literally a fucking schizo, take your fucking meds before we have to put you down

>>17776245
so is someone's love for their mother
does that make it not real?

>>17777823
>so is someone's love for their mother
I can explain why I love my mother. My mother has tangibly, observably been in my life since the very beginning of it. And in early childhood she protected and helped me in many tangible ways.

>>17777822
atheist said the quiet part out loud...

>>17776235
The bible describes Christians as God's daughter, bride, and slave, and describes Jesus as a brother to Christians so Anon is Jesus' daughter-sister slave-wife.

>>17776229 (OP)
Jesus dick inside me, coooming aaah aaaaaaaaaaah

>>17776297
well that's what happened when it was rebranded from the gay romans gods. look at the gay as fuck statues, even in their myths.

>>17776233
Based