>”The Jews killed Jesus.”
Um, no? Actually the Romans killed Jesus. Why don’t you persecute the descendants of Rome aka Italians, Spanish, Portuguese, Brits, French, Greeks, Turks, Germans, & Romanians, instead of Jews?

Didn’t Pontius Pilate in, Matthew 27:25, wash his hands in blood and said, “ Let Jesus' blood be on us Romans and on our Roman children!”??


The New Testament accounts state that Roman soldiers were responsible for the literal act of nailing Jesus to the cross. While the chief priests and elders of the people plotted to kill Jesus, it was Roman soldiers who carried out the execution. The book of Acts also mentions that under God's sovereignty, "both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel" were responsible for Jesus' death.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Acts 4:27-28:
This passage states that both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, were responsible for Jesus' death.
Mark 15:24:
This passage explicitly describes the Roman soldiers as nailing Jesus to the cross.
Matthew 27:2-3:
This passage describes the chief priests and elders of the people delivering Jesus to Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor.
Luke 23:39:
This passage mentions that the Roman soldiers were responsible for carrying out the crucifixion.

Are you and the Mary poster ever gonna fuck

>>17779819 (OP)
Jews are the traitors of the white race, they deserve to burn along with all the shit skins. Jesus agrees (Luke 19:27) that all jews need to be slain.

>>17779832
>the magical flying jew does not like other jews
oh wow. Convincing stuff.

>>17779833

>>17779819 (OP)
Your premise is wrong from the start. You shouldn't persecute anyone for the sins of their fathers.
Deuteronomy 24:16
>The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.

>>17779839
Jesus didn't say that

>>17779819 (OP)
Uh no Saint Paul plainly states that the Jews are the people who killed Jesus Christ

So now you have went on to denying the infallibility of the Gospel to please the Jews

>>17779819 (OP)
the bible says the jews ordered the death of jesus and that the blood of jesus is on the jews and their children for all time

>>17780865
>Uh no Saint Paul plainly states that the Jews are the people who killed Jesus Christ
Saint Paul the Roman? Saint Paul, the guy who never knew Jesus in life?

>>17779819 (OP)
Their unemployment rates are good enough punishment already.

>>17780916
>no true scotsman
it is wise to shun the jew, their beliefs create the justification for their condemnation.

>>17780916
I'm not really sure what the point of the thread is since you don't believe the Gospels are true

>>17781071
It’s Jewish Kevetching.
The Jews said plainly that Jesus’s blood was on their hands and the hands of their children. Romans washed their hands of the affair and didn’t even want to do it. It’s like condemning a guillotine blade for beheading someone instead of the guy who orchestrated the beheading.

>>17779819 (OP)
>Why don’t you persecute the descendants of Rome aka Italians, Spanish, Portuguese, Brits, French, Greeks, Turks, Germans, & Romanians, instead of Jews

“Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.” And they divided up his clothes by casting lots

>>17781123
How do blood curses work exactly? 99% of Jews alive at the time weren't anywhere near that building, and any Jews born after had even less to do with it. Can I just declare a blood curse on England and our descendants and it comes true?

>>17779832
>>17779839
>>17780951
>>17781123
Glowniggers aren't even trying anymore

>>17779819 (OP)
Did you forget the part where the Pharisees were demanding for his death, while Pontius Pilate didn't see any reason to kill Jesus?
>>17779832
>Jews are the traitors of the white race
Nice try glowie/pol shit stirrer.

>>17779819 (OP)
When the world demands that we speak falsely about the faith, we are required to speak the truth; when the world demands that we speak truthfully about the faith, but neglect certain truths, then it is those very truths the world tells us to ignore that we must profess all the more loudly.
Satan, although he is the father of lies, does not always lie; where it is possible to do so, it is often far more effective to mislead with the truth — to lie by omission. This is what the world so often demands of Christians today.
If the world says we must call slavery sin, then we affirm that Scripture does not call slavery sin and even commands it in places. If the world says we must tolerate homosexuality or false religions, then we affirm that Scripture condemns such things as abomination. If the world tells us that it is fine to say that our sins crucified Christ, that the Romans crucified Christ, and that Pilate crucified Christ, but that we must not say that the Jews murdered Christ, then we affirm in no uncertain terms that the Jews murdered Christ.
There are no optional parts of Scripture - we, as Christians, are required to affirm the full counsel of God. To deflect with an irrelevant truth is no less a lie than an affirmative false statement. Whether you are fated to be a confessor or a martyr is in God's hands, but it is in your hands to decide whether you will follow God or yield to the world.
There is no promise of salvation for those who apostatize by denying the Word of God. If I profess with the loudest voice and the clearest exposition every portion of the truth of God except precisely that little point which the world and the devil are at that moment attacking, I am not confessing Christ, however boldly I may be professing Christianity. Where the battle rages, there the loyalty of the soldier is proved, and to be steady on all the battlefield besides is mere flight and disgrace to him, if he flinches at that one point. St Martin Luther

>>17781525
>>17781541
stfu, jew. everyone is tired of your bullshit

>>17779819 (OP)
Because the Romans converted to Christianity and its descendants spread the gospel you disgusting fucking kike. You are cursed spawn and killed the messiah. I hope your rat hole in TEL Aviv gets bombed by the persians you filth

>Antisemites worshipping a Jewish apocalyptic prophet and a Jewish war god.

>>17781766
trying to redefine christianity as noahdism is bullshit, jew. kys already

Nope!

There were no Roman legions stationed in Judea at the time of Christs crucifixion. Legionaries from Italy would not be stationed in Judea until after the Second Jewish Revolt that happened a couple centuries after Christ died.

All the soldiers responsible for Christ’s crucifixion were local auxiliaries.

The only Romans from Rome proper, was Pontius Pilate who wanted to spare Christ and washed his hands of the situation, his wife who had a dream about Christ and wanted Pilate to show mercy, and a Centurion who asked for Christ and displayed faith greater than all of Israel.

So try again kike. It was the Jews who agitated for the death of Christ, and locals who carried out the execution.

>>17780408
So you agree the Jews did not kill jesus

do you spam this in hopes that lurkers see the headline and just go with it?

>>17779819 (OP)
>Didn’t Pontius Pilate in, Matthew 27:25, wash his hands in blood and said, “ Let Jesus' blood be on us Romans and on our Roman children!”??
Pontius Pilate doesn't speak in 27:25, you're thinking of "all the people", referring to the "multitude" persuaded by the chief priests and the elders to destroy Jesus

>>17779819 (OP)
The Sanhedrin demanded His death (Matt 26:65–66), and cried, “His blood be on us and our children!” (Matt 27:25).
No one is innocent. Also remember this:
>For you, brothers, became imitators of the churches of God in Christ Jesus that are in Judea. For you suffered the same things from your own countrymen as they did from the Jews, who both killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out, and displease God and oppose all mankind.” — 1 Thessalonians 2:14–15

>>17781881
>The only Romans from Rome proper, was Pontius Pilate who wanted to spare Christ and washed his hands of the situation, his wife who had a dream about Christ and wanted Pilate to show mercy, and a Centurion who asked for Christ and displayed faith greater than all of Israel.
This is all fanfiction. The best we can tell, Pontus Pilate ordered the execution for Jesus as he was claiming to be King of the Jews.

>>17781982
>The Sanhedrin demanded His death (Matt 26:65–66), and cried, “His blood be on us and our children!”
And there are people stupid enough to believe this actually happened.

>>17781996
Both the Gospel and the Talmud have the similar stories. Both are hostile towards each other.

>>17782001
> Both the Gospel and the Talmud have the similar stories.
That doesn’t mean it actually went down that way. All these stories were written down decades after it happened.

>>17782012
Why do the Jews BRAG that they crucified (or hung him on a tree), justifying that he broke Torah?
Remember >>17779819 (OP) is using the Bible as his source.

antisemites are minions of the devil

>>17782590
What are you talking about? According to Judaism, the Devil is NOT evil.

>>17782599
according to them the devil is the evil inclination. They do believe in evil and people can be evil and the devil is the expression of that evil.

>>17782599
nice try lying antisemite, Jews dont believe in the devil as a being at all.
See you people are intrinsically evil

>>17779819 (OP)
>Didn’t Pontius Pilate in, Matthew 27:25, wash his hands in blood and said, “ Let Jesus' blood be on us Romans and on our Roman children!”??
That's not what Matthew 27:25 says. Verse 25 tells us what the crowd shouted out, while verse 24 tells us what Pilate said. Try not to get the two confused as you seem to have done. See the two verses in context below:

"When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.
Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children." (Matthew 27:24-25)

>>17781449
they made a pact with satan

There are 3 possible positions you can have on Jesus:
>1) The concept of the Jewish messiah is real and Jesus is that messiah
>2) The concept of the Jewish messiah is real but Jesus is not that messiah
>3) The concept of the Jewish messiah is not real

Its not coincidence that all three of those positions are represented in those responsible for Jesus's death (Judas, Jews, Romans). Its a neat bit of narrative flourish that means no-one gets to go >well he didn't die for *my* sins. Of course Christcucks are too stupid to notice one of the best bits of storytelling in their own holy book and just go hurr its the Jews.

>>17782621
Then wtf is going on in the Book of Job?
I thought the standard Jewish position was that Satan exists and is subordinate to God.

>>17782621
You are a jew, servant of the devil, enemy of God and an enemy of his Son.

Your religion exists because Jesus said your branch of the tree is not the entire tree, so you killed him and began to try to kill the rest of the tree.

Only the most harsh condemnations are appropriate for followers of talmud jew religion. Go wander the desert and follow the laws of your exile like a true jew. You are no jew, you are a lying and murderous spawn of the devil.

>>17779819 (OP) Actually no one killed Jesus, since God wouldn't allow a innocent to pay for the sins of others. The perspective of your ancestors told them that Jesus was crucified, but that's not what happened. You can read about it in the Quran.

https://quranenc.com/en/browse/english_saheeh

>>17779819 (OP)
>the guns kill those kids, not the mentally ill MkUltra victim