Thread 17782148

How do neo-pagans solve the Trilema of the Chirstian conquest of Europe?

>Option 1: Christianity defeated paganism because the pagan gods are weaker than the Christian God and he defeated them.
>Option 2: The pagan gods could have defeated Christianity but chose not to do so, even when their followers were being killed and forcibly converted and their places of worship either destroyed or turned into churches. Which means they didn't care about their followers and their suffering.
>Option 3: Christianity defeated paganism and conquered Europe and the pagan gods couldn't do anything about it because they don't exist.

None of these options seem particularly viable for neo-paganism today.

>>17782148 (OP)
neo-pagans don't actually believe in any of their gods. they worship their skin color first and foremost, their paganism is just an extension of that. their only gripe with christianity is that it originated as an offshoot of judaism. so by their logic, all european history after christianization is actually jewish history

>Christianity in North Africa is extinct
>Christianity in the Middle East is more or less limited to a dwindling number of ethno-religions that don't even form a majority in Lebanon let alone more than 10% of the population in any other ME country
Crusade when kek

>>17782158
No one's talking about Christianity here, we're talking about paganism. Stay on topic if you want to post in this thread.

You just made this thread.

>>17782161
All things considered I suspect Islam is a much greater threat to Christianity than the larpagans are or the actual pagans ever were

>>17782173
Cool. No one's talking about Islam vs Christianity.

>>17782148 (OP)
>>17782154
It would've been cool if they did. Like oh maybe the gods retreated because of some kind of karmic punishment? Nope nobody cares.

>>17782178
>Like oh maybe the gods retreated because of some kind of karmic punishment?
Funnily enough that was the Christian argument for why post-Roman Britain was overrun by the pagan Anglo-Saxons

>>17782178
Anyway probably Option 2 it'd be most in character with deities in general.

>>17782181
Yeah

>>17782161
You can learn about people by considering parallel phenomena. The ways christians cope about the death of christendom is probably not dissimilar about the ways pagans cope.

>>17782200
>You can learn about people by considering parallel phenomena.
There's nothing to learn by shitfing the conversation to a different topic. Otherwise you'll derail the thread. I want to keep this focused on the pagans and their view of Christianity's victory over paganism in Europe.

>>17782148 (OP)
How would you feel when these arguments are applied to Jerusalem or Antioch or other holy sites overrun by arabs? By your logic allah is supreme.

>>17782210
>How would you feel when these arguments are applied to Jerusalem or Antioch or other holy sites overrun by arabs?
I'd feel perfectly fine with it, since I'm not a Christian. But I want to know how pagans account for THEIR failure.
>By your logic allah is supreme.
These days it seems like HaShem is supreme...

>>17782148 (OP)
Why does the idea of Whites worshiping White deities offend e-christian larpers so much?

>>17782218
You already made this thread and got answers from pagans.

>>17782269
Pathetic answers, I'm looking for something better.

>>17782154
>you worship skin color! let in more immigrants goy, its the christian thing to do!

>>17782161
its a valid point. how do you reconcile with the levites of your religion all having been slain, and your sacred temples destroyed? you have no priests, no legitimate inheritance, no cultural or blood connection to the culture you practice. you are a khazarian mockery of the israelites we once exterminated under the glory of Roma, a crude mockery of Judea's perfection. your rabbis are not priests and never will be, their teachings differ from the teachings of the ancient israelites

>>17782281
>how do you reconcile with the levites of your religion-
I'm not a Christian.

>>17782286
then why do you make this thread every week? whats your agenda here?

>>17782290
>then why do you make this thread every week?
I've literally only made one.
>whats your agenda here?
To see if paganism is a viable religious path today, or if Abrahamism is the only valid alternative.

>>17782178
we already had this thread, and the answer is that it doesn't make sense within the context of paganism that the Aesir would have stopped the process of conversion.

>>17782281
You are a mere shit skinned, shit haired, shit eyed descendant of Syrian golems we imported into Italy under Severus to racially bastardize our Roman enemies out of existence. You are not related at all to the with the Nordic Romans of old.

>>17782336
im not italian, but I can see that comment got under your skin, jew

>>17782268
None of these gods are "white" humans

>>17782342
Just stating facts, achmedo.

>>17782350
but they literally are though

>>17782375
What do you think a god is?

>>17782383
white

>>17782148 (OP)
You already made this thread and already got answers from both pagans and non-pagans
if you didn't like the ones you got that's your problem