Historically speaking, when did the alt right/white nationalist movement put so much emphasis on germanic blonde hair and blue eyes, as if such people are better than the rest of White people?

For starters, the greatest Europeans were non Germanic, Southern Europeans. I.e Caesar, Napoleon, Alexander, Aristotle, Plato, Socrates, Pythagoras, Galilei, DaVinci, Michelangelo, and so on.

And the greatest “Germanics” were the *least* Germanic of them all: Southern German (Half Celtic), British, Swiss, Austrian… and many were BROWN eyed and/or DARK haired.
I.e: Hitler (Austrian, Dark Haired), Beethoven (Southern German, Swarthy), Shakespeare (dark eyes, dark hair), Nietzsche (dark hair), Martin Luther (dark eyes, dark hair), HP Lovecraft (dark eyes, dark hair), Pasteur (dark hair) and so on.

Even some of the most famous germans in history are actually jewish, like Marx or Einstein.

Any nordicist care to explain?

It just represents the hollow superficiality of the movement, they are nothing more than pinterest girls at this point.

never actually existed. Its the spic/wop/wog/dago/jeet/greek/ricecel stereotype of white people.
They seethe at Dolph Lundgren and Brad Pitt guys for being handsome.

Anyone that seethes at "nordicism" is a perpetual seether and butthurt at looks.

Usually irl its ugly little potato faced plastic paddies pushing the blue eye blonde thing anyway or slavs.

Who set you off this time OP?

>>17792590 (OP)
Blonde hair, blue eyes, and an aryan athletic build; were seen as a sign of genetic purity and pure beauty.

While, even the biggest right/white nationalists will concede that "genetic purity" is not always there, even when it comes to great Germanic heroes.

I mean, Hitler himself is the biggest example. He promoted blond hair and blue eyes as the elite leaders of society and had neither himself.

Friedrich Nietzsche is another great example of a revered Germanic ideal, who had dark hair and eyes.

I think it was more a preferred aesthetic thing rather than a hard requirement for Germanic greatness.

>>17794547
>This thing that I believe in doesn’t exist
>>17794548
>Afraid to engage with the argument
>>17794555
>”Why is X an ideal?”
>Because X is an ideal

Behold, the power of the superior germanix intellect

>>17794577
Genuine nordicentrism is a fringe belief not even actual "nords" believe in much anymore, which begs the question as to why you felt it necessary to create a thread to 'dunk' on their beliefs.

Which - given the large number of mentally ill browns on this board in general - means the most likely scenario is you've taken particular offense at a nordicentric shitpost in another thread, and have decided to make a thread to passive-aggressively seethe about it (much like a woman would).

>>17794555
Ironically Paul Newman who was the quintessential blonde haired blue eyes athletic man and likened to a greek god.
Was a jew.

>>17794590
Why are you trying to gaslight me like a woman?
It is quite obvious to anyone in the right that there is a blonde and blue eyed worship going on. They don’t have to outright claim to be nordicists, do you think anyone who posts the “A10” meme is claiming to be a nordicist? Do you think anyone who makes jokes (but really mean it) about Italians and other Southern Europeans not being “White”, or if they are, then they’re not on “their level”, is claiming to be a nordicist? You are retarded. I have to explain to you what you could’ve figured out if you weren’t too dumb to just look around.
There’s a clear hierarchy.

>>17792590 (OP)
Maybe because this “Nordic” features hardly appear outside Europe? You can find dark haired and swarthy people all over the world so they’re too inclusive of a features to fixate around. While blond hair and blue eyes are more of an exclusive look that can be pinpointed to a narrower region.

>>17796177
It's still retarded, why would having one hair color instead of another make you ''superior''? Might as well postulate that bald people are more intelligent than non bald people, it's the same level of completely arbitrary nonsense

Some of the greatest geniuses who ever lived had dark hair, that doesn't mean that dark hair made them geniuses, it's a complete non sequitur

>>17796258
It's just a beauty ideal. Not living up to it doesn't mean it's mutually exclusive to other ideals.
>the ideal german body should be strong and athletic
>the ideal german mind should be inquisitive and analytical
>the ideal german hair should be blonde and the eyes should be blue
That's not saying that dark haired people can't be smart or are automatically dumb, they just don't happen to live up to one beauty ideal.

>>17792590 (OP)
>Why does the strawman against Nordicism make no sense
Because it's a strawman? I haven't meant any Nordicists who claim Austrians and North Italians aren't white

>>17796325
*met any

>>17796177
>Hardly appear outside
Yet they do. When you claim a FEATURE makes someone the “ideal” then you’re saying that a blonde/blue eyed NON WHITE is superior (more ideal) than a dark haired/eyed WHITE person.

It is ultimately a low IQ move, to focus on a few alleles, instead of *populations*.

>>17796325
Your post is so ironically retarded I’ll assume you’re trolling

>>17796425
Give one example of a Nordicist who claims Austrians are not white

>>17796298
>Beauty ideal
Are you a woman?

>>17796426
Give me one reason why should I engage with your retarded non sequitur.

>>17796427
No, why is that a relevant question? You do realize that beauty ideals exist for both genders right?

>>17796429
Acknowledge your post is a strawman then. Nordicists DO consider Austrians and North Italians white

>>17796433
Why are you pretending white nationalists don’t purity spiral and place hierarchies among Whites regarding hair and eye color? It is not “just a beauty ideal”, claiming so is low level gaslighting.
Gaslighting and caring about hair color as beauty ideals is such a feminine thing, maybe that’s why we are going extinct, you’re all retarded.

>>17796434
Acknowledge your post as a moron’s misinterpretation of my post. I didn’t claim they didn’t.
You’re not making a convincing argument for me to keep engaging with your posts, the way you can’t keep up with basic logical argumentation tells me you’re either low IQ or disingenuous, probably both.

>>17796438
>Why are you pretending white nationalists don’t purity spiral and place hierarchies among Whites regarding hair and eye color?
Like a beauty ideal where one combination is considered more desirable than others?
>It is not “just a beauty ideal”, claiming so is low level gaslighting.
Gaslighting and caring about hair color as beauty ideals is such a feminine thing, maybe that’s why we are going extinct, you’re all retarded.
The most feminine thing in this thread is you, because of your misuse of that word.

>>17796442
So if Nordicists consider these groups white then what are you complaining about?
It just seems like pointless bitching to me

>>17792590 (OP)
>Napoleon
?

>>17796446
No, retard. These hierarchies are about general superiority, not just aesthetic.

>>17796450
Because they consider these groups as inferior? Is that so hard for you to grasp? Are you happy being part of a club that considers you inferior to them? Then I guess you are the bitch.

>>17796465
In what way are Austrians discriminated against within the white nationalist community? Give an example of this alleged discrimination.

>>17792590 (OP)
Because of lack of melanin and because it correlated to ancestry from Northern Europe.

>>17796452
The Vikernes’s blonde, it is either “nordic blonde” or “swarthy brown” whenever it benefits them.

>>17796459
Physical appearance is one aspect of superiority. Where are these hordes of white supremacists that think that hair pigmentation has a direct correlation with IQ? Never in my life have I seen anyone make that argument. Blonde hair and blue eyes are just held as an ideal, probably a leftover from Nazi propaganda and from what >>17796177 said, it's an easy way to separate people with obvious European ancestry from the rest of the world.

>>17796469
People associated Austria with the East in the past or associated with the Balkans

>>17796469
So you agree that Southern Europeans are discriminated against, but is just disingenuously trying to avoid it? I found it hilarious that you just dropped the “North Italians” and went for “Austrians” because you know the former have a lot of rejection still.

>>17796479
But that's not a contemporary example. What contemporary white nationalists want to exclude or discriminate against Austrians?

>>17796477
>Where are these hordes of white supremacists that think that hair pigmentation has a direct correlation with IQ?
Clearly you haven’t been around many white nationalist circles. Stop wasting my time, you don’t even know what the consensus is.

>>17796483
Because you used both Austrians and North Italians in your post as examples of brown-haired peoples whose civilizational contributions aren't acknowledged. I disagreed this was the case, especially as I have never even seen anti-Austrian sentiment from Nordicists.
With regard to Italians obviously it's a different matter as most can agree Italians are not a monolith. Same thing with regard to the French.

>>17796484
>Nordicists purity spiral and place Southern Europeans lower in their hierarchy of genetic superiority
>You, a retard: “Oh yeah? Then tell me which white supremacists discriminate against AUSTRIANS? Huh? Don’t have an answer?”

Lol

>>17796483
>>17796489
What I suspect you are really complaining about is that Southern Italians and Spaniards aren't considered to be white, but you are engaging in a strawman by presenting historical examples of Austrians and Northern Italians to prove these groups are white, and then pretending as though you've debunked the former claim.

>>17796486
>make ridiculous claims
>provide no evidence
Great job buddy. Try bleaching your hair, that might increase your IQ.

>>17796486
>bluffing and full of hot air
You lost.

>>17796491
You're the one who brought up Austrians in your post. I was asking for evidence of discrimination against them. You have yet to provide it.

>>17796484
>>17796489
I'm just saying they were in the past because of more cultural ties to the East and having more Slavic DNA. Obviously not as much as a non-European.

The whole ideology was invented by a French cuck. Literally, the guy was a cuckold.

>In 1846, Gobineau married Clémence Gabrielle Monnerot. She had pressed for a hasty marriage as she was pregnant by their mutual friend Pierre de Serre who had abandoned her.

>>17796489
No, you idiot. I used Austrians PRECISELY because they are among the top ranks of Whites, according to nordicists, due to their Germanic blood. And it was to challenge the worship of light features, so I named several Northern Europeans who lacked these features. Seriously, if you didn’t get this from the get to it might be over for you.

>>17794756
newman was half jewish

>>17796505
Austrians have never been on the top of their hierarchy what are you talking about?

>>17796505
Ok, so your post is just pointless bitching then. We consider Austrians white, so clearly blonde hair isn't all that matters.

>>17796505
I actually agree with you in principle. When one analyzes race, they should care more about civilizational achievements than physical appearance.
This is why the Nazis considered East Slavs to be borderline subhuman, while they had a relatively positive view of Italians, Hungarians, and Croats.
There is a problem with the modern white nationalist movement in that it places too high a priority over North vs South distinctions rather than West vs East. But Pan-Europeanism is certainly not the solution, as this is just leftism on a continent-wide scale.

>>17796527
Really, it's only geniuses that actually drive anything though. Nationalism/race-based nationalism is a meme

>>17796473
He wasn't really blonde, but he had grey eyes.

Napoleon II was 100% nordic-passing, but unfortunately died very young.

>>17792590 (OP)
Like so many false presuppositions in this post.
1. alt right is a modern thing, it needed the mainstream right to be the cuck right to begin with. White nationalism also modern as american nationalism originally was understood to mean only whites since other races were considered foreign residents.
2. germanic blonde hair and blue eyes were only really cared about by hitler and the sources for that are pretty much anti war propaganda after all he wasn't putting brown haired people in jail or removing them from power
3. Greeks don't really cluster with whites moreso than people around their region like anatolians and lebanese. And historically lots of people have considered greeks non white. As with italians. It depends on who you ask but don't act like its never happened. Europeans have long respected the near east and middle east even before greek civilizations we had egypt and mesopotamia, phoenicia and persia, so on and so on. Didn't stop europeans from worshiping them.
4. Your list of greatest germanics is completely subjective. Even if this was something people cared about they could easily come up with some other metrics to justify it.
5. Well are they german or jewish? make up your mind.
If I had to answer this question at face value I'd say after the industrial revolution when its clear all their inventions managed to eclipse pretty much everything discovered by the earlier societies, many of which had regressions.
But seriously op I highly suggest you get off the internet as it is clear it is causing you brainrot.

>>17796493
You wouldn’t need to suspect anything if you could actually read. In the OP I explicitly talked about Southern Europeans.

>>17796511
Among the top =/= The top
Come back if you eventually break the 90 IQ barrier.

>>17796512
Do you consider Austrians superior to Norwegians? What about Greeks?

>>17796527
A lot of Europeans are divided merely by obsolete borders that do not represent the modern cultural divides. On a globalized world, a White man in London has more in common with a White man in New York, than he does with a non White man from the same city, let alone the same country.
The nation is it’s people. The people now live beyond the geographical definition of Europe.

>>17796577
Nordic literally means Northern are you retarded. Austria isn't Northern. They explicitly made an "Alpine race" for between Nordic and Mediterranean and they ranked them as Nord > Alpine > Med.

>>17796565
Even if he had light blue eyes he did not look like a Swede in the slightest. He looked very much Italic in his nose, facial features, etc.

>>17796569
>alt right is a modern thing, it needed the mainstream right to be the cuck right to begin with. White nationalism also modern as american nationalism originally was understood to mean only whites since other races were considered foreign residents.
Complete non sequitur

>germanic blonde hair and blue eyes were only really cared about by hitler
Lol, if anything Hitler was the one who DIDN’T care about it. It was Himmler’s thing. You know absolutely nothing about the most basic historical facts, why should I keep reading your post?

>>17796590
Who are you arguing with?

>>17792590 (OP)
Never. It's a strawman concocted by jews such as yourself. People thinking blondes are pretty =/= people thinking their dark haired cousin is subhuman.

>>17796604
Except that you consider Southern Europeans as inferior because they are “swarthy”. Man, you nordicist cucks argue like women, totally insincere.

>>17792590 (OP)
>Historically speaking, when did the alt right/white nationalist movement put so much emphasis on germanic blonde hair and blue eyes, as if such people are better than the rest of White people?
I assume you are also from the English-speaking world, anon. The English language is native to mostly northern European stock.

Racism is almost always just an excuse to believe that one's own group is superior, there's rarely more thought put to it.
And since we're talking from the perspective of northern European whites, they prioritized and venerated themselves over other white groups.

>>17796690
That would make sense if they venerated the British instead of Swedes and Germans.

>>17796604
its not jews its usually butthurt italian incels or brazilians.
An italian on pol told me he became a communist because he didnt have blonde hair and blue eyes.

>>17792590 (OP)
>Caesar, Napoleon, Alexander, Aristotle, Plato, Socrates, Pythagoras, Galilei, DaVinci, Michelangelo,
All were Nordic and unrelated to the mixed race shitskins now living in Southern Europe.


Beside the actual greatest Europeans are all Germanic: Nobel, Lavoisier, Von Bayer, Pasteur, Oppenheimer, Planck, Gauss, Euler, Newton, Riemann to name just a few.

>>17792590 (OP)
>>17794547
It's okay to be Brown if you're not in Auschwitz.

>>17797609
>greatest Europeans are all Germanic
>Oppenheimer
Terrible bait

>>17797598
Then how come you keep getting BTFO by these “brazilians”? It should be easy to debunk the argument instead of resorting to low IQ fallacies while ironically screeching about the OP being a fallacy. Why can’t you do it?

>>17794547
> Anyone that seethes at "nordicism" is a perpetual seether and butthurt at looks.
I don’t want to be that guy, but women will go with either phenotype of white person. Tall, dark, and handsome is a real preference (and by that I mean Italian type swarthy, not niggers).

>>17796512
Austrians are more related to Hungarians, who aren't even as Aryan as Indians, than to northern Germans.

>>17794547
What didn't exist? There are nordicists today still pushing it. What a dumb take.

>>17792590 (OP)
>For starters, the greatest Europeans were non Germanic, Southern Europeans. I.e Caesar, Napoleon, Alexander, Aristotle, Plato, Socrates, Pythagoras, Galilei, DaVinci, Michelangelo, and so on.
Lmao, See, I would give a very different list.

>>17797598
Why categorize it as "butthurt"?
Why would a white man that is not blonde and blue eyed side with white nationalists who are trying to push nordicism? That would be an irrational position to take.

>>17798404
Let's see anon's list

>>17794756
>blonde haired
You consider the dude in your pic as blonde? The fuck is wrong with your eyes?

Many Slavs have/had blonde hair blue eyes. Yet Hitler and the Nazis went after them.

>>17794547
Nordicism has existed since the late 18th century you retard.

>>17792590 (OP)
Nordicists were so delusional it may warrant a repetition on 4chan where there are a few brown third worlder wehraboos but they've been irrelevant in public discourse for three quarters of a century.
Historically it was a cope by (north) germgroids and to a lower extent Englishmen to hide "Celtic" origin of civilization and high culture in those regions as well as their mixed genetic imprint. Ironically the true nords in Scandinavia were much more skeptical about Nordic supremacism. Another irony is that it took its "mature" form as the exaggeration of a non-Nordic decadent fallen aristocrat (see >>17796501) who used nordic supremacism as a way to elevate himself above the local plebs while considering Belgium as the purest remnant of true aryanism.
Once again the current breed of nordicists in the 21st century, aside from a few thousand larpagans (say Varg), are non-Whites who idolize the most superficial signs. They think the lightest hair and eyes give hierarchical value among Whites in the same manner lighter features establish a hierarchy among Indians, spics, blacks and sea people.