Was it incel rage?

>>17798710 (OP)
More than likely economic factors since private central banks and the rich/ruling class like their power trip games with no regard to the harm causedcto poorer/working classes, so somebody got disgusted and hungry enough to send a message upstream in the form of an assassination

>somebody in the balkans does something violent
>its a serb

>>17798710 (OP)
It was polio rage.
Part of his motivation came from him suffering of polio, he wouldn't have lived long anyway

>>17798748
>socioeconomic factors

race of the shooter? Was is recorded at the time?

>>17798841
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archduke_Franz_Ferdinand_of_Austria#Assassination

Poor Serbian probably did not like his country ruled over by rich aristocratic Austrians

>a young man can't actually believe in something so much he would kill and die for
>there must be some base, immediate sexual reason behind it
Freudian thought and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

>>17799097

Read his wiki, he belonged to a club called "Young Bosnia" they probably been seething to kill the Archduke for a long time, and he sees the opputurnity and BANG he takes it,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavrilo_Princip#Joining_Young_Bosnia

>>17798915
The Austrians were more the face, it was the Hungarians who were the regressive nutjobs in the empire

>>17799097
Because not having sex precedes class-based or ideology-based identity

>>17800024
yeah, no. Lenin was married and had a mistress, Stalin was married several times, Mussolini was married and a known adulterer, Mao was married several times and a known adulterer. More confederate volunteers were married than union volunteers.
To think that sexual frustration leads to political extremism and being sexually active makes you uninterested in extreme politics is a modern cope and tries to pathologize political opponents.
There was way more terrorist action and extremist political thought in the early 20th century when like 85% of people were married by age 25.