>>17818232>muh rightsyou are a fat piece of human garbage beneath contempt.
your "rights" only exist because of national leaders who against their better judgement do not throw you into prison for life or murder you outright for being at the tard end of the bell curve.
>>17818336>words words wordsThat is a lot of cope.
ALL governments wield power and zero governments have real checks on power.
being "allowed" to criticize a leader is an illusion, it is only forbidden if doing so creates a problem.
It is not some watchword that needs to be protected.
>but what if the gubmint abuses meThey can do this regardless of whether or not youre "allowed" to criticize the party.
>>17818844see above The freedom to do something only exists because of the power structures which guarantee it, they can revoke it for any reason as is their right.
Furthermore, the idea you are espousing is responsibility, which is retarded because as we know, very irresponsible people are often in a nation.
I personally dont think animals should have rights, or foreign agents, or children, or women, or people who want an abstract idea of freedom at the expense of actual freedom.
We judge a tree by its fruits. the "freedom to do doesnt mean ill actually do it" crowd has produced totalitarian shitholes that self extinguished.
We should never ever fall for the delusion of "Suffrage" the most refined form of slavery ever again.