Thread 17820682

>be monarchy
>have the risk of dealing with a retard in control for decades while ignoring the plights of the common folk
>be democratic republic
>have to deal with greedy merchants/corporations pulling the strings of every elected officials despite the latter claiming things will finally change with their election
>be socialist dictatorship
>have to rely on the elites you're trying to overthrow to fund your revolution and then risk being killed for calling their retarded policies, retarded
>be fascist
>have to rely on a populist grifter(s) who build the economy around stealing shit from minorities and using the wealth they gain to enrich themselves all while the populous is used as cannon fodder for future conquests
Wtf am I supposed to subscribe to?

>>17820682 (OP)
>>have to rely on the elites you're trying to overthrow to fund your revolution and then risk being killed for calling their retarded policies, retarded
This doesn't happen if you just kill them. They can't take away your power once they give it to you.

>>17820682 (OP)
>Wtf am I supposed to subscribe to?
Why do you have to subscribe to one?

>>17820682 (OP)
>>have the risk of dealing with a retard in control for decades while ignoring the plights of the common folk
did this ever actually happen? when did the common folk legitimately suffer communal dissolution solely from mismanagement?

>>17820689
then you can wind up like China where the top party members become a new aristocracy that all intermarry and send their kids to the top schools that put them on a pipeline to being top party members. Look up the parents of President Xi.

There's also the issue that you are led by people who are totally unaccountable to the people and can do whatever retarded policies they want like zero covid and if you point out how retarded it is you get arrested or killed.

>>17820794
>who is George III
Nobody seriously wanted to crush their fellow Englishman but the King kept chimping out so there was little choice in the matter. Admiral Howe tried to broker a peace deal behind the King's back with Adams and Franklin

>>17821857
When did George III "chimp out" anon?

>>17820689
>They can't take away your power
they've done that lotsotimes. the guy they put in place starts to believe their press ministers' jabberings and has to be put down. probably with some specific probability.

>>17820682 (OP)
Read the fountainhead, you are your own salvation.

>>17821862
>"what? The colonists want some Parliamentary representation like the West Indies planters have? What's that? They want to keep the same local-representation with a Crown-appointed magistrate system they've had for literally a century but with some more leeway in setting taxes because agricultural crops are effected by yearly weather trends? Oh, so you're saying they'd like to deal directly with me, their sovereign, instead of a Parliament they have no representation with? Huh? You're telling me some of my finest generals, who have actually set foot on the continent and dealt directly with my subjects are also opposed to Parliament's overreach and think the colonies should have some say in their internal affairs? The same generals that just got done winning me the entire East Coast from New Brunswick to the Carolinas?"
>"what's this? A petition to me directly in 1774? Well, I - OOPS! *paper shredding nlises*
>"North! Howe! Ready the fleet! We're confiscating their powder."
Idk anon, you tell me

>>17821878
How is that chimping out anon?

>>17821901
I accept your concession.

>17821905
Obvious bot post

>>17821908
Nope. Now explain how it's chimping out. I know you only just found out about that term on your secret Internet clubhouse but do try.

>>17821942
>explain how denying Parliamentary recognition to your subjects just north of the West Indies while simultaneously affording those West Indies subjects full representation (20+ seats in Parliament) isn't a contradiction of the highest order
>explain how blockading Boston port and encamping the city with troops under Howe wasn't an overreactive chimpout
>your secret Internet clubhouse
I don't even want to know. I'm sure you're referring to reddit because it's painfully obvious you're a newfag who only found this board once you finally got internet access sometime in the 2020's

>>17820682 (OP)
> >be socialist dictatorship
> > have to rely on the elites you're trying to overthrow to fund your revolution and then risk being killed for calling their retarded policies, retarded
literally the least of the problems
the real problem is
> >have the risk of dealing with a retard in control for decades while ignoring the plights of the common folk
once again
and if you point out things are not quite that decent you get labels a counterrevolutionary and thrown in Gulag