>>17823194 (OP)>>17823603>>17824435>>17824259Fukuyama fucked up because he gave his essay a clickbait title and now everyone thinks "haha this retard thought there will be no conflict or anything interesting in the future".
This was not at all his point.
Fukuyama used Hegel's conception of history. Hegel believed that history (through the process of dialectic) moves towards greater and greater freedom of the human spirit. According to Fukuyama and many others, the Cold War aka Communism vs. Liberal Capitalism was the last example of this dialectic. However, this dialictic did not result in a synthesis, instead Capitalism just won.
So Fukuyama concluded that Liberal Capitalism represents the greatest possible freedom for the human spirit, and thus the end point of the Hegelian concept of history (progress towards greater freedom through dialectic). He didn't say that there will never be any conflict, just that new dialectics will represent regression towards less freedom.
He didn't even say that this end of history is a good thing, in the essay he kind of laments that this shitty system is the best (most free) we will get and that people who realize this will fall into a dispair as they will correctly see there is no hope for a better future.