>The British Delegation at the Treaty of Paris refused to pose for this portrait, leaving it unfinished and only showing the American Delegation
Portraits served documentarian purposes, so this would be the equivalent of politicians refusing press photos for an event. Why do you think they refused to pose for the painting?

>>17824009 (OP)
why didn't the artist finish the americans? this sounds like bullshit to me.

>>17824041
What's the point if the other side refuses to pose for the image?

>>17824045
They could have let their imagination fill the blank.
Here's a game, anons : let's draw our best seething britbong to finish the painting

>>17824009 (OP)
>Why do you think they refused to pose for the painting?
They were coping with the fact that the British monarchy was in the hands of a lunatic retard who led them into losing the greatest prize the British Empire ever held, all because he wouldn't give some Englishmen their due rights.

>>17825003
>aaaahhhhhh my loyal subjects are asking me to respect their basic rights as Englishmen aaaaahhhhh I need to bankrupt my country over this aaaahhhh
Forgot pic

>>17825003
>They were coping with the fact that the British monarchy was in the hands of a lunatic retard who led them into losing the greatest prize the British Empire ever held
You've got this all mixed up, India wasn't lost until 1947.

>>17825105
>nnnoooooo not our heckin' pajeets!!!
Is this really how britoids cope?