>>17826775>The "Talmud" isn't a book, it's over 140 fucking volumes of Rabbinic holy texts which also includes the Tanakh (The Christian Old Testament) I'm talking about the Babylonian Talmud obviously. Don't start playing your word games. Not one word of the Talmud had even been written in the First Century AD. Zero parts of it existed.
It has absolutely nothing to do with the ancient Jews, Biblical Israel, or any part of the Bible. The only possible reference one might hypothetically make is to the synagogue of Satan. That's it.
>I'm not reading any of your schizo nonesense.Stop trying to subvert other people with these lies, anon. If you lie like this, then whenever possible I'll expose the lie.
>>17826777The cult in question originated in Babylon in the Sassanid empire, in the middle ages. Later it spread to other pagan groups, who all started hallucinating that they were Jews -- ironically, none of them have any connection at all. It was an offshoot of gnosticism, which was widespread across the Middle East in late antiquity. There are similarities between the Babylonian Talmud and Manichaeism, such as the fact that they both use terms from 3 Enoch and are both dualist cosmologies. The Babylonian Talmud has literally nothing whatsoever to do with any part of the Bible, nor do those who follow it have a single thing to do with actual Israel or the actual Jews of the Bible.