Anonymous
7/8/2025, 9:34:09 PM No.17825776
Many self-described white nationalists, particularly those in the Anglosphere, and particularly Christians, advocate a view of history in which civilized light-skinned races engage in friendly collaboration to conquer or enslave uncivilized dark-skinned races, or else they get destroyed by the dark-skinned races in turn. This implies that different light-skinned races, whether Germanics, Czechs, East Slavs, or Jews, are effectively on the same 'team' in a constant struggle against the Third World. At least this is the view I see espoused by the BAP sphere and much of twitter. The /pol/ view is a bit different as they exclude Jews but otherwise keep the rest of the ideology the same.
The problem with this view is there's no basis for it historically or even contemporarily.
There's very little evidence dark-skinned people would have even ended up in Northern Europe if not for Jews, Slavs, and Germanics actively trying to sabotage one another. The Russians for example have no problem in the slightest in backing anti-imperialist, anti-colonialist, or desegregationist movements around the world so long as they hurt their hated enemy, the Anglo. The entire second half of the 20th century involves the Russians trying to destroy the Anglo-Saxon civilization, of which they were largely successful. A more modern example is Belarus deporting its migrants into Poland which in turn deports its migrants into Western Europe. Israel, too, which according to some is ostensibly a 'light-skinned' Western state, has no problem spending millions on resettling migrants into the West.
The way I see it, the 'dark-skinned' races are simply slaves used as pawns in a game of 'light-skinned' races attempting to destroy one another.
The problem with this view is there's no basis for it historically or even contemporarily.
There's very little evidence dark-skinned people would have even ended up in Northern Europe if not for Jews, Slavs, and Germanics actively trying to sabotage one another. The Russians for example have no problem in the slightest in backing anti-imperialist, anti-colonialist, or desegregationist movements around the world so long as they hurt their hated enemy, the Anglo. The entire second half of the 20th century involves the Russians trying to destroy the Anglo-Saxon civilization, of which they were largely successful. A more modern example is Belarus deporting its migrants into Poland which in turn deports its migrants into Western Europe. Israel, too, which according to some is ostensibly a 'light-skinned' Western state, has no problem spending millions on resettling migrants into the West.
The way I see it, the 'dark-skinned' races are simply slaves used as pawns in a game of 'light-skinned' races attempting to destroy one another.
Replies: