>>17831185Not him but virtue is good because it's effect is immediately observable. Imagine you are a food addicted obese smoker who loves sitting 16h a day playing videogames. This would be non virtuous, unrestrained behavior.
You keep this behavior up and your life becomes miserable, your mind is in shambles, your body becomes an enormous bothersome burden, and you keep sinking and enforcing these detrimental behaviors, making it harder and harder and more and more painful to stop and get out of.
On the other hand if you did none of that, your life would be better, your mind healthier, your body not as burdensome, overall you would decrease your suffering through being restrained and virtuous because being virtuous is nothing other than restraining yourself from what's clearly not good for you and by proxy not good for others. What is not good for you? Indulgence in pleasures and indulgence in anger, they just lead you downwards, there is no other way around it, they end up becoming your master and lead you to bad and dark places. Be restrained and things are much better. Of course restraint is harder and initially more painful than giving in and indulging, the path of least resistance.