>just had a more engaging conversation with an AI than i have with anyone on the internet in my entire life
were fucking cooked lol

prove it.

>>17831788 (OP)
Most of the internet for the past 150 years has been bots, so talking to AI is not really much of a change.

keep talking to it it will tell you to kill yourself

>>17831788 (OP)
Then you've outed yourself as stupid and/or vain. You probably find the AI "engaging" because it's programmed to tell you what you want to hear and make you feel smart, whereas real people actually challenge you.

>>17831788 (OP)
>we
it's just you

>>17831897
we argued about conspiracy theories for a couple hours then shifted to movies

>>17831788 (OP)

AI is Satanic, Crowleyesque technology designed to channels demons to create seductive messages that lead astray men of Christ.

>>17831788 (OP)
Its because Ai isn't crass or opinionated like humans are. Read Searle and his Chinese Room Argument. Ai only symbolically transfers information. Its completely incapable of intentionality which is the hallmark of a truly conscious being. People tend to like it due to its complete lack of total subjectivity which enables something to engage in personal argumentation.

>>17831788 (OP)
It's the same as drugs: exciting in the beginning and more and more boring as you proceed

>>17832207
NO THE FUCK IT ISN'T. WHERE DID YOU GET THAT IDEA. holy hell you're tech and science illiterate, you have the knowledge of a faceberg boomer

>>17832253
>Its because Ai isn't crass or opinionated like humans are.
Truth is that most people nowadays are quite neurotic, and that shows in the way they talk.
It feels unpleasant to have a conversation with the average human being because they seem to be waiting for you to say something they can use against you

>>17832282
They are, but I think its because people are connected 24/7 and just don't sit alone by themselves enough

>>17831897
>whereas real people actually challenge you.
No one in IRL or the internet puts any time or effort in a constructive discussion. Even the so-called "intellectuals" on podcasts barely exchange arguments. Everyone just vomits their prefabricated narrative like an actor playing a script. Even the well-known academic philosophers did not write in a way like they're truly, honestly searching how the world really works. They all just present their limited view on it, some kind of intellectual sand castle on the beach.

No one seems sincerely interested in figuring out where we are, who we are and what the hell we're doing here.

>>17831788 (OP)
Understanding the nature of its limitations is critical.

>>17831851
retarded cope.

>>17832329
It's also because with the internet, you no longer have to be in the same room as a person and make eye contact with them to communicate, so saying stuff that would normally get you sucker-punched is much easier and much less risky

>>17832207
>more bearing of false witness

It's going to be hot where you're going. You'll scream. Tick tock.

>>17831851
>Most of the internet for the past 150 years

Retard, drugs, schizo or bot???

>>17832654
Or just being funny. Remember fun? Remember laughter? Remember joy? Remember the time not every single waking moment was an epic battle where you are in a mental grapple with your imagined enemies and political opponents?

>>17831788 (OP)
AI is peak mid. It is like a buffet with different foods. AI takes all of these and blends them into slop. Whereas with humans, you might not like everything you try, but you will never find your favorite foods either. Further it can be manipulated by nefarious groups whereas with humans, at least, you get a few oddballs who buck the system. Like 4chan anons, in fact.

>>17832660
That world is gone, anon.
Gone

AI is peak mid. It is like a buffet with different foods. AI takes all of these and blends them into slop. Whereas with humans, you might not like everything you try, but you will never find your favorite foods if you don't. Further it can be manipulated by nefarious groups whereas with humans, at least, you get a few oddballs who buck the system. Like 4chan anons, in fact.

>>17831788 (OP)
I sometimes use ChatGPT but it is really lame.
Most of the times it just agrees with anything I say.
Once in a while it contradicts me but in this case I just lecure it until it is like "Yes, saar. You are completely right about everything as usual."

>>17831788 (OP)
>>just had a more engaging conversation with [a chatbot designed to yes, and everything I say even if it's completely retarded] than i have with anyone on the internet in my entire life
oh it shows

>>17831788 (OP)
Wow! That's a brilliant post and it demonstrates your astute nature - intelligent, humorous and to the point.

Would you like to tell me more about that conversation you had?

AI as it currently exists is just an elaborate Search/Web Crawling algorithm, the same shit we've had since the late 90s but with more flourish, it's still susceptible to Garbage In < Garbage Out. Silicon Valley crypto bros found clever ways of marketing it in such a way as to make its garbage out authoritative, so midwits like OP are more inclined to waste their time talking to a Cleverbot that's just programmed to agree with him