Why were Romans so hellbent on exporting orientals (MENAs) and their degeneracy to their European holdings (Britannia, Gaul, Hispania, Balkans), but not the other way around? Were menas simply more adherent to Roman custom and therefore were entrusted to “romanize” the populations of the European areas?

>>17835762 (OP)
I'm not sure why a world-spanning empire that crushed everyone underfoot economically and spiritually would export slave-like and degenerate Middle Easterners to strong and naturally independent white countries... It's just unheard of.

>>17835762 (OP)
MENA were like ten times more popolous than Britannia Gaul and Hispania.

>>17835768
There are stories of Syrian and Egyptian communities in Britannia that were thriving

>>17835762 (OP)

>>17835762 (OP)

>>17835762 (OP)
It prevents cohesion. Byzantines kept this practice by moving MENA peoples into the balkans and slavs into Anatolia.

>>17836063
Aristoteles (more like Dystoteles) and Plato were brainlets who should have their works and busts sealed deep underground. Epicurus has in posteriori completely btfod those two clowns.

>>17835762 (OP)

Because they were globohomo paganfaggots.

>>17836615
>T. Bustyboy enjoyer

>>17835768
The degenerate middle easterners actually had civilizations at the time, unlike the mudhut dwelling northern euros. You have civilization thanks to the phoenicians and greeks (the romans just exported greek civilization), europeans never developed indigenous civilizations, they wallowed in illiteracy, mudhuts and human sacrifices

>>17836745
>T. Bacha Bazi

>>17836612
Elaborate

>>17835762 (OP)
This is a Moroccan building, it has nothing to do with Lebanese, Syrians, Iraqis, Palestinians and sand rats who are only good at murdering each other and living in mud huts.

>>17836800
Braindead response.
Also, ancient Greeks were pederasts too.

>>17836745
we wuz civilization
n shieet sarr

>>17838222
It's an Arab building for the Arab kings of Nafri pussy. Nafri pussy is slave of Arabs.

>>17838222
All still better than nafris

>>17835762 (OP)
Europeans were seen letting horses fuck their wives and bathing in swamps for a long time. "MENAs" didn't change anything.
>>17836612
When you write stuff like this, don't cry when Muslims ransack artifacts of prehistory themselves

>>17838936
>>17838953
No, this is Moroccan architecture. Arabs are Bedouin savages and are unable to create a functionning state, let alone their own architectural style.

I agree that we Nafris have nothing to do with Syrians tho, as they are genetically closer to Europeans. They should all go to Europe and stay as far away from us as possible.

>>17838997
Moorish architecture come from Umayyad Syrians
Nafris don't even have a civilization before Phoenicians (Levantines), Romans (Italians), Arabs civilized you

>>17838883
Sorry I can't hear what the bitch boy says.

>>17838963
Hey bacha bazi, maybe learn to read. I said sealed underground not destroyed.

>>17838116
Basically, Dystoteles and his gorilla instructor came up with a deeply flawed epistemology obsessed with teleology which blocked any real scientific progress in Europe for 1000 years. Worse yet they encouraged the suppression of Epicurus and his works.

>>17839135
Some scholars think Bacha Bazi has ancient Greek influence, which makes sense. Kys, retard.

>>17839006
>>17838997
>>17838222
Both afro asiatics
MENA is a real thing

>>17835762 (OP)
You need educated and cultured people, not a bunch of barbarians smashing rocks together and fucking sheep

>>17839710
>It's greek's fault we are gay!
It's been 2k years, just accept you like boypussy faggots

>>17839714
Nope. This building reflects Moroccan architectural traditions and was built by Moroccan craftsmen within Morocco. Attributing it to a vague European-made label like "Afroasiatic" is both inaccurate and deceptive.

Rather than wasting their time trying to coopt Moroccan achievements, ME savages should prioritize addressing the various issues facing their people, namely inbreending and sectarian tensions.

>>17835762 (OP)
>Were menas simply more adherent to Roman custom and therefore were entrusted to “romanize” the populations of the European areas?
Yeah MENAS are more submissive and obedient to their Aryan masters then the other not yet civilized Aryans.

>>17835762 (OP)
Gauls were laughable. Might as well look anywhere else.

>>17838997
> Arabs are Bedouin savages and are unable to create a functionning state, let alone their own architectural style.
than why is saudi arabia less of a shithole than morocco?

>>17840902
the middle east is more developed than northwest africa despite israel destabilizing it with endless wars for decades dude
and that "moroccan" architecture is arab influenced, look up guanche "architecture" if you want to see native berber architecture without arab influence

>>17840954
Saudi Arabia is only slightly more developed than Morocco, and it is entirely due to the money generated from its natural ressources rather than by its people who are just bunch of inbred bedouins like the rest of the Middle East.

Remove the oil and KSA would be no different would be a complete shithole filled with barely sentient inbred creatures like Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen.

>>17840968
>human development index
lmao

all of the gulf is far more developed than morocco, except yemen that is in a literal war
>Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Yemen.
3 countries that have been at war for decades and 1 that has been swarmed with a quantity of refugees that now comprise 1/3 of the population of lebanon and is constantly bombed every couple years by israel with missiles
shitroccans can only surpass literal warzones

>>17835762 (OP)
>Why were Romans so hellbent on exporting orientals (MENAs) and their degeneracy to their European holdings (Britannia, Gaul, Hispania, Balkans)
They imported civilized people and architects to uncivilized places and didn't import uncivilized savages to civilized places. Based, no?

>>17840959
You wish lol. NWA is light year ahead of the Middle East who is just a bunch of ruins at this point.

And Whites are using the Middle East as play ground because Arabs themselves are an inferior race of inbred bedouins unable to produce stable states that can fend off White encroachment.


There's no evidence that Guanches were Amazigh. Numidians were Amazigh tho and they built built picrel while Arabs lived in tents without any ounce of civilization and now are building like picrel. Building tents is the best Arab will ever be able to achiveve.

>>17840959
You wish lol. NWA is light year ahead of the Middle East who is just a bunch of ruins at this point.

And Whites are using the Middle East as play ground because Arabs themselves are an inferior race of inbred bedouins unable to produce stable states that can fend off White encroachment.


There's no evidence that Guanches were Amazigh. Numidians were Amazigh tho and they built picrel while Arabs lived in tents without any ounce of civilization and now are building like OP's pic. Building tents is the best Arab will ever be able to achiveve.

ftfm

>>17840995
NWAs are apes, the guanche were fucking hunter gatherers in 1200 bc, numidians were quasi nomadic retard, this is why it was so easy for arabs to subjugate the berbers
the middle east is more developed than NWA despite israel stagnating the development of the entire region for more than half a century

also can you please call yourself berbers and not arabs? all the berbers in europe that call themselves arabs are giving us a bad name

this >>17841004 is for you >>17841000
the primitive berber deleted the comment

>>17840959
You wish lol. NWA is light year ahead of the Middle East who is just a bunch of ruins at this point. And Whites are using the Middle East as a play ground because Arabs themselves are an inferior race of inbred bedouins unable to produce stable states that can fend off White encroachment.

There's no evidence that Guanches were Amazigh. Numidians were Amazigh tho and they built picrel while Arabs lived in tents, and now Amazighs are building like OP's pic.


ftfm x2

>>17835762 (OP)
>Were menas simply more adherent to Roman custom and therefore were entrusted to “romanize” the populations of the European areas?
Yes, MENAs were closer to Romans in civilizational level and race than north Europeans.
>>17835790
Wrong tho.

I could kinda understand if Persians, Greeks or even Egyptians and Iraqis start wewuzing about their ancient civilizations n shiet but nafris doing it sound like a big joke

>>17841007
see >>17841004
don't you have a spear to throw and a loincloth to wear?

>>17841004
Numidians were sedentary farmers with robust political institutions, a developed architectural traditions and a distinct alphabet.

By contrast, the Arabs were nomads, borrowed their alphabet from the Arameans and adopted their political institutions and architectural styles from the Byzantines and the Persians.

Seething won't change this.

>>17841021
Don't you have some humanitarian aid to beg for?

>>17835762 (OP)
Because the east had the excess population and the west the excess land to develop.
It's one thing to put western soldiers in the east (happened a lot), but western civilians? The fuck are you gonna put them?

>>17841071
numidians were at best semi civilized, north africans in their natural state would still be hunter gatherers like the guanche, north africans were civilized by many foreign people like punics, romans and arabs
still today all of the gulf is more developed than NWA

>>17841295
Gulfis own their development to their natural ressources. They will return to their natural, c.f. Syria, Iraq, Palestine, Yemen and Lebanon, once they ran out of oil or electricity replace oil as the dominant fuel.

>in their natural state would still be hunter gatherers
Funny you mention that we (Natufian) invented farming and civilized your Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer ancestors. Which reminds me that all civilizations of worth in the Middle East had a Amazigh ruling caste which forced its language upon the Arab/Caucasian lower caste.

>>17841497
cope, you said this cope for probably 30 years now
>Natufian
you're not natufian, amazighs barely have natufian ancestry
>Which reminds me that all civilizations of worth in the Middle East had a Amazigh ruling caste which forced its language upon the Arab/Caucasian lower caste.
it's the other way around, arabs ruled over NWA for many years
no berber ever ruled over a country in west asia

>>17841497
semites dominated north africa, anazigh are losers

>>17841519
OH NO NO NO

>>17841554
oh no... what will i do, the schizo berber ruined a language tree with his fanart

>>17841554
cope
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Afro-Asiatic-languages

>>17841610
Copts conquered you? Fair enough.

>>17839710
It came from Tibetan Buddhist influence. ancient tibetans were boy fucking barbarian faggots.