>>17843484
>you can't be Iberian and call people brown
that's self defense because an iberian called him brown, pointing to the obvious iron that if northern italians are brown so are iberians
>Iberians are part sub saharan african
literally doesn't say that at all, iberians not mentioned there at all
>cisalpine getting raped by jovialis where he refused to accept CHG in Northern Italy, did not listen to jovialis citing studies
so you just create narratives here, he never says anything like that, in fact he explicitly states "it's possible"
>Anatolian Bronze Age is almost absent in northern Italy
retard, he's talking about a chart that jovialis posted and he's pointed out that ABA is absent in northern italy in that chart that jovialis posted
>9% CHG and Iran_N is too much for northern Italians
it is for some north italians, and in the same comment he even said that he never denied chg in northern italy
>southern italians are over 10% natufian
he says 10%, and sicilians, that are southern italians have around that much
>the vast majority of northern italians are 100% purely WHG ANF and Steppe
he didn't say all
>Etruscans were just Italics that spoke non IE (he changed his mind since then and Etruscans are not Italics whatsoever now)
this is true
>He's so dumb he thinks it proves north Italians are Celts even though the preprint literally says the opposite, that they were on the terroni cline before the Germanic invasions introduced admixture that shifted them north.
the paper says that they were 75% italy_IA, definitely different from southern italians