Why is it that black people from English speaking American countries are considered African adjacent while black ppl from Spanish speaking american countries are not?
>>17841244 (OP)
No mulatto wants to voluntarily be identified as African unless it is massively incentivized by the state, this is because African heritage is universally associated with low intelligence and low social status. As far as material affirmative action benefits in the US are concerned, there isn't a huge advantage for identifying as black rather than Hispanic, the Jewish elite trusts both groups equally well.
>>17841244 (OP)
I know this is complicated so I will help you out... you pick the brown category if you are brown, then you write in what country your brown ass is from. Or if white, same process. Same for black, or Asian.
>>17841454
If you are some aberration, a hybrid, then you are instructed to select multiple appropriate categories to reflect your inherently schizophrenic predisposition.
>>17841493 >Nationality and ethnicity are conflated
Nationality rose to prominence as a proxy for race when racism became taboo. But race has never been nationality, it is retarded and illogical to suggest that it could be. Take a French person just on their side of the German border, they are not a distinct race because of some arbitrary line and never were.
>>17841548
Generally the only recognized race for Europeans is European, synonymous with white. You could try to subdivided whites into a few broad categories, the reds, blondes, auburn, and black haired for example. But it has been a very long time since those sub groups were isolated to the geographic ranges in which they evolved.
