>>17845840 (OP)
Alchool kills your t levels and has more estrogen than onions

>>17845840 (OP)
I fucking love milkshakes. started drinking them regularly recently. just milk and whatever fruit I have lying around. love banana and strawberry, but a lot of tropical fruits work well. mango, papaya. good stuff
don't even need to add any sugary shit. I love chocolate and vanilla and peanut butter milkshakes, but I'm honestly fine with just the fruit on a regular basis
>Wasn’t it actually alcohol?
sure, in egypt and mesopotamia it was probably what fueled their entire civilizations
alchool is great for cattle
lots of energy, clean hydration, numbs their brain to the pain and misery of being virtually slaves
not sure milkshakes would work for those people, due to their intolerance to lactose
I suppose milk fueled european civilization, on the other hand. feels good to be lactose tolerant, man

>>17845840 (OP)
Milkshakes are literally for children and always have been

>>17845840 (OP)
These teens would drink milkshakes and then fuck like rabbits, leading to a massive spike in unwed mothers and abandoned bastards.

>>17845840 (OP)
the more read about the 50s the more people then come across as such massively repressed dweebs
i think the 60s proved it

>>17846592
How do I make them at home?

>>17846573
Got a study to cite?

>>17846705
>get a blender
>put whatever ice cream, fruit, milk, ice, ect. you want it it
>push button

Diahera saar

>>17846608
That's way better than population collapse

>>17846628
>the more read about the 50s the more people then come across as such massively repressed dweebs
>>>/mu/127052295

Put some 50s muzic on for contextual evidence.

>>17833204
You think this thread also proves the idea of 50s people being turbo-repressed dorks? That's a lot of people being killed and cheating on their S/O because of having to cork up their inner chimpanzee until it finally couldn't be corked up any longer.

in Japan sugary snacks are regarded as chick food and it's unmanly to consume them

>>17846597
Sounds like your father beat you every time he saw you having fun.

>>17846573
That wasn't the question.

>>17845840 (OP)
>@LatinxAdolf
Holy shit the memes are fucking real, these jokes really do write themselves don't they?

>>17845840 (OP)
Genocide all Twitter fags

>>17847564
this old Nigerian guy i used to work with told me "candy is for children, are you a child?", that was like 6 years ago and i haven't eaten any candy since
still like some good ice cream sometimes

>>17846592
I’m a lactose intolerant brown person and drink milkshakes all the time

>>17846628
This usage of the word "repressed" as a way to discredit people is quite suss and modernitypilled.
If you have bad desires you should repress them. Ideally you "suppress" them and "sublimate" them. But repression is the first stage.

You definitely don't "express yourself" or "speak your truth" or whatever you think the 60s was about. Because that leads to the 70s, 80s, and 90s. I.E. serial killers, AIDS, and passive aggression. Yes, all equally bad. You are an evil creature like John Wayne Gacy for sipping tea with a prideful expression.

>>17850166
>>17847564
Exactly
>>17847826
This guy is also repressed, but he doesnt realize it. He'll accuse everyone else of being repressed for not indulging their inner toddler - but when will he indulge his inner grown man?
Both of these paths are necessary to take on the way to maturity but most people who say this "everyone's on their own journey" bullshit only want to defend the fun and easy stuff and they cry about "repression" as if they have pristine, kind souls.

>>17850482
Remember folks, if you don't talk about the bad stuff it doesn't exist. This is basically the social equivalent of trying to hide the mess so that your Facebook selfie makes you look psychologically healthy when in reality you're on the verge of a breakdown 24/7.

>>17850498
Again, this is the patented avoidant response.
Theres a place between "letting it all hang out" (Which you dont actually do. Youre passive aggressive.) And never ever discussing your dark side (Which you're guilty of in 2025, not 1950. Your "dark side" just happens to be chaste and disciplined adulthood where in the 50s it was being a wild angry slut.)

The first thing everyone learns to do in response to their dark impulses (for you that might be saying the n-word, or slut-shaming)(you'll never admit to this because you're repressed) - is...repress them.
It's how you put your problems in cryo-stasis until you're grown up enough to experience those feelings voluntarily and wield them productively.

Define "Drink of Choice" because that sounds pretty broad and very easy to generalize to be honest
You might as well make the argument that Coca-Cola was America's "Drink of Choice" as it's a prime symbol of Americanism and was and still is a popular drink in the US and around the world, and Coca-Cola is actually about as old as Milkshakes are (both were invented in the mid-1880s) so I honeslty believe Coke has more legitimacy to this title than anything else

>>17846628
>the more people then come across as such massively repressed dweebs
Naw, that's just the Chud version of the 1950s. In reality, all the cool kids in those days were Beatniks and Greasers that hung out in places like Greenwich Village smoking pot and getting high on Obertrol (Apmphetamines). The truth is that the 50s actually were not that remarkable compared to other decades, midwits just love romanticising it as some "golden age of America" while ignoring shit like the Eisenhower Recession. It's just simple Golden Age Fallacy

>>17846608
So those milkshakes really did bring all the boys to the yard!

>>17850608
It had counter-culture this is true but the sense of "social cohesion" if you'll excuse the buzzword was necessarily higher than it is today.
We dont have "counter-" culture today because there's nothing to counter. 50% white and 100% individualist is not the same scenario as 90% white and 100% american.

>>17850629
>but the sense of "social cohesion" if you'll excuse the buzzword was necessarily higher than it is today.
There were race riots in the 1950s. I'm not saying it's wholly bad or good. I'm calling you a historically illiterate retard for generalizing a decade to fit your modern narrarative. You're doing the 50s a disservice actually by making everyone out to be completely soulless and incapable of independent thought. "Social Cohesion" lmao

>>17850629
>social cohesion
>counter-culture
The poverty rate in the United States throughout the 1950s was between 22% and 25%, this is significantly higher than it is today. Your view of this decade is entirely through the lens of Norman Rockwell paintings

The Ford Edsel was and still is considered one of the biggest automotive flops of all time, with losses estimated to be between $4 billion and $5 billion, and its failure was partially blamed on the late 1950s Eisenhower Recession. The term "Edsel" for many, many decades afterwards became synonymous with marketing failures

Pictured: The Title Card for the "Educational Film" Duck and Cover, a film warning about the dangers of nuclear war from the Soviets and was shown to Elementary School children throughout the 1950s during the peak of the Red Scare

>>17850644
that's actually a falsification because LBJ changed the definition of "poverty" to exclude people on government assistance so the poverty rate magically dropped to single digits overnight

>>17850651
The US economy sunk into a recession in the fall of 1957 partially due to an overly tight monetary policy. The initial wave was over by summer '58 but a renewed recession began in the spring of 1960 and it was a significant factor in the '60 presidential election.

>>17850655
All you're saying is that more people were on Welfare in the 1950s

Pictured: The Entrance to Cafe Wha in Greenwich Village in New York City, a popular venue for night life

>>17850608
Still, funny how people were happy and entertained by centuries of accumulated western culture, then, for no reason at all, in the space of years suddenly people had to smoke weed and meth and pretend to like shitty music to be happy. It is almost as though the "corrupting the youth" thing was actually true and boomers became the first generation brainwashed from infancy by mass media.

>>17850659
>partially due to an overly tight monetary policy.
Nope, it was caused by wartime government contracts expiring, this had somewhat of a cascading effect as thousands were laid off from their jobs as a result

>>17850644
By social cohesion, i dont mean everyone was in the same economic class. I dont even mean that everyone got along perfectly. I mean they were a nation.

>>17850667
>then, for no reason at all, in the space of years suddenly people had to smoke weed and meth
*ahem*
>Obetrol was the brand name of a drug combining several amphetamine salts indicated for the treatment of exogenous obesity. It was originally sold by the American company Obetrol Pharmaceuticals. Obetrol was a popular diet pill in America in the 1950s and 1960s.[1]
The primary active ingredient of Obertrol was Amphetamines, people at the time often abused the pill, where it was called "Obertrolling"

>>17850660
This is the mindset of a repressed person. Can't admit to the merit of a different cultural experience. First step of maturation.
You want to avoid judging people and hurting their feelings, so you cut off that side of yourself off completely and label it "the norman rockwell facade".

>>17850667
>suddenly people had to smoke weed
After prohibition in the 1920s, usage of Marijuana actually went UP, and was known at the time as "Reefer Madness"
>all of the sudden
>no reason at all
LMAO

>>17850671
You aren't countering his point at all. He's conceding the counterculture of the 50s as a condition of civilizational decline, which had already begun.
He's not the one idolizing the decade - you are. Only for you it's a kind of anti-idol. An image of the devil for you to project all your irrational hatred onto.

You're swept up by an anti-fantasy every bit as focused on the commercial culture of the era.

>>17850675
>In 1950, approximately 3 out of every 100 children in the United States were receiving Aid to Dependent Children (ADC).
>At that time, there were an estimated 719,000 children in 358,000 families receiving ADC in the United States.

>>17850689
Yes, how terrible.

>>17850687
>Only for you it's a kind of anti-idol.
It's more of a kneejerk reaction, and I concede. Again, it's not about calling a decade wholly good or bad, in any case it's just foolish to generalize

>>17850695
And yet you're going to have to. It's ridiculous not to notice any trends in history as if each passing decade is purely neutral, because god forbid you get a statistic wrong.

I notice its really common for this generation to hedge their value judgements on everything because theyre afraid they'll get a twitter response correcting them. And then they'll be "outed" permanently as a bully, or presumptuous, or emotionally unintelligent.Or god forbid, "insecure" or "repressed".
It isn't the conservative 50s that instilled this paranoid self censorship.

Now its turning and people are acting like jackasses again because our celebrities started saying "retard" on tv..
And online, instead of decrying everything as "racist" were getting "thats jewish". Horray for us.

>>17850738
>It isn't the conservative 50s that instilled this paranoid self censorship.
McCarthyism literally instilled paranoia and self-censorship. You lost. Get over it

>>17850743
But you're still slavishly dedicated to the script, despite not having joseph mcarthy to blame. You've been liberated from "the fifties" and you're still an asshole.

Do you not see how aggressively you want to enforce contemporary social norms, even down to the grammar you use?

>>17846898
Why

>>17850942
>living is better than dyung
>lmao why
Is it even worth explaining?

>>17845840 (OP)
"Milk-shake", a fraudulent name. It ought to be called Icecream-shake, because that's what it is. "Ice-cream", another fraudulent name.

>>17845840 (OP)
>actually
when all age groups are counted and filtered, the drink of choice is branch water and bourbon.

>>17846573
>has more estrogen than onions
So does cow milk and meat

>>17851012
Population collapse has nothing to do with you dying.

>>17845840 (OP)
Shortsighted and historically illiterate, America was most energetic 1800-1850 and during that time whiskey was cheaper than milk and they drank like 6 gallons of alcohol a year.

>>17851599
It's a collective death my friend. Followed by collective replacement.

>>17851485
the world is a cavern of lies.

>>17850330
imagine the smell