Weren't the "pure Aryan" Scythians technologically inferior to every IE group in Europe? Celts had huge towns while Scythians lived in fucking wagons, even Vikings created trade networks while all Scythians could do was raid Slavic farmers.

>>17847095 (OP)
Vikings didn't create "trade networks", the Volga Route was established by the Goths, and the Indo-Iranians of the Russian Steppe were subsequently exterminated by the Early Slavs (the Penkovka culture of the Antes) after the Scytho-Sarmatshit chimp-outs that caused the militarization and pauperization of the eastern complex of the Proto-Slavic Chernoles culture.

The traditional allure of the Indo-Iranian stems from the centuries-spanning "commonwealth" nomadic civilization that spanned the vast majority of the Eurasian Steppe. Without them, there'd be Hunshits, no Turkshits, no Mongolshits, no Gengisshits, no Ottomanshits, no Tatarshits, no Timurshits, you know the rest. The modern allure stems from right-winger pseudohistorians glorifying the White Nigger aspect of the Indo-Iranian culture that appeals to the basic common denominator among the disgruntled Whites of all castes.

>>17847095 (OP)
The Scythian animal style was oddly influential across Eurasia and they were apparently rich enough to have Greek artists produce objects to their taste.
They obviously weren't some kind of Gypsies or whatever you imagine them as.

>implying this isn't a shill thread
reminder to NEVER engage with anyone who isn't clearly shilling, just like OP

>>17847161
>If you critizize aryan trannies, it means you are le shill
Hang yourself low t cuck faggot

>>17847095 (OP)
>Weren't the "pure Aryan" Scythians technologically inferior to every IE group in Europe?
Sarmatians and Scythians were more advanced than the Celts, Germanics, and Slavs. They also kept the aforementioned groups as slaves that would farm on their behalf.