← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 17855331

18 posts 12 images /his/
Anonymous No.17855331 >>17855343 >>17855383 >>17855592 >>17855623 >>17856507 >>17857035 >>17857169
>Blue eyes formed 6000 years ago around the Black Sea
>Proto-Indo-European formed 6000 years ago around the Black Sea
>Blue eyes are only found in areas were Indo-European languages are spoken or used to be spoken
>The people who spoke Proto-Indo-European called themselves Aryan
>The people who spoke Proto-Indo-European used swastikas
>The people who spoke Proto-Indo-European were extremely patriarchal and patrilineal and didn't believe in adopting or raising other people's kids (they were likely 100% homogeneous, originally at least)
>Haplogroup R1a and R1b are only found in areas were Indo-European languages are spoken or used to be spoken
>The upper lesser mixed classes of India and Iran are more likely to have lighter features and R1a DNA than the lower more mixed classes
>The Sanskrit word for caste is varna (color)

You're evil and racist if you think these things are related.
Big Bongus !!9zfcclmmPlH No.17855343 >>17855357 >>17856480
>>17855331 (OP)
>>The people who spoke Proto-Indo-European called themselves Aryan
>>The people who spoke Proto-Indo-European used swastikas
And? Nazis didn't exist when the Proto-Indo-Europeans lived. What are these things related to?
Anonymous No.17855357 >>17855438 >>17856482 >>17857103
>>17855343

Germans are the most unmixed proto-Indo-Europeans and closest to the originals.
Anonymous No.17855383
>>17855331 (OP)
Ah yes i too love to talk about the hyperborean White Heaven of Bronze Age Chad
Big Bongus !!9zfcclmmPlH No.17855438
>>17855357
That's not true
Anonymous No.17855592
>>17855331 (OP)
>>The people who spoke Proto-Indo-European called themselves Aryan
It's not clear that this is the case, given that that endonym is only attested in Indo-Iranian.
>>The people who spoke Proto-Indo-European used swastikas
As did most cultures at some point.
Anonymous No.17855623
>>17855331 (OP)
Dindu-Europee-ans(or the people of steppe) were heavily bashed in Zoroastrian literature as degenerate violent savages. They have nothing on Persia.
Anonymous No.17856480
>>17855343
Not really true though. Only the iranian indo europeans referred to themselves as aryan. Also. It was arya not aryan. We don't know what the others called themselves bc they didn't leave any writing behind. Don't confuse the vedic vea texts with the european or northern middle eastern branches. After 100 years they probably didn't even know they had cousins that took over all of europe. And the swastika is suppossed to symbolize something with the sun and peace. Pretty interesting, Google it. Wild stuff.
Anonymous No.17856482 >>17856637
>>17855357
Nope. The closest would be Estonians. Oddly enough.
Anonymous No.17856507
>>17855331 (OP)
Wrong. But according to your logic- the Aryan race was born in Italy.
Anonymous No.17856637 >>17857070 >>17857106
>>17856482
Despite the fact that they speak a Uralic language?
Anonymous No.17857035
>>17855331 (OP)
Indo-Europeans aren't real and you cannot know what eye colour a skull had and the rest of your post is varies between mistruthfull and lies
Anonymous No.17857070 >>17857095 >>17857106
>>17856637
Reminder that the Jews used to speak a germanic language and the French used to speak Gaelic.
Anonymous No.17857095
>>17857070
Ashkenazi Jews specifically, who do not constitute the entire world Jewish population. And Celtic =/= Gaelic.
Anonymous No.17857103
>>17855357
>Germans
>Unmixed
I'm having a hearty laugh. Fucking Americans unironically think Germans are all blonde and blue eyed lmao. 30 minutes in Germany (and I'm talking like rural Brandenburg or Mecklenburg here) will dispell that myth.
Not to mention Germany is the literal crossroads of Europe, sitting smack in the middle of the great northern plain. Every invading army and rampaging horde has gone through Germany, Germany is the "village bicycle" kek
Anonymous No.17857106
>>17856637
You're aware that they speak a Latin language in Bolivia, eh? Do you get the hint?
>>17857070
Gaulish and Gaelic are not the same, it's confusing but they're distinct things. Gaelic is not at all interchangeable with languages like Breton.
Anonymous No.17857169 >>17857181
>>17855331 (OP)
There's a big problem with the Steppe theory.

Namely, if the Indos brought the Indo-European languages and civilization into Europe, why did they start doing it immidiately in Greece, but in northern Europe, it took them a 1000 years more to establish the simplest forms of organization?

The only explanation I see for this is that they came from the Near East.
From there, some went to Greece, then some went to Italy, then after a few centuries, they traveled north through he Middle East, and spread across the northern Europe from the Steppe.
Anonymous No.17857181
>>17857169
Anatolia is also one of the major theories of the IE Urheimat, yes.