Thread 17862501

>fights against the entire world
>almost wins

Adolf Hitler is the greatest man in human history.

>wastes everyone's time for six years in a doomed tantrum
>blows his brain out instead of face justice
How many chicken nuggets have you eaten in the past 36 hours?

>>17862501 (OP)
Begone Jew!

>>17862501 (OP)
Russia won
Africa won
The West is defeated

>>17862507
Schickl and Gruber are both gentile names in Austria
Hitler's real name was Hiedler

>>17862522
>Alois Hitler (né Schicklgruber;[1] 7 June 1837 – 3 January 1903) was an Austrian civil servant in the customs service, and the father of German dictator Adolf Hitler.
Yet more Jewish lies from you

>>17862501 (OP)
He barely was winning against a weakened Soviet Union with a purged army and an isolated United Kingdom. Once the U.S. declared war it was over

>>17862542
>Once the U.S. declared war it was over
You mean once HE declared war on the US. >>17862542

>>17862501 (OP)
>almost wins
Lmao ok let's hear it anon.

>>17862514
Two more weeks until Ukraine sues for peace

>>17862505
>blows his brain out instead of face justice
Justice was him winning. There is no justice by being judged by your inferiors

>>17862501 (OP)
>almost
>>17862595
>inferiors
>won
>won so hard they litterally raped your country in half and caused you to shit your breeches in terror and shoot yourself

>started war on 2 fronts at same time with no manpower to spare

>lose

At what point was he winning? Only chance he had of winning was at Dunkirk and he blew it

>>17862618
>a gang of ants ganging up on you won
okay..

>>17862642
If ants can take you down maybe you weren't that great to begin with?

>>17862654
Million ants can take down a human, doesn't make them not ants. This is the case in WW2, unfortunately.

>>17862719
>Million ants can take down a human
Bullshit, if I saw a million ants I'd grab my hose and turn the water on and spray the fuckers

>>17862722
What if you don't have a hose? What if they overwhelm you before you get it?

>>17862725
Ants aren't that fast, I could probably outrun them or get on a bike

>>17862731
They can block your path and surround you though. Ants are smart.

>>17862734
Then I'll have to deploy my secret weapon...

>>17862635
Even then he wouldn't have won.
He'd still attack the ussr and still botch Barbarossa, and US will still send millions of bullets, boots, engines and tires.

And even if Britain exited the war in 1940, they might still declare war on Germany again in 1941. This is literally what they did with Napoleon when he kept expanding.
Britain isn't just going to sit and watch Germany carve out a mongolian empire to the Caucasus. They will absolutely torpedo their empire if necessary to prevent that from happening.

>>17862740
You sick fuck

>>17862779
>even if Britain exited the war in 1940, they might still declare war on Germany again in 1941.
Let me guess, you also think Britain could rejoin the EU any day

>>17862550
close call in 1941 desu

>>17862654
>>17862618
Why is the polish inferiority complex so strong?
We saw a 1v1 vs Loland. BVLLmany won and won hard.
A straight 1v1 and the Poles couldn’t even put up a resistance. They went down in 35 days.
Iraq lasted longer against the U.S.

>>17862779
>>17862635

>no no no he could never win stop liking Hitler
LOL

>>17862550
Hitler accepts Stalin’s peace offer. Hitler now 1v1s Britain with Soviet support.
the British empire did collapse before the USSR did. It’s not like Britain would be able to sustain a war against the combined might of Germany and the USSR.

The Kaiser was closer to wining ww1 than Shitler ever was to wining ww2

>>17863929
No? Hitler was way better off. Look at how he absolutely slammed Poland.

>>17863929
Not really. Hitler needed one or two decisions to go his way to win. Wilhelm had no chance whatsoever and he lucked the hell out with the bolshevik revolution in Russia.

>>17862501 (OP)
Edgy! You should kill yourself.

>>17862948
It doesn't really take much beurocratic work to declare war. Especially if Britain exits the war on a status-quo deal in 1940.

So you really think Britain and France are just going to sit and watch Germany conquer all of the USSR, when just Poland was bad enough?

Again, they agreed to with Napoleonic France as well, only to declare war again soon after.

>>17862951
1941 was when they lost the war, not "near winning" it. Dumb moron.

>>17862951
How the fuck was 1941 a close call?
>btfo in the skies
>btfo at Tobruk
>bogged down with guerrillas all over the Balkans
>Barbarossa ends up in utter failure as the Wehrmacht can't enter Moscow and Soviet industry is evacuated to Siberia
>on top of that, attack the USA which produces 62% of the world's industrial output and can't be invaded by land
The Axis was never close to winning.

>>17862501 (OP)
if only he had not chimped out against russia

>>17864441
They won in Poland, in France, in the Balkans, in Norway, they won fairly hard and fairly often, they were just better, they fought 85% of the planet and they met with success against odds that would have crushed anyone else, they really are a superior race.

>>17865542
Poland, the Balkans, Norway, Denmark aren’t that impressive at all anon. Most of his victories were over countries with very little industry. His only truly impressive conquest was France.

>>17862501 (OP)
>almost wins

>>17865614
This is not really true at all. Poland and Yugoslavia were considered formidable. Poland thought they could hold out the Germans easily in an event of war. People dismiss how astonishing Hitler's conquests were in WW2 because they can't give any credit to the 'bad' guy.

>>17862501 (OP)
Nazism was a doomed political system. It was designed around the systematic destruction of the country's productive class, and was ultimately unsustainable without unlimited conquest. Even if the Nazis conquered the USSR and England, they would eventually run out of people to conquer and would deteriorate until civil war or extinction. Roman empire on speedrun.
Definitely an important figure in history, not gonna argue that. He's more a cautionary tale though for capitalists, that overt fascism is not a way out of their march towards destruction.
>>17862595
Putting people into hierarchies of inferiority is like step 1 for fascism. If you think those hierarchies are static, especially once the "lower tiers" are successfully eliminated, then I have a bridge to sell you. All you accomplish in killing a lower tier is the creation of a new lower tier, which you will eventually find yourself on. Taken to the limit it results in the extinction of the human race.
If you enslave the lower tier instead, you are admitting you depend on them, and that their position in the hierarchy is artificial and out of convenience for you in your "higher tier" position. Nevermind that slave/feudal societies are less efficient than capitalist ones, so production will collapse anyway and you will be overrun by your enemies.
Think before you speak, friend.

>>17865655
>Putting people into hierarchies of inferiority is like step 1 for fascism
And what's the issue with that? Denying reality won't help you. There is a hierarchical order of the world. Not everyone is the same.

If you take out the degenerates plaguing society, there won't be any 'lower' tier, people will just live happier lives in which they are not constantly bothered

>>17862501 (OP)
>fights against the entire world
>wins
why nazis were so comically weak?

>>17865656
>Denying reality won't help you. There is a hierarchical order of the world. Not everyone is the same.