>>17879057
>By provoking war and starting a european wide conflict so great that it quite literally defined global relations for the century following it
No, he did not provoke the conflict. It was the other powers who did it because they were scared of the superior Napoleonic and Revolutionary values.
Yes, the conflict centered around Napoleon was that influential.
>By looting every occupied country to the point that they all allied themselves against Napoleon,
War results in looting, yes. They allied against Napoleon in the end because of his most powerful enemies and especially because of the British economic power that bought such allies.
>even his own brother put in charge of the Netherlands by Napoleon defected against him.
Yes that was a mistake from his part, but there wasn't much he could do in such a situation.
>All of which got reset at the Vienna congress, the The victorious powers pretty successfully suppressed most of the revolutionary ideals up till 1848
Correct, the powers that defeated Napoleon who were most of Europe plus colonies and the Ottoman empire defeated Napoleon, and many of such powers suppressed such ideas but only until 1848.
>Maybe so, but lets at least try to mediate what actual effects he had and measure them against what consequences he inflicted.
I do, and so does everyone who understands the greatness of Napoleon who was the Revolution.
