>>17886290>The Mormon population was supplemented by immigration from the UK, Scandinavia, and other Americans not of the founding Mormon population after Utah was established.Irrelevant anon. My absolute is correct, the vast majority of their ancestry is old stock English. You can see Anglos among them with surnames like Olson, Johnson, Nelson, Young, Reeves, etc and they'll look kind of like Scandinavians often as well. There is a huge German contribution but what I stated can be observed when you look at their actual genetics and many to this day are close to 100% English.
>As to what the guy you're responding to said, England specifically has had continuous immigration from the continent throughout all of historyAlso irrelevant to all of us in fact. English ancestry was already defined well by the Anglo-Saxon paper by Harvard, which included continental (which was this unique combination of, French/Frankish/Continental Celt and non-insular Celt) and northern/Scandinavian admixture, and insular Celts (Bell Beaker/EEF/marginal Roman and continental Celt ancestry) as being English. You could almost divide it into thirds in some regions. In southeast England there is very high Northern and continental ancestry compared to say, nearer to Wales or the north which has more Insular Celtic ancestry than northern or continental.
I do agree with your take on inbreeding but I don't mind the label, it's just resentful fags whose culture never produced great men or nations quite like the British did. All great races that aren't totally guileless are despised by hue manity.