← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 17889673

21 posts 6 images /his/
Anonymous No.17889673 >>17889678 >>17889718 >>17890059 >>17890329 >>17890475 >>17890780 >>17892209
Why do evil people always end up at the top of the food chain? Are good men just too weak and unambitious?
Anonymous No.17889677
>why are nationalists always cocksuckers with ulterior motives
Anonymous No.17889678
>>17889673 (OP)
Sociopaths are more ambitions than the get-along gang.
Anonymous No.17889718 >>17889724 >>17889764 >>17890599
>>17889673 (OP)
FDR was a genuinely good person tho. He shouldn't be lumped with Churchill and Stalin
Anonymous No.17889724 >>17890613 >>17890943
>>17889718
FDR set up concentration camps in America for the Japanese while turning away Jewish refugees of the Holocaust. Definitely not a "good" guy
Anonymous No.17889764
>>17889718
>FDR was a genuinely good person
Anonymous No.17890059 >>17890067
>>17889673 (OP)
Churchill did nothing wrong.
Anonymous No.17890067
>>17890059
FDR did nothing wrong. Churchill was a Soviet agent
>>17890046
Anonymous No.17890084
The top being psychopaths is due to them having an insatiable thirst for power that makes them go for it. Most normal people don't want the stress that comes with the position, having it be literally your entire life. If you've interacted with politicians you'll quickly see so many of them find power intoxicating like a drug, and they're just after the next hit. It's the same with certain businessmen.

Competent nice people get high enough up on the food chain to be good, but want to relax with friends and family and be able to take proper holidays.

But most evil people don't make it high up at all, your average evil person is a poor loser. It's a high risk, high reward lifestyle.
Anonymous No.17890148 >>17890294
Interestingly, you show the top three leaders of the United Nations and label them as 'bad' guys. Makes one wonder who you consider the good guys to be.
Anonymous No.17890294
>>17890148
>Interestingly, you show the top three leaders of the United Nations and label them as 'bad' guys
Oh I'm not trying to make a statement that the Nazi's were le good guys, I see them all as being different shades of authoritarian and evil.
Anonymous No.17890329
>>17889673 (OP)
I wouldn't say they're evil. Just lacking any personal beliefs beyond narcissistic furthering of their own goals. Most people walk on eggshells when they manuever their social contracts in life because they have strong personal views that present moral quandaries when dealing with a situation. This might cause them to butt heads with the other party openly. For example, some people find it difficult to maintain a lie or separate narratives for different parties. Psychos don't have these emotional restraints. Theyre very observant of social interactions and dynamics of hierarchies in order to find means of subverting them. They have no issues lying to your face with a big smile. They just don't feel anything. They see you as an unfeeling NPC who will do what they want if they pick the right dialogue. This is why psychos climb ladders in any sector of society with any semblance of hierarchy or systems built on trust. Governments, banking, education, military, law enforcement, general management, marketing etc.
Anonymous No.17890475
>>17889673 (OP)
Sociopaths are about 1% of the average population, you probably know at least one (or you would if you weren't a chan dwelling shutin). That number jumps to about 5% in professional military circles, and to about 15% in senior businessmen and politicians.
Anonymous No.17890481
This planet is an archonic loosh farm prison

The demiurge rewards those that generate suffering with material blessing
Anonymous No.17890599
>>17889718
not a total nutter like stalin or a cynical twat like churchill. in my opinion just overly naive
Anonymous No.17890613
>>17889724
.
Anonymous No.17890780
>>17889673 (OP)
They’re not all evil per se but we shouldn’t lie about their motives. Churchill was a corrupt fen-monster acting on behalf of foreign interests.
FDR was a corrupt swamp creature whom death itself had to finally take out of office, he acted on behalf of his party constituents and lobbyists many of whom were jewish democrats. A bone to my leftist friends, Untermeyer and Baruch, both of their grandparents were slave owners who became officers in the Confederate army. Turn your anti racism on these jewish lobbyists. Give Whitey a respite.
Stalin was a serious highly efficient and politically motivated ideological leader threading a needle. He wasn’t so much evil as much as he was just amoral. Not immoral but amoral by disposition.

They won. Had they lost we could have the same conversation.
Mussolini and Horthy were irredentists. Boris was of the same stock. So was Paul of South Slavland. They did what was in their national interest.

Hitler was the only “good” man but he was channeling a psychological hurricane and pointing it in the direction of German interests.

All of these men are amoral more so than immoral, this is just the nature of the highest level of statesmanship.

But let’s not lie to ourselves about them.
Yes the Western powers were jewish.
Yes Stalin punished his own as much as he punished his enemies.
Yes the Axis was brutal and only grew more so as they became more desperate.
Anonymous No.17890943 >>17891366
>>17889724
The Japanese citizen would’ve been lynched otherwise and the government couldn’t trust them. More people came out of those camps then went in.
Anonymous No.17891366
>>17890943
>Mostly peaceful concentration camps.
Anonymous No.17892191
poltranny
Anonymous No.17892209
>>17889673 (OP)
Evil thrives at the top because ruthlessness, manipulation, and selfish ambition outcompete integrity in power struggles. Good people prioritize fairness, cooperation, or ethics... Traits that don’t "win" in cutthroat systems.

> Are good men just too weak and unambitious?
They aren't weak. They are principled. History's strongest moral leaders just refuse to play the same dirty game.