>Atheists: Religion is a fairytale, instead I believe in evolution and that humans are animals.
>Also atheists: You're a racist if you question a genetic evolutionary difference between whites and blacks in terms of intelligence and aggression, but I won't care if you mention a genetic difference between them in terms of physical capabilities.

How can so many atheists be so intellectually dishonest? Blacks in Africa are still living in mudhuts while whites were building Rome thousands of years ago, explain why Africa is the only continent that has had little to no scientific progression for milleniums (and you can't blame corruption because every society deals with that) if IQ has nothing to do with any of this.

I just don't believe in god mate

>>17890810 (OP)
>it's another "atheist means whatever political beliefs i disagree with" thread
/his/ just wouldn't be the same without this gem being posted 100 times every week

Coincidently, I just can't find it in myself to believe in the same ideology that the majority of blacks do.

On a tangent to this shitpost, humans did evolve to be the top species of the planet. Atleast almost everywhere. The Americas, Asia, Europe, etcetera, humanity proved dominance over the rest of animals.
But then it's funny how evident some species of human did not achieve the same status. Look at pajeets. Not only they do behave like dirty animals with no concept of self-preservation, but are not even at the top of their food chain. Ever seen how many pajeets have been devoured by tigers, before the White Man hunted the beasts down? Holy shit. Hundreds of jeets devoured. Look up any of the cases of animals hunted down by Jim Corbett. Am I supposed to believe we truly are equal when evolution, history and modern proof for my eyes prove otherwise?

How do people like OP cope with the fact that the countries they think are retarded are the most religious, while the ones they think are intelligent are the least?

>>17891110
So hunting animals to the point of extinction is good?

>>17890810 (OP)
>Blacks in Africa are still living in mudhuts while whites were building Rome thousands of years ago
Keeping jacking off to Rome lol.
What do you get out of being an antagonistic cunt?

>>17891583
>you said humans evolved to be top and prove dominance over other species
>therefore you want to kill all animals to extinction!!!
What the fuck
Where did you crawl from? Go back to twitter you brown 2 digit IQ pleb

>>17891710
Humans aren't really exactly the peak apex predators.

>therefore you want to kill all animals to extinction!!!
You wrote "Not only they do behave like dirty animals with no concept of self-preservation, but are not even at the top of their food chain. Ever seen how many pajeets have been devoured by tigers, before the White Man hunted the beasts down? Holy shit. Hundreds of jeets devoured. Look up any of the cases of animals hunted down by Jim Corbett."

>>17891824
You lack reading comprehension.
>Ever seen how many pajeets have been devoured by tigers (Spoonfeed: Implies a selected group of tigers who have devoured jeets), before the White Man hunted the beasts down? (Spoonfeed: said White Man hunted down the specific tigers that devoured jeets to prevent more harm)
I never wrote driving animals to extinction is a good thing.

>Humans aren't really exactly the peak apex predators.
Precisely, we are way past that. Why do you think we are so developed? Our ancestors became apex predators during the Late Pleistocene, and the usage of tools for hunting had already been a thing tens of thousands of years before. Sweating allowed us to chase down animals for large distances without overexhaustion even if they were faster than us, because they would eventually become tired and succumb to the pressure. Our brains and body structures allowed us to handle the tools for hunting down and killing other animals. It's not cheating, it's how humans adapted in nature and what was favourable to us. Since our brain allowed us to have complex tools and hunting tactics, we did not need fangs or claws at all.
We became apart from nature about the time agriculture began, and eventually civilization, something we were predisposed to because of our sheer technological advantage over other animals, pure survival was no longer a concern to us.

Weapons did become even more deadly too, but ultimately for competing and killing other humans (war) than other animals. We have become a civilized species and do not carry deadly weapons with us all the time because we don't need to, so that's why we could be perceived as "easy targets" when encounters with wild large carnivores, or could not really hunt down anything that is not a chicken without a tool. Although certain breeds of you brownoids certainly suggest being harmless most of the time is a critical mistake, and we should always carry weapons with us.

But of course, (You) are different from us, pajeet. (You) never achieved anything remotely similar to us, not even being the dominant species in your own neighbourhood. Pathetic.

>>17891968
>I never wrote driving animals to extinction is a good thing.
Then why do you imply that. Europe had several major apex predators wiped out, so did China in the late 1800s to now.

>We became apart from nature about the time agriculture began
Not even remotely close. We still very much are part of the Eart and it's environs. The only people who believe otherwise are shut-ins and rich people who never actually experienced nature outside of hyper sanitized excursions

>>17891968
>We have become a civilized species and do not carry deadly weapons with us all the time because we don't need to
What's wrong with carrying firearms?

>>17890810 (OP)
If you were born in 80 BC into a mudhut shithole Germanic tribe where your uncle fucks pigs and literacy has never been heard of, you would have an IQ of 65.
Yet, if a person with the same genetic stock is born into Germany to middle-upper class parents encouraging education and civility, they would probably have an IQ of 100-115.
Case in point, IQ doesn't create the conditions in a country, but the conditions in a country set the IQ of the general population. If we had internet 2000 years ago we would see Persian browns posting about them building cities while Nords live in mudhuts.

>>17891972
I never implied anything you stupid fucking pajeet, what I wrote was clear and objective. Again, please return to whichever low IQ hole you crawled from and refrain from posting anymore
>>17891974
>What's wrong with carrying firearms?
Nothing inherently. I did not say it was wrong, just that people assume it to be pointless because they think they are safe in their streets.

>>17891107
>I just can't find it in myself to believe in the same ideology that the majority of blacks do
Yeah I'm not big on Islam either tbqh.

>>17891006
Kek

>>17890810 (OP)
Notice how red countries are religious ones and blue countries are atheist one. Doesn't look good for christfags.

>>17892000
Aren't the blue ones being taken over by Islam currently?

>>17892025
No that's what beaners like you get groomed into believing by low effort agitprop.

>>17891987
>what I wrote was clear and objective.
Nah, it was low effort bait built on delusion. Just like every other white supremacist screed.

>just that people assume it to be pointless because they think they are safe in their streets.
A fuckton of people still carry in totally safe areas. You are projecting to a super unhealthy degreem

>>17891968
>I never wrote driving animals to extinction is a good thing.
Your writing pretty much glamorized mass die offs due to hunting and animal cullings.

>>17890810 (OP)
Geography, resources, colonialism, trade networks, and historical contingencies (like the tsetse fly limiting livestock in Africa) played huge roles. Modern genetics shows IQ differences within racial groups dwarf any alleged between-group gaps

>>17892025
^This.

>>17892025
>Aren't the blue ones being taken over by Islam currently?
China has a western province that is mostly Muslim but some of the things the Chinese government does will make French-style laicite look tame. Build church/mosque/temple without proper permit? It's dynamite.
https://youtu.be/dL4Vg0FpQjI

>>17892224
>>17892228
>But you said X!
(Gives long wall of text explaining how what I meant was not X)
>...
>But you said X!

Arguing with pajeets and by extension third worlders is always like this. Ain't bothering.

>>17892347
Still trying to start shit with random people? Why do you seem to think killing animals is something to wewuzz about? Indians, Asians and African were still making animal products.

>>17890810 (OP)
Is our 21st century idea of civilization that good of a metric so as to dehumanize a whole continent and diaspora of people who we know possess the same intelligence, emotions and spirituality as their less pigmented counterparts if given ideal conditions? Can you really discard enviromental and societal factors across history (and plain modern subjectivity) in favor of such a correlation as big buildings = homo sapiens?

>>17892368
Also, IQ tests reflect effectiveness and availability of the school system, not racial superiority. Your map showing Singapore and Malaui as peak and bottom is laughable and tells you all you should know about the instrument used to survey this.

>>17890810 (OP)
Let's see here
>Equivocates Atheism to anti-racism when historically Atheists have run the spectrum from "All people are equal" to "professional racism".
>Ignores that humans have some of the lowest genetic diversity in nature. Related species of primates with populations limited to mere thousands and isolated in small inbred groups still have higher genetic diversity than we do. Domesticated crops that have been bred to be as identical as possible like wheat have more genetic diversity.
>Humans only left Africa circa 100'000 years ago and never stopped interbreeding with each other. They have not had neither the time nor reproductive separation to become so divergent.
>There has been no environmental pressure that selects for intelligence absent from Africa while simultaneously omnipresent on all other continents. Nor has their been the opposite: a selective pressure that exists only in Africa that selects for low intelligence.