Thread 17894982

>>17894982 (OP)
This is actually man's fault, not God's. God created man, but its not his fault somehow and he definitely does not condone it (even though he wills every act of man into being and watches it all).

Yeah, theists are pretty fucking stupid.

>>17894982 (OP)
"Sexual attraction to children" doesnt exist.
Its all a sadistic desire to terrorize and the destroy the defenseless, to defile the innocent and spit in Gods image twisting love and the creation of life into hate and the destruction of it i.e. its satanic.

>>17895167
He heckin posted it!!!

>>17894982 (OP)
>I shall make a small proportion of the adult population be sexually attracted to children
You mean roughly 1/4th of the male population?

>>17894982 (OP)
If people were given no flaws, it wouldnt be much of a test would it? All people are sinners but the big difference is whether people embrace their sins or fight against their sins
God knows the good will strive towards the right path regardless of what satanic temptations stand before them

>>17895219
why does an omniscient being need to perform "tests" if he already knows what will happen

>>17895224
The tests arent about confirmation for God, they are about helping the souls of people grow. People only grow when they are faced with hardship

>>17895219
>and for the next step in my plan to test each individual, I will ensure most humans bypass the test by dying in utero or as infants or as children and get a free ticket to heaven as a result

>>17895235
Haven wouldnt be the same without cute goofy Cherubim flying around

>>17895235
Unfairness obviously exists in this world, there are even people born with nothing and people born with everything. God wishes to see if people will use unfairness as an excuse to not even try to be good people or if they will overcome the envy in their heart

>>17895248
What does the man with everything have to overcome? Or does he just exist as a prop doomed to damnation because rich people le bad (even though God made them rich in the first place)

>>17895230
Why do they need hardship to grow?

>>17894982 (OP)
No one is sexually attracted to children. They just enjoy torturing others and lack the intelligence or fortitude to prevent themselves from doing so.

>>17895252
Their test is to give up their wealth for the good of all. Considering how few rich people in succeed in doing that, their test is even more difficult than the men with nothing as there are plenty of good men who have nothing
This is to balance out the comfort they were given in life

>>17895257
There is a beauty for the process of something that the end result by itself doesnt offer. If growth simply happened without difficulty, it wouldnt be meaningful.

Reality is a story created by God and what good is a story without conflict or a story that only has an end? The whole thing is what makes it beautiful

>>17895257
Making mistakes or having things blow up in your face is basically the only way to learn.

>>17895167
God's smartest and most honest keyboard warrior

>>17895271
>If growth simply happened without difficulty, it wouldnt be meaningful.
why did god decide this
>Reality is a story created by God
who is the story for and why does it require conflict and suffering for it to be meaningful or beautiful to whoever it's for

>>17895274
Why is it the only way to learn?

>>17894982 (OP)
>he definitely does not condone it
Except he does he literally says to rape the young girls so they are forced to be your property and he himself impregnated an under age girl that was suppose to be some man's wife.

>>17895280
Im afraid that this is where my larp comes to an end. Has any christian ever gave you an answer that is not "God knows what is necessary, you dont"?

I really want to figure out if there is a path around the "why didnt god just make it differently?" roadblock

>>17895219
why do children have to be irreparably traumatised by being used as temptation bait by God to test other people.
Seems pretty evil.

>>17895303
>I really want to figure out if there is a path around the "why didnt god just make it differently?" roadblock
There isn't. And they believe God is good as a cope, because the possibility that God is evil is too horrifying to comprehend (even though it's true)

>>17895271
>>17895274
So god itself, especially the human avatar, isn't very intelligent, meaningful, mature, or moral since it can create without bound and there is no real mechanism to makes some immortal all powerful person supported by a deus ex machina face hardship?

>>17895304
Same with murder, why does free will only allow Cain to murder Abel, but it doesn't allow Abel to survive Cain's jealous, did Abel initiate the process because he wanted to be murdered of his own free will, is god punishing the children because they of their own free will wanted to be used that way?

>>17894982 (OP)
What's the next step of your master plan?

>>17895290
Because you are not born omniscient

>>17895310
Have you ever considered that creating a being who knows everything important already and has no need to learn from from their mistakes or others is fundamentally separate from the corporeal form you inhabit.

>>17895365
So that is a yes, god is just like some old giant immature retarded child that can't comprehend its own actions or be empathetic to others because of its own infallibility and lack of accountability or consequence?

>>17895361
So the only reason god created beings that aren't omniscient themselves was so that they would be forced to face hardships that god himself could not ever possibly have to suffer?

>>17895290
Well there's divine revelation too. Of course God forgot to mention the no pedo rule tee hee

>>17895361
Why?

>>17895382
If merely existing forces you to engage with unpleasant dilemmas then maybe you understand why you are "forced" to do so.

>>17895412
Why?

>>17895415
Grammatically the why? doesn't make sense here anon

>>17895422
>why you are "forced" to do so.
If that is the case, its only because your original claim did not grammatically make sense.

>>17895380
If you assume God exists, and he made you, then you cannot surpass his abilities.

>>17895430
what a dilemma!

>>17894982 (OP)
No mainstream religion claims God designed pedophilia. Theodicies blame free will or corruption of nature (Romans 5:12). Most believers sidestep by saying "sin broke the world, not God's intent".

>>17895433
Then why did I surpass the abilities of my parents?

>>17895436
So your dilemma is that you don't know the answer to the question you said I maybe understand because you yourself can't even makes sense of what you were trying to say in the first place?

>>17895441
>Theodicies blame free will or corruption of nature
Who made free will and decided to corrupt nature?

>>17895456
Humans. God made everything perfect.

>>17895448
You are not more the the whole of your parts in terms of the important bits when it comes to creation. You can surpass your parents because they gave you a better life to live, or because they achieved very little and surpassing them is not difficult. You also might have been better than them because all they did was fuck, and you came out.

>>17895461
How can it be perfect if it was so easy to corrupt, do you just not understand that perfection and corruption are antonyms?

>>17895463
>You can surpass your parents because they gave you a better life to live
But god purposely gave humans a worse life to live, so my parents are better at empathy than god who specifically wants his children to fail instead of doing its best to provide a better life?

>>17895453
Listen man, you have a bone to pick with the almighty because your penis is small or something, I don't know. Take a chill pill and realize that lashing out at other humans when they won't entertain you does not mean that your reason is bulletproof or even sound, reflect on metaphysical questions, you might find it beneficial.

>>17895469
God and your parents are different.

>>17895470
So now you have to do ad hominems to try to distract from the fact that you just admitted that your retarded nonsense doesn't even makes sense to you?

>>17895475
>an offhand exasperated comment is actually an ad hominem

I find it especially funny because you were trying to troll and lasted all of a couple posts before you became hopelessly emotional.

>>17895502
Sure, entirely giving up on your argument so you can talk about anger and small weiners is totally not an ad hominem, you are totally not the one just projecting your own situation, thinking of anger and small penises unprompted when you couldn't come up with a logical reply had nothing to do with you dealing with your emotional breakdown at all.

How long do you think it will take you to figure out that you are the only one experience the dilemma because it your your (lack of) logic that is creating it in the first place?

>>17895521
This all started because I told you that continuing to ask why didn't make sense

>>17895534
No, you falsely said asking why wasn't grammatically correct when you yourself directly set it up as a why by saying anon should maybe know why while realizing that you yourself have no idea why because you are just making shit up on the spot without trying to make sense of it first.

>>17895547
Asking "Why?" did not make sense grammatically anon. Are you OP, I am genuinely curious?

>>17894982 (OP)
>in fact, I will create and entire island of them

>>17895167
so why did the sky jew create people like that?

>>17895230
why did the sky jew make people only be able to grow from sadists and pedos?

>>17895248
why does he wish to see that?

>>17895270
why did the sky jew make people who lack intelligence and self control?

>>17895554
Except it clearly does.
>maybe you understand why you are "forced" to do so.
>Why?
>durr why doesn't make sense to thing I just specifically said was a why situation.

>>17895589
Everyone is lacking in intelligence and self control, even you

>>17895593
It was a rhetorical question

>>17895618
Then its not a grammar issue, the issue is that you rushed to pose a question whose answer you didn't know yourself and didn't want answered even though you said maybe anon knows while not knowing the answer yourself.

>>17895627
>Then its not a grammar issue

It is when you ask "Why?"

>>17895633
Nope, when you say I might now why something is the way it is, the only logical question is a why question to confirm if your why answer is the same as the why answer you wanted me to come up with.

>>17895643
>I might now

You might now what? I would assume a verb following this but idk.

>>17895661
now was clearly suppose to be know, I guess your LLM based "logic" can't account for typos

>>17895672
>now was clearly suppose to be know
original
>now was clearly supposed to be know

Tell me, little bird, do you want to predate upon children?

>>17895695
No, but you are obviously desperate to move the goal posts to grammar since your logic has completely failed you and you have no answer for the why question you originally posed >>17895412.

>>17895726
Could you please, for me, say that pedophilia is the most disgusting practice imaginable. I want your strongest condemnation.

>>17895729
Pedophilia is the most disgusting practice imaginable and you are an unimaginably disgusting person for trying to use it as fodder to change the subject and distract from the fact that you lost your retarded argument about your imaginary friend who is documented as having encouraged pedophilia and impregnated an underage girl with himself.

>>17895748
I feel a deep and sincere joy, all our qualms are settled, thank you for condemning those creatures.

>>17895752
Ok but please stop worshiping the imaginary first one.

>>17895759
I will always worship my God, it is merely a characteristic of my soul. Surely you can forgive me for that?

>>17894982 (OP)
KEEP TROLLIN' TROLLIN' TROLLIN'!!!!1!!!11!11

>>17895769
Did you forgive the pedo that raped you as a child and traumatized your soul into needing an imaginary supreme pedo daddy watching over you for all of time?

>>17895782
No such person existed, I don't know if I would forgive them, but we are past our enmity now, no?

>>17895784
Sure they didn't, once you get through therapy and unlock the your repressed memories that constantly keep pedos on top of your mind, will you forgive the one who made you that way?

>>17895788
I'm not sure I follow

>>17895576
>why does God do X?????
idk ask him oh wait he ignores you anyway lmao

>>17895729
>>17895748
The theory that consensual sexual relations between adults and children causes psychological harm to the younger participant is a debunked, empirically invalid pseudoscience rooted in antisexualism. Enjoyable sexual experiences are not traumatic.

Michael Bailey, PhD:
>Indeed, the best scientific evidence suggests that the most typical experiences considered childhood sexual abuse may not be as harmful as most people think. Specifically, sexual activity that children engage in voluntarily (albeit illegally) with adults is nearly uncorrelated with undesirable outcomes

James Cantor, PhD:
>The research is much more consistent with the conclusion that harm is caused instead by coercion, manipulation, secrecy, and by courting kids who already have problems, not the sexual interactions per se.

Bruce Rind, PhD:
>Self-reported reactions to and effects from CSA indicated that negative effects were neither pervasive nor typically intense, and that men reacted much less negatively than women. The college data were completely consistent with data from national samples. Basic beliefs about CSA in the general population were not supported.

Pic related is a comprehensive, non-biased overview of the literature on outcomes of adult-child sex.

>>17895799
1/3rd of your citations require the reader to accept Rind.

>>17895789
That makes two of us since I don't follow how a pedo god worshiper like could actually possibly think that pedos are the most disgusting when your god never even made rules against pedophilia and spent more time voicing his disgust for people who wore two types of fabric than pedos.

>>17895799
>posts a poorly sized screenshot of a pedophile website
>ummm chud you need to accept this as irrefutable evidence that raping children is ok

>>17895804
Maybe you see now just how disparate me and pedophilia truly are

>>17895809
No I don't see how worshiping pedos makes you that much different from them when it makes you an enabler because you glorify an alpha pedo who cares more about fashion sense than preventing children from getting molested by adults.

>>17895820
Read what this thing has to say >>17895799

Does it horrify you? If so we have common cause.

>>17895824
Our reactions are entirely different though since you want to just go into flight mod and enable that by glorifying a pedo master and I go into fight mode and would like that nonsense to stop and for people like you to stop worshiping the retarded bullshit that enables it.

>>17895827
If you want that vile character to stop then you must extinguish him

>>17895831
You can't extinguish imaginary characters, you can only try to convince the retards who larp as their followers to stop enabling the bullshit they stand for in real life.

>>17895839
He is real, he lives with his parents. A bungalow or a similar situation, his presence calls forth your classification.

>>17895845
Sure and you can totally point out the bungalow on a map so people can do something about it, you aren't going to simply keep protecting the pedo scum like the trash person you are.

>>17895847
I will point it out in heart beat, but he does a poor job of hiding himself. You could find him with a determined google search.

>>17895851
Sure larper, good luck continuing to protect the pedos while trying to blend in with the ones seeking to rid the world of them, your time on this earth is rapidly coming to an end.

>>17895860
He and aussie pedo are the same person. Which city he lives in is hardest to determine, but given the scale of the continent he is easy to find.

>>17895868
So now not only is god the first pedo, he is also some aussie pedo you are obsessed with?

>>17895871
Maybe! I tried to save you. You will be with him soon.

>>17895871
He gets really upset when you mention the fact that he has schizophrenia btw

>>17895874
No, you tried to convert me into a pedo enabler, but you and >>17895799 are the only ones ITT who want to be one the side of pedos, I wouldn't be surprised if they are both your posts and that is why you tried to rant about samefaggory.

>>17895878
Then saving you is impossible

>>17895230
If I'm an omnipotent gardener, why don't I just plant a tree and make it grow up with a snap of my finger? Why is growth even necessary?

>>17895881
Yes it is impossible for you to turn me into a pedo enabler like you, so you should just stop worshiping a king pedo.

>>17895885
why doesn't god Grow me!!!!

>>17895886
You enable him automatically

>>17895890
No, I denounce imaginary pedos, real pedos and their retarded enablers like you and will continue to speak out against you all while you try to spread your disgusting pedo influence.

>>17895412
Gee my child having cancer and me being abducted by some serial killer to get tortured to death sure are unfortunate dilemmas.

>>17895894
it sure is

>>17895441
>broke the world, not God's intent
Surely he can fix it, then? Why doesn't he do so?

>>17895893
Stomp on their chest, it is simple

>>17895902
Ok gpt1.1

>>17895903
Find the pedophiles, slaughter them

>>17895230
*circkets*
This is a crap theodicy, and there's no point in posting bullshit like this when you respond to critiques

>>17894982 (OP)
>also I will make a disproportional number of them my institutional representatives on earth so that non-believers associate fucking children with my personal fanclub, this will surely help saving as many souls as possible

>>17895887
hurricanes and earthquakes happen because you touch yourself at night!!!!

>>17894982 (OP)
repeat with me xirsters in christ
>the stepfather
>the stepson
>the holy cuckerion
>amen
ALELUYA, ALELUYA XIRSTERS INCHRISTKEKERY!
Kmtnr

>>17895887
Because if he doesn't he's not benevolent and thus not worthy of veneration. It really is quite simple.

>>17895906
There is no point when larpers like you are lining up behind an imaginary king pedo to help create more generations of pedos to take their place.

>>17894982 (OP)
wait it gets worse, he personally elects those as priests, it doesn't stop there either, he puts those priests in vharge of orphanages, the absolute madman. play jewish games win jewish prizes

>>17895769
And yet if you discovered by hypothetical means that there was definitely no such entity, the thing you allude to by "your soul" would be unchanged? Only your feelings about it would be changed? Closet-nihilism.

>>17895306
Its way worse than that, he is utterly inhuman and uncaring eldritch horror.