Thread 17907848

Did the Council of Trent finalise the canon of scripture or did it just state which books were infallibly deemed canonical with the possibility of the addition of more?

Anyone?

>>17907848 (OP)
lots of bible books floating around back then
so the big wigs did a council of nicea
and wrote the nicene creed
the definitive statement of christian theology
and then
they looked at all the bible books floating around and used the nicene creed to weed out the heresies

http://www.kencollins.com/bible/bible-c1.htm

http://ps.edu/council-nicaea-biblical-canon/

http://uscatholic.org/articles/201203/who-decided-which-books-made-it-into-the-bible/

http://www.catholic.com/qa/who-compiled-the-bible-and-when

>>17907848 (OP)
isn't this a cannon in the moscow Kremlin?
What does it have to do with Trient?

>>17909302
Canon = cannon pun

>>17909287
If you’re Catholic, you should edit that pic to have the Catholic Ten Commandments.

>>17910047
ok but I'm not sure what I am kek

The Council of Trent finalized the Catholic canon as it is today, affirming the inclusion of all the books it listed.

>>17910289
So, then, is an ecumenical ‘Tritocanon’ out of the question?

>>17910707
That's just not possible.

>>17907848 (OP)
>>17910289
>Catholic canon
This is the answer.

>>17912304
Baruch, Greek Maccabees, the additions to Daniel, and the prologues and epilogue to the Wisdom of Jesus Ben Sira, are all clearly interpolations of man.

>>17910707
NT is ecumenical
1 OT - extant in Hebrew, includes the Song of Songs which is not holy writ
2 OT - the most conservative Apocrypha canon, which Luther compiled and Rome canonized at Trent, includes extra material >>17912659
3 OT - There's a lot