Thread 17909099

The noble savage myth is RETARDED GARBAGE both with libtards doing this for brown people and far right chuds doing this for white people from thousands of years ago. Rousseau should be brought back to life so that he can be tortured to death.

>>17909099 (OP)
wtf where did u get that pic of me

>>17909148
You're an overweight white women?

>>17909099 (OP)
>both with libtards doing this for brown people and far right chuds doing this for white people from thousands of years ago.
Based

>>17909099 (OP)
It's part of a broader meme that rebels against modernity by idealizing the past. Why not realize our idealization of the past? It's not too late to build beautiful architecture and infrastructure again, to live as farmers and knights and adventurers and marry young and stay with eachother forever and disregard globalism in favor of localism and be proud of your country and do reintroduce rituals and ceremonies and festivities and be a bit amish like using oil lamps and candles instead of light bulbs so we van see the milky way again and night and all the romanticized past things.

>>17909099 (OP)
I thought noble savage was a misconception and nobility referred to the privilege of hunting?

>>17909099 (OP)
You have no idea of what you are talking about.

>>17909099 (OP)
peaceful savages existed - the problem is that they were easy target for savage savages

>>17909099 (OP)
>right wing noble savage
no one does this.
chuds venerate the savagery of their ancestors because modern Whites have been so cowed due to boomerism.

>>17909099 (OP)
Damn, look at the size of that lass, she could certainly toss a stone quite a distance.

>>17911524
No it's because uneducated, illiterate savages are okay as long as they're white because whiteness makes everything ok.

>>17911524
Not true. Lots of people on my side will look at some hut in Poland from 2000 years ago and say RETVRN! Vrag is guilty of this. He'll say civilization was a mistake and then post 50 tweets a day. Whiteness is good, but modern white societies are far superior to older ones. Do you want to live in the era of plague or embrace White futurism?

>>17912416
This
racists treat race like a participation trophy, and this results in them having lower personal standards, which is why most of them are either violent retards or closeted pedos

>>17912423
You're doing the same thing that the BAP-sphere does with respect to antisemitism. Point out a retard that believes something, generalize retardation to that belief, and then call everyone who holds that belief retarded.

>>17912429
>Point out a retard that believes something, generalize retardation to that belief, and then call everyone who holds that belief retarded.
That's what racists do when talking about other races besides their own

>>17912436
It's not though. We point out mean group differences. You can find violent and stupid whites, but blacks are more violent and retarded on average than whites. Also, you don't need to even believe in group differences to be a racist. You can just care for your own race for the sake of itself.

>>17912440
>but blacks are more violent and retarded on average than whites.
But this is also a Gamblers Fallacy because it ignores confounding factors that can influence these averages both in the past as well as into the future. You assert already that there was somehow a significant evolutionary divergance between blacks and whites within a 50,000 year timeframe which is absolutely asinine, but then you selectively choose to believe this evolution magically stopped after the 18th century for no reason. There is no reason why intelligent black populations couldn't exist simply by raising their standard of living and having them selectively breed to produce offspring to maintain said higher standard of living. In the real world we can actually see this happening. IQ is up across the board since the end of Jim Crow laws because blacks now have more economic opportunity. You also erroneously believe that IQ is purely genetic and cannot be influenced by other factors such as nutrition

>>17912453
I don't want that to change because I like white people and want us to rule the world. Just for no reason other than that I like white people. I don't need to justify it. Also let's be real, are we really going to engage in a large scale eugenics campaign to raise the black IQ?

>>17912461
To clarify, do you like white people and want white people to rule the world, or do you like white culture and simply want white culture to rule the world?
Because if the former, then you're just proving my point that to you race is just a participation trophy and have no regard for culture itself.

>>17912470
The former. Of course I like the accidents of white people, but ultimately it's rooted in in-group preference.
>to you race is just a participation trophy
Not at all. I think race is necessary but not sufficient. I don't think low quality white people are good because they're white.

>>17912478
Savages are bad except when they're white then they're suddenly noble.
Pedophiles are bad except when they're white then they're suddenly ok.
Drug addicts are bad except when they're white then they're suddenly ok.

It's pretty sad because you're advocating for a race to the bottom in terms of racial hygiene and sensibilities by dropping all standards for white people.

>>17912531
Did you miss the part where I explicitly said I'm against that?