Thread 17911052

In feminist theory, why is fictional rape reprehensible when written by men(video games, VNs) but not when it is written by women(romance books, romcoms, etc)?

women should be mass killed only the needed 5% kept alive in breeding grounds to maintain a male only society

Women don't see rape they see proviosion

Feminist women just hate men and think that women should be gatekeepers of male boners who get to decide what men are allowed to be attracted to.

A lot of feminist authors kind of tell a watered-down story of rape, but men just tell it like it is.

>>17911056
it's quite easy to do the opposite: have a few males with good genetics (for women, not necessarily males) who are purposely given only daily minimum required calories and as little protein as possible as well as a lot of testosterone increasing food so that they don't have the protein required for muscle, but have good semen production instead. A single male can impregnate multiple women a day, so just have them be sex slaves for women (if the women are rich and can pay for coital impregnation) or hook them up to sperm bank milking machines (for the more poor women who can only afford artificial impregnation). A male can also be easily rendered nearly incapable of almost all sexual acts where the male is dominant by use of a chastity cage, and it also breeds submissiveness and the loss of control in the male. Males, by virtue of their greater resilience in their bodies, can also suffer more, thus allowing them to render their servitude and sexual services more easily for the pleasure of women as opposed to the other way around.

>>17911052 (OP)
I think it’s more that they just want to draft men and so they’re taking away all their toys until they’re whipped and bored enough to comply. I’m gonna have to tap the sign with this one, boys

>>17912392
All the more reason for a matriarchal society I guess. It happened historically as men with their aggressiveness and risk-taking were more likely to die than women, and men have an instinct to sacrifice themselves and protect the woman. Reducing society to 5% men is easy, only the most genetically advantageous for women need to be preserved and the rest can go kill themselves for honor and glory in some war.

>>17911052 (OP)
Who told you that. Hardcore feminists think it's all bad. And everyone else doesn't care who writes it as long as it's not shit.

>>17912387
Even if thats the case you can kiss cultural institutions goodbye. Its been demonstrated repeatedly that women cannot keep a society together independent of men, you will see it descend into anarchy really quickly. Maybe Hobbes' state of nature argument was off to shaky grounds since no one could conceive of such a thing prior to feminism. When he imagined the "state of nature" it was implied that it would contain men.

>>17913196
Not so fast>>17913293

Not all feminists are the same. The anti-porn wing of radical feminism is very consistent on its critique of porn, smut, hentai, prostitution and whatever else you might think of, but of course you have millions of women who wouldn't belong to that category.
But since you didn't make the question any more specific, all I can give you in return is a blurry generalisation. You could argue that there is a difference between men's sadistic fantasies and women's masochistic fantasies. To fantasize harming someone would be worse, or at least moe concerning than fantasizing being harmed.

And it doesn't help that the average person, man or woman, tends to discuss everything in terms of gut feelings. A lot of the current day online war of the sexes we're seeing is just men and women getting too much information on the inner thoughts of the other groups and feeling angry. Women shouldn't hear what men say at the pub and men shouldn't hear what women say in the salon. Maybe you like discussing which cartoon teenage girl is hotter in /a/ or gooning to NTR on /h/. Whatever works for you. At worst, we'll find you odd and laugh at your foot fetish. But a woman seeing that would feel as disgusted and repulsed as we do reading the summaries of women's smut novels.

>>17913490
>Not all feminists are the same.
This. People constantly lump all feminisms as one.
>why did feminism change from Sarkeesian puritanism to OF sexualization???
It didn‘t

>>17911052 (OP)
>thread about women
>everyone hates women
>thread about race
>ummm ackshually
Why is /his/ like this? Is it all trannies?

>>17911052 (OP)
She's a fine authoress, and that's the end of it

>>17911056
BASED

>>17912387
And in what world are men, who make up the vast majority of the military globally especially combat troops, going to let women exterminate them? It is infinitely more likely that men would just put women back in their place as slaves to men.

>>17911052 (OP)
even racial fetishism is okay when women do it

>>17911052 (OP)
If you fantasize about raping people, it implies that you have the intention to go out and rape someone, ie. to commit a crime.

If you fantasize about getting raped, it doesn't imply that you have the intention of committing a crime.

It's like buying a crowbar to rob a house vs. leaving your house open hoping you get robbed.

>>17911052 (OP)
>In feminist theory, why is fictional rape reprehensible when written by men(video games, VNs) but not when it is written by women(romance books, romcoms, etc)?

They don't like it when it's written by women either. You can download and read Dworkin's "Pornography". The main argument she makes is that rape porn&pornography aren't just fantasies, they're propaganda for the dominant order of things.

>>17913883
>propaganda for the dominant order of things.
They should just admit its a sin and that the timeless morality is correct. Yet feminists argue for dressing immodestly and for all kinds of impure lifestyles which is part of the 'sexual liberated' culture which porn is just another part of.

>>17913925
>timeless morality
The Sumerians had holy temple prostitutes.
By seniority, whores are blessed and nuns are apostates.

>>17913925
The timeless morality isn't very divergent from the morality of pornography, as far as feminism is concerned.

>>17911052 (OP)
Because most works made by men are made by men who aren't sexually attractive. If pic related wrote a rape story it would sell like hot cakes among femgroids. At best some may denounce it to virtue signal, but they'd secretly have their fingers knuckle deep in their pussies while thinking about it (and the author)

>>17911052 (OP)
Well thats what matriarchy will give you