>>17913651 (OP)
We were always like this. Let me introduce you the concept of "Wergeld". Somehow and without any central authority or proto-EU-like Federation, the Germanics came up with Wergeld/blood money, while the Italians, Greeks and Romans even up until the Renaissance would engange in eternal blood feuds. It worked like this. Usually when you a Germanic man kills another Germanic man, the family of the victim would swear vengance. The women would make sure to educate their kids very early on about WHO wronged their family, WHERE they lived and WHY they must pay. You also have to defend your family. Even if your brother is a stupid idiot, who starts feuds with other families, you may critize him publicly for his retardness, but it would be unthinkable to just abandon him and let him fight out these feuds on your own.
However a way to circumvent all that bullshit is to pay blood money. When you kill someone, you go to his closest relatives and leave a certain amount of money with them. If the man you killed was a lazy NEET you wouldn't have to pay as much. If he was a valuable hunter and respectful member of the community, you'd have to pay more. There are actually established rules for this, which all participants would know about.
Tell me how this doesn't strike you as autistic.
>>17913663
Those tribes were Germanics, not Germans. Every German is Germanic, but not every Germanic is German.
>>17913679
Bro, we tried to become the world's only Superpower just 80 years ago. How are we not still war-like?
>>17913721
>continues to live in rural fortifications, instead of moving to the cities where the money is
>hunts, trains for war, feasts and feuds all day
>lets the big cities from Roman times be ruled by bishops
The secret to Europe's success was for the Germanic Nobility to never be fully civilized.