Thread 17919215

They would have been significantly more prosperous, educated, literate, socially equal and civilized if they had had a communist revolution in the 20th century.
Medieval superstition and societal poison like casteism should have been removed violently.

>>17919215 (OP)
True, unfortunately for most of the 3rd world the choice is either a brutal dictatorship that forces the subhumans to poo in the loo and maintain some semblance of law and order or a chaotic lawless shithole with a leadership that only cares about filling its own pockets.

>>17919215 (OP)
Wrong map.

>>17919259
The line of control looks accurate to me.

>>17919215 (OP)
>india had more people dying from "normal" malnutrition and child mortality than china had during the "catastrophic famine" of the great leap forward
Really makes you think

>>17919319
Maliciously false.

>>17919334
Nope.

>>17919215 (OP)
oh cripes the pajeets have found /his/

>>17919884
No pajeet would call their glorious Dharma and its caste system medieval garbage.

>>17919215 (OP)
The only successful state(Kerala) has a high Christian population and has ruled been Communists since it's statehood
Makes you think

>>17919215 (OP)
It's cool to look back in retrospect and bemoan the Cultural Revolution, but this is what happens when the "culture" persists. It wasn't about statues or clothes.

>>17919911
Ngl Mao was right

>>17919887
Dharma - broadly refers to a cosmic order, one's duty, and the correct way of living.

Caste system is ancient bullshit, Buddha pointed this out 2500 years ago. Just a form of institutional racism. "I cant touch a Dalit, my karma!" It might have stemmed from the Indo-Aryans not wanting racemixing now that I think about it.

>>17919945
Yet they racemixed anyway lol

>>17919215 (OP)
I can see you haven't read any Indian history lol. Nehru was literally a socialist, he pushed for a highly centralised government, wanted to abolish ethnically-defined states, officially abolished casteism, nationalised the temples, and encouraged secularism. But you can't just impose that kind of stuff unless you're willing to genocide people, these things are very deep-rooted, and the cultural multiplicity of India makes it too difficult to create a truly centralised homogenous nation.

It was only much later with the BJP that you get political Hinduism that officially supported the supersitions and casteism, but that's outside the time scope of this board.

>>17919215 (OP)
>They would have been significantly more prosperous, educated, literate, socially equal and civilized if they had had a communist revolution in the 20th century.
Indian politics was dominated by socialists from 1947 to well into the 21st century
Never talk again

>>17919957
>officially abolished casteism
>writes up a bill on affirmative action
there's a reason tibet's condition is better compared to 90% of india and it's because Mao saved tibet

>>17919968
I didn't say he did a good job at it lol, but assigned places for dalits was specifically to combat casteism. It's not like he thought dalits were superior.

>>17919981
>I didn't say he did a good job at it lol,
>but assigned places for dalits was specifically
alright rakesh, what happened in india after china had the cultural revolution removing retarded generals? india was starving and they sterilized people by force while they introduced the one child policy seeing indian barbarism and being ahead in research

>>17919960
>socialists
Soft handed bitches.

>>17919215 (OP)
If casteism or Hindu superstition was India’s biggest problems Pakistan would be out-performing it. It’s certainly an issue but hardly the reason India is in the absolute state it is in today.

Given this thread claims communism is the answer, it’s ironic that Pakistan was indeed outperforming India until the combination of Zia and the end of the License Raj. Liberalization outperformed planned economies, at least in the case of South Asia.