Thread 17924633

Slavery was a good thing.
Aristocracy and plebeian was a good thing.
The real trickle down is from aristocracys soul to the masses, not from bourgesuis cannibalizing what aristocrats have created.
And no, but what if you were a slave is not an argument.
Aristocrats have higher souls, senses and spirit.
Things plebeian lack.
It is the difference beetwen sentient ape and man.
They exist solely so the Nobleman may elevate himself upon them.
Once they overthrow them they still seek someone to control them be it parents big guv or other

then be a slave. simple as. offer someone to be your master and there you have it, your precious slavery

The correct way is uplifting the plebs to become aristocrats, not the other way around. This is doable as seen in medieval era places like Vizcay in Spain and their low nobility population, fueros, etc

>>17924633 (OP)
This is pure, unfiltered elitist cope. Slavery and aristocracy weren't "good"... They were brutal systems where the powerful exploited the weak. The idea that nobles have "higher souls" is just narcissistic fantasy. History shows that when the oppressed rise up, it's because they're done being crushed under some self-proclaimed *superior's* boot. No one's born to be your stepping stone.

>>17924789
See how women live now without being slave to man.
They lack being dominated and seek that.
See normal cattles and tell me they arent meant to be used as a stepping stool.
>>17924709
Not how it works, im an aristocrat not a slave.
>>17924779
You cant teach a dog to do self reflection, but you can teach it to immitate and mimick it.
Its a bad copy of aristocracy, just see What millionaires do, pathetic.

>>17924789
>This is pure, unfiltered elitist cope.
Goes to public school
>Slavery and aristocracy weren't "good"...
Pays half his earnings in taxes
>They were brutal systems where the powerful exploited the weak.
Hundreds of psychopathic fighting age men housed in your community
>The idea that nobles have "higher souls" is just narcissistic fantasy.
Blackrock buys up all real property making it impossible to own a home
>History shows that when the oppressed rise up
Women simultaneously taught to be high achievers and also never to date men below them
>it's because they're done being crushed under some self-proclaimed *superior's* boot
Even when they do, they are taught that breeding is icky and being childless is freedom
>No one's born to be your stepping stone.
Works all his life until the grave with no wife, no children and no property, just an ever growing gap between the wealthy and you

>>17924803
You probably thought you were making some kind of point here

>>17924809
You are already a slave, nigga. Wake up.

Materialists are unable to see inside their soul, much less the soul of others.
In an aristocracy some persons have a great deal to live for. In a democracy most persons have a little to live for. In an ochlocracy nobody has anything to live for.

Aristocracy alone is capable of creating thoughts and objects of value. Everyone, I fancy, will admit that such a state must precede democracy or ochlocracy in order to build the original culture. Fewer are willing to admit the cognate truth that democracies and ochlocracies merely subsist parasitically on the aristocracies they overthrow, gradually using up the aesthetic and intellectual resources which autocracy bequeathed them and which they never could have created for themselves. The rate of squandering depends upon the completeness of the departure from aristocracy. Where the old spirit lingers, the process of deterioration may be very slow indeed—certain belated additions compensating for the decline. But where the rabble gain full sway taste is certain to vanish, and dulness reigns darkly triumphant over the ruins of culture.

We need both downward mobility for higher class and upward mobility for lower class for society to thrive.
Elitism of slavery and aristocracy introduces unneeded rigidness which does not even cover drawbacks of modern "egalitarianism".

>>17924831
>We need both downward mobility for higher class and upward mobility for lower class for society to thrive.
This. Wealth redistribution and affirmative action programs are essential to a healthy society

>>17924847
But also we need to admit:
Lower class should embrace accountability for their own lives and admit that the most of anyone's shortcomings are not random but a consequence of their own poor life choices.
Some people does not recognize it, becoming a clear burden to society.
Some people should be allowed to fail and be culled.

It can be tolerable as long as the aristocrats are my ethnic in-group. If not, they naturally need to be expulsed

>>17924796
>SAAAAR I AM BRAHMIN NOT DALIT
get back in the cagie little bro

>>17924863
> It can be tolerable
That is the whole point - it is not up to you to decide what and who is tolerable.
> If not, they naturally need to be expulsed
Peasant and slave chimpouts have low win ratio.

>>17924863
> the aristocrats are my ethnic in-group
that's not how aristocracy worked historially, nobles often weren't in-group and even when they were, they often LARP'ed (we descended from le greeks/scythians/whatever) as foreigners to be above peasants

>slavery was a good thing
You can still experience. There are plenty of human trafficking rings operating in Asia. Just find one, apply for the suspiciously well-paying job in Malaysia, and have fun being a slave in Myanmar.

>>17924796
>I will be the 0.01% elite that benefits from exploiting the 99.99%!
at least this dumb /pol/tranny frogposter admits it. makes it easier to write you off as room temp iq