Thread 17925756

How do White Nationalists not get a neurotic panic attack when reading about European history? 95% of it was different white people killing each other which was based and epic because it revolves around individual persons, not trite collective categories.

wars weren't that common, so I guess these "white nationalists" are intelligent and realize it was not like game of thrones

>>17925756 (OP)
I do get real mad reading about the 30 years war and all the White people who died because other Whites were not worshiping the rabbi Jesus correctly.

>>17925766
Open a history book or better yet read primary sources about Antiquity, the Middle Ages, or Modern Age. Or look into what research we've got for prehistory lmfao.
>>17925767
Well I'm sorry that our default state isn't just sitting around holding hands and singing kumbaya. Why would we ever do that?

>>17925756 (OP)
I find European history barbaric. But there was also a system that people respected. And a system that worked for some time. Thought the brilliance of hindsight we can see places where they failed, but I dare not criticize them for it. What transpired later was most peculiar

Martially I respect it as people good at their craft duking it out. Collecting knights and royalty like souvenirs for ransom. Lower casualty rates. Financially it was retarded and was probably the equivalent of footy football to them or something

>>17925774
>read primary sources about Antiquity, the Middle Ages, or Modern Age
Wars decades or centuries apart confined to small areas, battles involving less than 1/1000th of the population. Just because there was a war doesn't mean the entire country erupted into flame.

>>17925920
What’s with this pussified “nothing ever happens” reading of history? Did chudsters take their view of the present day and start projecting it onto all other periods in time?

>>17925955
These are just the facts, if you were a random person in Europe between 1100 to 1500 it is unlikely you'd actually be in a warzone during your lifetime. Your biggest threats would be disease and the occasional natural famine. War was expensive, especially for an agrarian society where 95% of the population had to till the soil just to subsist, the middle ages just didn't work the way you imagine.

>>17925756 (OP)
How do you think white people got so good at war? They practiced on each other for thousands of years, then they went out and stomped the rest of the world.

>>17925756 (OP)
>WHITE POWERRRRRRRR

Because they are descendants of those people.

Most just cherry pick certain moments where they aren't killing each other, or they'll just glorify the killing as "friendly competition".

There is no such thing as white nationalism. It’s a mask for nordicist exterminationism (Nazism) that seeks to annihilate Slavic and Mediterranean peoples under the guise of anti immigration nativist propaganda. They celebrate those battles when Germanics won and killed Slavic and Mediterranean races on the battlefield.

>>17926248
This
Pan-Germanism and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race

>>17926248
>It’s a mask for nordicist exterminationism (Nazism) that seeks to annihilate Slavic and Mediterranean peoples under the guise of anti immigration nativist propaganda
least hysterical /his/poster

>>17925756 (OP)
White nationalists tend to be far better educated on history than most....

Okay, let me rephrase that. It's a very polarized community.

There's 2 kinds of white nationalists. The dumbest methhead motherfuckers you'll ever meet and some reasonably bright dudes (usually the bright white nationalists don't broadcast the fact in most cases, they also don't associate with the dimwitted Aryan Nation ghetto white nationalists).

In the event that you're talking about the literate type of white nationalist, they're quite well read on many things. History usually included.

White nationalists love Euro history. They usually also are particularly proud of the history of their ancestral lands. Yeah, it's about white people killing each other, so what? I guess I don't understand what you're getting at OP.

>>17926248
Most American white nationalists I've met have no beef with Slavs or Mediterranean Euros. Many have no beef with Asians.

American white nationalists have a beef with blacks and Jews typically. Mexicans sometimes (often depends on where they live in the US).

White nationalism in the US is NOT even remotely German supremacism. Even most white guys rocking the swastika realizes they would not live up to Hitler's ideals.

>>17926321
If they understand/read history then they probably realize that being a white nationalist is retarded.

>>17925963
Okay have fun attacking strawmen.
>>17926248
Ngl the “Med supremacist” coal I keep seeing posted here does tempt me into becoming a Nordicist…

>>17925756 (OP)
Most 'white nationalists' are American, therefore they have no idea about the history of Europe beyond a particularly slanted and inaccurate view of the period between 1934 and 1945. They're also usually, from what I've seen, advocates of the 'one drop' rule who really ought to have looked further into their own family trees before taking that position.

>>17926044
>reee integration failed since not enough people are race mixing
The point wasn't to race mix chudtard, it was to remove legal/movement/civil barriers to equal access to the fruits of the country.

>>17925756 (OP)
White nationalists are typically Americans, most of whom don't care about European history. European 'white nationalists' are typically just people who don't want a hundred million arabs and somalis in their country. They don't have some overarching VGH EVROPA fantasies, they like their own nation states, they just don't want darkies anywhere near them.

>>17925756 (OP)
I remember reading an article on Counter Currents (WN site) from like last year, where the author wrote that from today’s perspective there is indeed something sickening about going to Europe and seeing all those statues erected in honor of white people who led wars against other white people

>>17925756 (OP)
Reading European history puts white nationalism in a different light, but it also delegitimizes intersectionalism (or "wokeness", whatever you want to call it), because white people oppressed each other far more than they oppressed brown people. Colonization is almost like an afterthought.

>>17925756 (OP)
>which was based and epic because it revolves around individual persons, not trite collective categories.
What?

>>17925756 (OP)
Most of history consists of similar groups of people fighting and killing each other , Europeans against Europeans, Asians against Asians, Middle Easterners against other Middle Easterners, and so on.

>>17926956
What don’t you understand?

>>17927129
>wars were "around individual persons"
What?

>>17926525
There was nothing exceptional about European oppression, public torture was carried out throughout the Islamic world and China, the Zulus loved impaling people, the Maori massacred the Moriori et cetera..

If you wanted to determine who was inherently more oppressive you'd have to have some means of quantifying oppression levels and avoid mathematical errors. For example if 800 people are murdered in Costa Rica and 900 in France, does that make France a more murderous society? To be honest most people are too riddled with fallacious thinking to even begin to tackle this subject.

>>17927141
Yeah? Look at most medieval wars for example.

>>17925756 (OP)
History makes no sense if you look at it through the lens of ''race'', this is why wignats try to twist history so it adheres to their modern prejudices, they aren't interested in actual history

>>17926449
>to equal access to the fruits of the country
wrong again
it was to force "equal outcome" on disparate communites

>>17925756 (OP)
Nobody actually cares about violence beyond demonizing another group

>>17926516
Why wouldn’t they celebrate Nelson? They all think Spaniards are brown Moors anyways.