← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 17932329

19 posts 8 images /his/
Anonymous No.17932329 >>17932381 >>17933490 >>17933503 >>17934211 >>17934287 >>17934799
>collaboration with nazis, men
QUISLING!! WE WILL HANG YOU
>collaboration with nazis, women
they were victims of a terrible war and their "liberation" resulted in further shame and torment.

what explains this?
Anonymous No.17932352
Sexism.
Anonymous No.17932381 >>17935322 >>17935330
>>17932329 (OP)
Spreading your legs for the enemy is a fairly harmless form of collaboration desu, atleast in the short term.
Anonymous No.17933406
bump
Anonymous No.17933490
>>17932329 (OP)
Holding women accountable for anything goes against European values.
Anonymous No.17933503 >>17934311
>>17932329 (OP)
>Collaboration
What is this leftist concept? Was it "collaboration" when the Germans agreed to the terms of surrender of the allies? It is honoring your duty as a conquered subject to obey the whims of the conqueror, only a resentful cretin would find this disagreeable.

Rather it should be considered a war crime to rebel against the occupational government, as that would be anti-civilizational activity and little more than terrorism.
Anonymous No.17934211
>>17932329 (OP)
> what explains this?
Feminism
Anonymous No.17934287
>>17932329 (OP)
Because it was fundamentally about fucking not collaboration, and the feelings of humiliation and conquest that having your women by occupation troops fucked engendered in the male population. Nobody would have given a shit if it was all men fucking sexy off-duty Nazi bitches.
Anonymous No.17934292 >>17934893
Modern Europe and whitewashing nazi collaborators, what's new?
poleGOD No.17934311 >>17934378
>>17933503
Enjoy having your name being synonymous with "traitor" for hundreds of years to come
Anonymous No.17934378 >>17934396 >>17934900
>>17934311
So would you say if their was a popular uprising in Germany after ww2 ended you would agree they were justified? Why or why not?
poleGOD No.17934396 >>17934900 >>17935333
>>17934378
Firstly, Nazism is a criminal ideology that calls for the genocide or enslavement of entire nations. Therefore, if they were to continue to fight for those ideals, I wouldn't consider it justifiable
Secondly, I suppose it would be justifiable for them if they really felt that way, but fortunately, everyone despised fagtler in 1945 so i don't see this happening
Anonymous No.17934799
>>17932329 (OP)
More like
>Can krauts fight?
>Yes
>noooo my kraut overlord, don't kill us, we will bend over and spread our wives' daughters' legs before you, we will be eternally loyal to the thousand-year-reich

>No
>GLORY TO ANTIFASCISM, KILL THOSE GERMAN OCCUPIERS (read: disabled, women, elderly, children)
>KILL THOSE WHAMEN WHO SLEPT WITH NATSEEES (read: forget about how men bent over the nation and actually worked hard for the krauts during occupation)

You can see it, in one way or another, with every occupied country - France, Denmark, Czechoslovakia, Norway...
Same thing, by the way applies with former Warsaw Pact countries as well, the amount of former commie - not just commie, the most rabid and faggy activists - who burned their partbilets and became rabid nationalists or "free market" cultists makes me want to retch.
If Putin occupies those countries, these faggots will stand in fucking line to french kiss his ass. Cowardly opportunistic fags with no principles, honor, or idea.
Anonymous No.17934893
>>17934292
Bottom is right though
Anonymous No.17934900
>>17934396
>Criminal ideology
Like communusm? >>>17934378
>calls for the genocide or enslavement of entire nations.
Like communism? But you can wave the hammer and sickle all you want, but the second someone trots out a swastika it's a hate crime. Make it make sense.

>my murderous totalitarian ideology is better than yours
No they are both vile
Anonymous No.17934914
If the men in your country were happy to submit to the occupying government and working in industries to supply for their war effort than its only logical that they should offer their daughters and wives to the occupying men. You live in a fundamentally cuckolded country and should feel proud to know that atleast your woman are feminine enough to submit to the real men.
Anonymous No.17935322
>>17932381
This is why you are a cuck.
Anonymous No.17935330
>>17932381
what is the actual crime of collaboration if your enemy ends up replacing you genetically anyway?
If you draw back why collaboration is bad ultimately you arrive at your in-group being subsumed by an outgroup.
Anonymous No.17935333
>>17934396
>me, a hypocrite? erm akshually all of my enemies are criminals so anything I do against them is justified
Shalom! Oy Gevalt! Shalom! Oy Gevalt!