← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 17936538

10 posts 4 images /his/
Anonymous No.17936538 >>17936539 >>17936561 >>17936574 >>17937033 >>17937176
Our ancestors were more diverse than previously believed. Yet the chuds will get riled up next time the BBC airs a native Black Briton
Anonymous No.17936539
>>17936538 (OP)
>2
>out of hundreds of thousands

And THAT is why this new retelling of the Norman conquest MUST have the same demographics of the modern Yookay.
Anonymous No.17936542 >>17937061
'boonked by 'wsell
https://x.com/Tom_Rowsell/status/1956300441517445444
Anonymous No.17936561
>>17936538 (OP)
Perhaps they were only brown on the outside but white on the inside, so they moved to England
Anonymous No.17936574 >>17937171
>>17936538 (OP)
>a native Black Briton
no such thing exists
blacks have been shipped around the med sea and sold off as slaves for the better part of 5k years. a few black bones or black hybrid bones is proof of the slave trade, nothing more.
Anonymous No.17937033
>>17936538 (OP)
what is historical revisionism?
Anonymous No.17937061 >>17937167
>>17936542
>1 hour video
tl;dw

Target: England_Early_Medieval_Anglo-Saxon_Eastry_Updown_o:EAS003.SG
Distance: 1.9574% / 0.01957381 | R4P
48.0 England_Saxon
26.0 Laal_(n=1)
18.2 Berber_Mali_Tuareg_(n=3)
7.8 Tunisian_Jew_(n=10)

Target: England_Early_Medieval_Anglo-Saxon_Eastry_Updown_o:EAS003.SG
Distance: 2.0693% / 0.02069331 | R4P
51.6 England_Saxon
22.0 Berber_Mali_Tuareg_(n=3)
17.8 Mandinka_Gambia_(n=137)
8.6 Zaghawa_Sudan_(n=31)

so they were half north african
Anonymous No.17937167
>>17937061
Yeh the tldr of the genetic part of rowsell's deboonk is that she was not 4/4 saxon and /14 black because she had north african ancestry and he is obviously right.

But the video also explains the historic context of 7th century Kent and its relationship to France to show that this place was not typical of England and was the focus of a Christian mission at the time.

so the TLDR is:

-England was not diverse
-a half african child had 1/4 black ancestry and Frankish gravegoods at a time when Kent was becoming frenchified and christian
-the presence of the african person was likely related to the Gregorian mission not the "gold trade"
Anonymous No.17937171
>>17936574
This. Only explanation.
Anonymous No.17937176
>>17936538 (OP)
wow, 2 random people were treated like people
I guess that means london should be 99% paki and african