Thread 17938226

why were boomers so insanely violent?

>>17938226 (OP)
lead poisoning

>>17938226 (OP)
boomers were rebels not conformos like zoomlennials

Largest demographic naturally means that they commit most crime.

>>17938226 (OP)
post-war boom was over (four asian tigers on the rise), economy was deteriorating, quality of life declined.

One factor of many is that the lack of modern technology made it much easier to be a violent recidivist. This is one reason serial killers were so big in the 70's-80's.

>>17938226 (OP)
Way too many young people a busted economy and a very soft justice system.

crime rates are directly proportional to organized crime. So this can be seen as the gradual takeover of US cities by the black and mexican hordes which specialized in drug trafficking

>>17938701
>Way too many young people a busted economy and a very soft justice system.
It really feels like a lot of Americans don't even realize how new invention being tough on crime is. Ýoung boomers could get away with shit that would bring sentence of decades today by spending like 1-5 years in prison.

They were not. We are pussified, they were pussified too just to lesser extent

>>17938771
Crime penalties had to get higher because non anglos were imported slave labor with no loyalty to the state that immediately formed criminal syndicates

>>17938781
That happened DECADES BEFORE the tough on crime laws appeared. It wasnt that.

>>17938769
So you’re saying that organized italian mobs for example got swarmed and basically kicked out by the hordes of invaders, who then only really engaged in low level crimes unlike the mafias?

>>17938771
>It really feels like a lot of Americans don't even realize how new invention being tough on crime is.
Do I even need to explain the horrible stuff they did to you in the Middle Ages? You act like everyone used to be walking around murdering and raping and getting a slap on the wrist until 30 years ago?

>>17938771
New York used to execute like ten people every year pre-1950s. In fact a lot of states that are absolutely pansy no death penalty ones today did.

>>17938814
The vast majority of crime went unpunished in the Middle Ages since detection and confirmation were effectively impossible. Executions were rare overall.

>>17938806
Hmm? Mexicans/Jews and some italians and whatever other retards crossed into the US during that time were mass legalized in the 60's.

Since the US tried to curb the shipment of heroin into the US from mexico mexico became the western hemisphere's main exporter of heroin. With all the illegal mexicans coming into the US they create a human bridge for drug trafficking, which came into contact with inner city blacks. Also the jewish/irish/italian mafia was getting all their heroin from mexico

This resulted in the explosion of crime in the 60's

>>17938814
^This. The idea of actually incarcerating someone as a punishment in of itself wasn't even a thing yet so you could be put to death for tons of offenses even white collar ones like counterfeiting, often in horrible ways.

>>17938811
>organized italian mobs for example got swarmed and basically kicked out by the hordes of invaders
yes, although they were connected through the illicit drug trade

>>17938820
it's interesting but many of the most death penalty using states today like Texas and Oklahoma executed way fewer people back then

>>17938820
why do Amerifats use such stupid Rube Goldberg execution methods instead of a rope or bullet?

>>17938852
Doesn't Utah use firing squad?

>>17938832
say what? if i'm a peasant in my village and wake up one morning and find my neighbor in the barn raping my 12 yo daughter i'm gonna know about it.

>>17938865
He's not gonna rape her in the barn but take her out in the woods or hills.

>>17938865
oh you know how it was. back in the 19th-early 20th century especially in the South if you had an unsolved murder and no suspect you just grabbed the first black guy you thought looked suspicious and executed him after a show trial.

>>17938932
No one cares, LBJfag.

>>17938864
yes they do

>>17938850
not as populated

>>17938226 (OP)
the 70s were absolutely lolcow

>keep teenage hitchhikers in your house and rape and torture them for days
>the Chief Wiggum cops have no clue what's going on
>one of the teens escapes and goes to police who be like "Yeah, cool story bro."
>even if they do bust you, you just get some court-ordered psychotherapy and promise you're all better now and won't do it again

>>17938771
>>17938701
Say what? Trump just had to take over D.C. because crime was out of control due to their extreme softness.

>>17938814
BTW read about Pope Sixtus V's brutal crackdown on crime in the Papal States.

>>17939109
imagine being this propagandized

>>17939091
The idea of rehabilitative justice was a lot more of a thing back then.

>>17938811
No the Mafia got chopped up by RICO busts.

>>17939619
>Mafia got chopped up
they ran everything in the major cities so just a little law enforcement and people think they don't exist anymore when really they just went even further underground

>>17938307
In the entire world of just in the US?

>>17939109
you show these RADICAL LEFISTS my MIGA xister! PATRIOTS IN CONTROL WWG1WGA

>>17939692
>>17939687
incoherent Pajeet broken English posts

>>17938771
Yes, exactly. So many people have no knowledge of that. It applied to blacks too even, although in some locations less so. It wasn't unheard of to get less than 20, even 10 years for murder in particular cases.

>>17939717
Care to point out the mistakes in my post to me? Also, you could try to answer my question cuz no one did.

>>17939955
https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/qmss/2023/03/04/serial-killer-statistics/

>Radford University and Florida Gulf Coast University have a jointly operated database that keeps track of serial killers, their years of operation, their victims, and their methods of execution. Each year, the team behind the database releases an annual report on serial killer data. They somewhat playfully refer to this data as Serial Killer Statistics.

>The database tracks serial killings all the way back to 1900 and includes serial killers from over 115 countries. The U.S. leads the rest of the world in documented serial killers, with a whopping 3,613 serial killers as of 2020 (England is not-so-close second, with known 176 serial killers as of 2020). The data tracks the number of serial killers that have been active each year too, with 1986 being the peak in the U.S. Generally, murders by serial killers in the U.S. was at its highest between 1970 and 1990, which is when some of the most sensationalized killers were active (think Bundy, Dahmer, Ramirez, Gacy, and Kemper, among many more).

>>17939670
I was reading about mobsters fighting over the tow truck industry in Toronto recently. Sounded interesting. A not-insignificant percentage of homicides in the city are related to it, or so I read.

>>17939958
Latin America has far more but you don't know of them because of the language barrier.

>>17939958
The FBI's official definition of a serial killer is that the perp has killed at least four people. That can be a very elastic grouping and including many things that are not necessarily the stereotypical sexual psychopath.

>>17938226 (OP)
a better question is why all you zoomers are pathetic pacifists

>>17940036
Wait, are you comparing the US with the crime-ridden Latin American shitholes (don't really want to use this word but hey)? Even if it is as you say, the US still leads in this statistic by far.

>>17940068
Brown shitholes don't record crime like white countries. Even in the US brown left wing cities are massively under reporting crimes now

>>17939958
>The U.S. leads the rest of the world in documented serial killers, with a whopping 3,613 serial killers as of 2020 (England is not-so-close second, with known 176 serial killers as of 2020)
English records can also go back centuries.