← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 17938657

31 posts 14 images /his/
Anonymous No.17938657 >>17938666 >>17938694 >>17938720 >>17939321 >>17940618
This 6'2 Gravettian mogger got replaced by 5'6 Epigravettian WHGs, likely his women being stolen by the WHG as well seeing as both had U5 Mtdna
Anonymous No.17938666 >>17938740 >>17940764
>>17938657 (OP)
Stone age pussy got me acting unwise
Anonymous No.17938674 >>17942024
WHG underwent a population bottleneck which reduced them to a few dozens individuals in Italy during the LGM. No one was replaced, they just died to the advancing ice.
Anonymous No.17938694 >>17938718
>>17938657 (OP)
They run out of mammoths to kill and eat, and their height went down.
And they were white, those brown illustrations are basically Cartoon Network tier.
Anonymous No.17938718 >>17938730 >>17939006 >>17939617 >>17940647
>>17938694
Best case scenario was that they were the same complexion as Native Americans. You can't be white without the full genetic architecture for it. We know it works, because Ashkenazi Jews and Circassians have it too.
Anonymous No.17938720 >>17938723
>>17938657 (OP)
whgs groups very in height, the iron gates for example were very tall
Anonymous No.17938723 >>17938727 >>17938728
>>17938720
They were not WHG
Anonymous No.17938727
>>17938723
don't start splitting hairs
Anonymous No.17938728
>>17938723
80% WHG so eh
Anonymous No.17938730 >>17938733
>>17938718
White looking People (SHG) existed before white genetic profile (Corded Ware)
Anonymous No.17938733 >>17938741
>>17938730
SHG had the same genetic architecture for it as Zuckerberg. WHG lacked it.
Anonymous No.17938740
>>17938666
>women before makeup and skin routines
grim
Anonymous No.17938741 >>17938743 >>17938753
>>17938733
See I get what you are getting at. Yiu're thinking of the the SLC + HERC combo of depigmentation but the IRF4 gene makes this complicated as it was fixated in WHGs and rare in most modern europeans. We can't tell how it interacted with Herc. IRF4 today is really only a thing in like Irish people
Anonymous No.17938743 >>17938761
>>17938741
At like 14%. WHG could have looked like a really tan Baltic person for all we know
Anonymous No.17938753 >>17938808 >>17942274
>>17938741
Hard to say how much IRF4 even does. The red hair gene MC1R is a certified melanin killer though. If you look at redheads from Morocco, Xinjiang etc they always have white skin.
Anonymous No.17938761 >>17938808
>>17938743
it's more common than that in irish people, curiously it's also common in udmurts
Anonymous No.17938808 >>17942157
>>17938753
I forgot about M1CR. How common is it in European foragers? I agree, it makes even churkas ginger brits when present
>>17938761
Thank you
Anonymous No.17939006 >>17940647
>>17938718
>You can't be white without the full genetic architecture for it.
And who told you they didn't have it?

The funniest part is that the whitest European populations (the Finns and the Baltics) have the gighest levels of WHG admixture (around 20%).

If the WHG were even slightly brown, those guys would be browner than modern central Italians.

But I guess logical and critical thinking in modern times is at its lowest it's ever been...
Anonymous No.17939321 >>17939757 >>17940577
>>17938657 (OP)
>6'2 Gravettian
Could it be an outlier? I doubt any people in the Paleolithic were so high on average.
Anonymous No.17939617
>>17938718
WHGs had alleles for light skin. It's extremely unlikely that they were brown-skinned. Not even EEF shade of brown.
Anonymous No.17939757
>>17939321
They appear to have been nearly that on average.
Anonymous No.17940577
>>17939321
They've had very high sexual dimorphism, with men regularly standing a foot taller than women
Anonymous No.17940618
>>17938657 (OP)
You know wazzup.
Anonymous No.17940647 >>17940762
>>17939006
>The funniest part is that the whitest European populations (the Finns and the Baltics) have the gighest levels of WHG admixture (around 20%).
>If the WHG were even slightly brown, those guys would be browner than modern central Italians.

African Americans like Don Cheadle are 20% white on average, yet they're medium to dark brown on average. That doesn't mean shit.

>>17938718
Native Americans before European admixture ran the gamut fron East Asian pale to very dark brown.
Anonymous No.17940762
>>17940647
>African Americans like Don Cheadle are 20% white on average, yet they're medium to dark brown on average.
Yeah, and if they were 100% black, they'd be completely black.
Like, you know, people in Africa.
Secondly, whiteness is recessive, so any genes for darker complexion will be visible.
Anonymous No.17940764
>>17938666
https://youtu.be/28--5aEV1Z0
Anonymous No.17942024 >>17942320
>>17938674
>WHG underwent a population bottleneck which reduced them to a few dozens individuals in Italy during the LGM. No one was replaced, they just died to the advancing ice.
The WHGs just took the Farmer Stacy girls and cucked the males who were plowing the field in the backyard.
Same how in Spain it was confirmed that the Yamnayas replaced 40% of the genome, but at the same time it was 100% of the male lineage.
Anonymous No.17942157
>>17938808
>M1CR
nta but some variants cause people to be darker in skin and hair. The Fournol cluster (Aurignacian+Gravettian) had one of these iirc.

There have been studied on Anglos and Latinx in the southwest US, because they carried two different M1CR variants and the latter causes darker pigments. M1CR has variants in all different species, it's why some gain red hair over time and it gets selected for like mammoths and neanderthal.
Anonymous No.17942274
>>17938753
No. Those people have red hair bc of their admixture with people with proto indo european dna. People used to think they were the offspring of Russian soldiers. Turns out that dna is ancient. Like 3000 years ago ancient.
Anonymous No.17942320 >>17942328
>>17942024
True. They did the same everywhere except in the balkans and greece and Iran and India. Why? Probably bc the popualtioj was much more dense. If your taking a village of 1000 people it's easy to murder the males and breed the females. If your taking a town of 50,000 and they are organzied, much harder to do the same.
Anonymous No.17942328
>>17942320
The plague was apparently devastating in Neolithic Europe and rural herders fared better. Europe had some surprisingly large cities and not just in the Balkans but some graveyards and necropolises are essentially plague cemeteries it was so bad.