← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 17939851

24 posts 8 images /his/
Anonymous No.17939851 >>17939858 >>17939860 >>17939893 >>17940114
I've seen people say that if Spain had accepted Hitler's invitation to join the Axis, it would have just been a detriment and caused the Axis to lose faster. Why?
Anonymous No.17939858 >>17939861 >>17939985 >>17940030 >>17940115
>>17939851 (OP)
It's the other way around. Franco offered to join in return for territorial concessions and Germany turned him down. These are Hitler's thoughts on the matter
Anonymous No.17939860 >>17939869
>>17939851 (OP)
Because Spain was a horrible mess at the time due to the aftermath of the civil war. They would've been of absolutely no use. The only reason the allies didn't immediately stage a landing in Spain was because of official neutrality. Had Spain openly declared themselves part of the Axis, they would've forfeited this guarantee.
Anonymous No.17939861 >>17939985
>>17939858
Anonymous No.17939869 >>17939900 >>17939901 >>17940053 >>17940093
>>17939860
yeah but consider that Spaniards can fight while Anglos cant.
When Spaniards are defending their own land they always punch up.
on defense in general they punch up.
Id say it would have taken a good 500,000 to subdue Spain fully.
US public would have overthrown their government if they lost 500,000 in Spain alone
Anonymous No.17939881
Theres a book Hemingway wrote about, nice readm completely destrys the spanish. Starting with bringing women into the military and ending with them completely ignoring enemy movements. Not the friends you wanna have
Anonymous No.17939893
>>17939851 (OP)
because not only was their industry fucked by the civil war, not only where huge portions of the country still on edge being ruled by the nationalist and would have token any opportunity to revolt again, but the country was also heavily reliant on outside trade despite Francos efforts, in other words them joining the axis would mean said vital trade would be cut off so the axis woudl not only have to garrision the place but also need to supply it far more resources
Anonymous No.17939900 >>17939946
>>17939869
>dude logistics and production isn't real just rely on your warrior spirit or whatever
This is exactly why those retards lost.
Anonymous No.17939901 >>17939946
>>17939869
Are you aware that you are talking about Spain and even a post civil war Spain with people not having enough food?

Also many people would have joined the allies aginst Franco too, republicans, leftists, etc. I don't see people wanting to fight after a brutal civil war.

I think you are comparing that to when the french invasion but there is no comparison in my opinion.
Anonymous No.17939946 >>17939956 >>17939976 >>17940095
>>17939900
>>dude logistics and production isn't real just rely on your warrior spirit or whatever
worked for
>China
>Afghanistan
>Vietnam
>Turkey
>Serbia
>US colonies
>israel
>Yugoslavia
logistics and production are memes, they are catnip for midwits who are charmed by the thought of athletic chads losing to nerds with spreadsheets, but in reality this never happens.
>>17939901
Not having enough food as in population decline or not having enough food as in breadlines?
one can sustain a war, the other can not.
>many would have joined the allies
speculation
>comparing with the French invasion
No, I am comparing it to Spanish history in general.
Anonymous No.17939956 >>17940023
>>17939946
>>China
When?
>>Afghanistan
They fought asymmetrical warfare and their enemies were retards with no clear goals beyond keeping the MIC's bank account out of the negative.
>>Vietnam
Irrelevant. The US did not dedicate actual resources towards this half-assed "police action" out of fear that the Chinese would fling nukes at the border.
>>Turkey
They lost though.
>>Serbia
I haven't read up on their history much so maybe you're right. Can't argue here.
>>US colonies
Received funding from Spain and support from France. This is like those tankies who cope about Lend Lease being irrelevant.
>>israel
They're almost certainly more advanced than their retarded neighbors.
>>Yugoslavia
As with Serbia, I don't know enough to comment.
Anonymous No.17939976 >>17940023
>>17939946
>many would have joined the allies
>speculation

Bro read something please. The leftists were begging for the allies to invade Spain to kick Franco out of power.
Anonymous No.17939985
>>17939858
>>17939861
Interesting, where's this from?
Anonymous No.17940023 >>17940095
>>17939976
Like what?
>>17939956
>when
WWII.
Yes, Afghanistan is a good example of warrior spirit and will to engage overcoming the logistics meme.
>irrelevant
no, its not irrelevant that a lack of will lead to a US defeat.
Will to engage which you mockingly called warrior spirit IS necessary to win.
Otherwise the US will lose to an otherwise pushover force like goatherders or jungle villagers.
>they lost
no, Turkey won their independence war because of their will to fight. They were completely outclassed by their enemies but their enemies did not have the same will as the Turks, the Turks won the clash of wills which won the war in a way that logistics and production could not.
>US received funding
and despite all of this the US was outmatched entirely and their battle record shows it, having lost nearly as many battles as they fought, having been defeated time and again, they 'lost' their way to victory because of sheer will and determination. They outlasted the British will to fight and despite Britain being significantly stronger than the colonies, the colonials won.
>israel
israel was behind their neighbors in the 1930s and 1940s, they wont through superior organization and extreme levels of determination.
Their entire founding is like a second coming of Mohammed, it is religious-political fervor overwhelming the British, the Arabs, the Egyptians who had the israels completely outmatched in production, deployed assets, and supplies.
readiness and a will to fight is the primary determiner of victory.
Anonymous No.17940030
>>17939858
LMAO what a faggot. Every single Spanish Republican should have been strangled.
Anonymous No.17940053 >>17940089
>>17939869
Yeah I'm sure Franco would've had hundreds of thousands of defeated Republicans fighting for him side-by-side with the Moroccans he'd just unleashed on their wives and daughters only a few years earlier
Anonymous No.17940089
>>17940053
>republicans
I didnt know Spain was 100% republican
Anonymous No.17940093 >>17941079
>>17939869
That’s retarded
Anonymous No.17940095 >>17941079
>>17939946
>>17940023
This is literal retard thinking
Anonymous No.17940114 >>17940182
>>17939851 (OP)

Spain was a shithole where 1 in 3 people couldn't fucking read BEFORE the Civil War. Afterward it was not only in a state of social and industrial ruin, but the Republicans hadn't even been fully pacified. The Spanish Maquis continued to fight a guerrilla war against Franco's government well into the 1960s.

The most Spain could have offered was providing a means to seize Gibraltar and effectively close off the Western Mediterranean to British naval traffic. But that wouldn't have necessarily have doomed the British as they still controlled the sea lanes around the Horn of Africa.
Anonymous No.17940115
>>17939858
Damn I didnt realize he was such a faggot.
Anonymous No.17940182
>>17940114
>Spain was a shithole where 1 in 3 people couldn't fucking read BEFORE the Civil War
literacy is a freemasonic trap o algo
Anonymous No.17941079
>>17940095
>>17940093
Yet there is no evidence this type of thinking as it has been proven correct multiple times in both recent and less contemporary history.
Anonymous No.17942678
Because they just got out of a civil war, and were extremely weak. Hitler already had one weak ally, another would be detrimental.