← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 17940353

13 posts 6 images /his/
Anonymous No.17940353 >>17940513 >>17940522 >>17940539 >>17940543 >>17940554 >>17940563 >>17940567
Reminder to the Unionchuds on here who think the Union were based white supremacists.
>The Union Army was fighting for black civil rights, black citizenship, and black integration
>The Union government repeatedly undermined attempts by Southern Unionists to adopt a plan of colonization for freed slaves in Haiti, Liberia, or anywhere else
>Unionists intentionally undermined, and ignored the suggestions of, the Southern Loyalists' Convention in Philadelphia which sought colonization of most freedmen & only allowing those that served in the Union military & their families to remain in the U.S and have voting rights.
>Every single piece of civil rights legislation in the U.S has been based on the reconstruction amendments passed by the Unionist congress
>The legacy of the Union war effort is modern multi-racial America

This isn't directed at those who think this is a good thing, but there's a surprising amount of conservative/far-right people I've seen on here who try to pretend that the Unionist war effort was something that it wasn't.
Anonymous No.17940513
>>17940353 (OP)
>Unionists intentionally undermined, and ignored the suggestions of, the Southern Loyalists' Convention in Philadelphia which sought colonization of most freedmen & only allowing those that served in the Union military & their families to remain in the U.S and have voting rights
would have been based. If only the republitroons didn't impeach Johnson.
Anonymous No.17940522 >>17940704
>>17940353 (OP)
the past is prologue
Anonymous No.17940539
>>17940353 (OP)
...
Anonymous No.17940543
>>17940353 (OP)
Your first mistake was thinking those posters cared about being historically accurate.
Anonymous No.17940554 >>17940805
>>17940353 (OP)
black males had the right to vote before White chicks btw
Big Bongus !!9zfcclmmPlH No.17940563 >>17940681
>>17940353 (OP)
Those aren't chuds, they're just using chud words because they give you clout on 4chan
Anonymous No.17940567
>>17940353 (OP)
Abraham Lincoln once asked General Winfield Scott this question: "Why is it that you were once able to take Mexico City in three months with five thousand men, and we have been unable to take Richmond with one hundred thousand men?"

"I will tell you," said General Scott. "The men who took us into Mexico City are the same men who are keeping us out of Richmond."
Anonymous No.17940681
>>17940563
Nah. They are very much chuds. Retarded ones, yes, but still chuds. Mostly its due to some Nick Fuentes sphere streamer/twitter user who tries really had to pretend that the Union Army were le hekkin basederinoo white supremacist fascists like him.

They're all mind numbingly retarded but they somehow infected this board.
Anonymous No.17940704
>>17940522
2 more weeks
Anonymous No.17940805
>>17940554
>black males had the right to vote before White chicks btw
There’s a quote from one of those feminist founding mothers something like “women descended from the Mayflower can’t vote but Paddy and Hans and Sambo and Chang can”—hate to misquote but she used 4chan style lingo names to describe lower class men.
Anonymous No.17940807 >>17940811
The union's only mistake was rebuilding the south instead of razing and resettling.
Anonymous No.17940811
>>17940807
So the US would be even more cultureless in your ideal world? Gross.