← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 17946215

16 posts 2 images /his/
Anonymous No.17946215 >>17946237 >>17946245 >>17946305
Historically speaking, why are anglos so puritanical? Why are they so decisively against pornography to the point "obscenity" is an exception to free speech? What is so taboo about sex in the anglosphere?

Like what events or cultural movements explain this kind of extremism and how is it universal in the english speaking world.
Anonymous No.17946237 >>17946287 >>17946294
>>17946215 (OP)
They are gynocentric and matriarchal because they retained celtic culture the best being insular.
French people are too romanized.
So women's whims become "morality", tons of competition between males that just end up "flattening" theirselves into a female acceptable mold.
Anonymous No.17946245 >>17946287
>>17946215 (OP)
Sex involves intimate contact, a transfer of bodily fluids, which leads to a high potential for disease spread, and it has an obvious relation to reproduction, which leads to us being innately disposed to having certain views regarding sex. You should expect races which are more concerned with the quality rather than the quantity of their offspring to have more restrictive attitudes regarding sex, as this assists them in ensuring they mate with the right partner. This is one reason why higher races such as the English are more sexually restrictive than lower races such as sub-Saharan Africans.

There is good reason to believe that the desire to police certain sexual behaviours is innate, but what that desire is directed towards seems to be determined, in significant part, by culture. Nowadays, our morality is determined by feminists and Jews, and as a consequence, reproductive sexual behaviours, such as sex with young fertile women, are highly stigmatized.
Anonymous No.17946287
>>17946237
Chuddo-Marxist response

>>17946245
Stormschizo response
Anonymous No.17946294
>>17946237
The puritans were genetically Anglo, I've noticed the religious and political extremists are germanic in origin
Anonymous No.17946305 >>17946338 >>17946467 >>17946863
>>17946215 (OP)
>Historically speaking, why are anglos so puritanical?
The UK and the US are the top distributors of pornography in the world. It's one of the reasons why abrahamic religion is incompatible with whites.
https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/10-countries-that-produce-maximum-pornography-is-india-on-this-list-142504991-142504279.html
>bubububu jew-
Jews are a white nation and have been an integral part of the anglosphere for a long time. They are white.
This is why I will support wahhabists even if I am Christian. This is gonna have to stop.
Anonymous No.17946338 >>17946349
>>17946305
>is india on this list?
Why do I care lol.

>Muh abrahamic religions
>Muh anglo white genetics.

Please. What happened to this board? I'm sure the shitposting isn't supposed to be this low effort.
Anonymous No.17946349 >>17946353
>>17946338
You asked a loaded question on a false pretense. How am I shitposting when I merely showed you the truth about your country's porn problem?
Anonymous No.17946353 >>17946366
>>17946349
My country?
Porn problem? Porn is good, the problem is censorship. I thought I made this clear in the OP.
Anonymous No.17946361
Well according to the weak version of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, the language you think and speak in influences thought. English is a quite conservative language it seems, the assumptions it has about reality are very different than say French.

I also heard from a friend (who is British and a communist, so take it as you will) that the weather has a big influence on politics. He claimed that the revolutions of 1848 didn't take place in England because when the organizers were supposed to meet on the big day it was pouring rain. He noted how protests in Britain tend to fizzle out in the winter months and pick up in the summer.
Anonymous No.17946366
>>17946353
It's a problem to me. That's the only opinion that matters.
And yes. Your country.
Censorship itself isn't a bad thing. In this case it's kind of good, but it's not addressing the key root of the issue.
Anonymous No.17946467 >>17946472
>>17946305
What's this dancing boy babbling about
Anonymous No.17946472 >>17946802
>>17946467
he's right though. anglos aren't puritan. they literally made porn a commodity.
Anonymous No.17946802
>>17946472
>they literally made porn a commodity.
That would be talmudists.
Anonymous No.17946863
>>17946305
>Jews are a white nation and have been an integral part of the anglosphere for a long time. They are white.
They're about as white as the Roma bud.
Anonymous No.17946956
Traditional Puritan values are the main culprit.
This question is explored a lot in court cases dealing with obscenity like Roth v. United States. I'd check some of those out, they're pretty interesting.