← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 17953573

12 posts 6 images /his/
Anonymous No.17953573 >>17953592 >>17953628 >>17954909
Do we even need historians anymore?
Anonymous No.17953592 >>17953600 >>17953685
>>17953573 (OP)
How will you prove that AI decrypted them correctly and without errors?
Anonymous No.17953600 >>17953605 >>17953685
>>17953592
How do we know that historians aren't making shit up in the first place instead of decyphering?
Anonymous No.17953605
>>17953600
I don't know, but I have a friend who doesn't know either.
Anonymous No.17953628
>>17953573 (OP)
> machine designed to match patterns matches patterns better than its designers
yes, that's the point
yes, we need historians for the rest of the work
Anonymous No.17953635 >>17953643
>Human historians and deepmind can now be confidently wrong together!
Anonymous No.17953638
>historian is when you decipher old stuff
Anonymous No.17953643
>>17953635
What makes you think historians are wrong
Anonymous No.17953660
>Absolutely! I can translate this ancient tablet into modern English for you. It reads, "Ur a faget."
Anonymous No.17953685 >>17953690
>>17953600
>>17953592
We do 100% know for certain that LLMs are literally built to just make up shit, if that's the question.
Question is just if they're making up shit within a range of tolerance narrow enough for the result to be useful.

The real miracle is that we have come up with useful machines that are explicitly built on understanding that they have no fucking idea what is even.
Anonymous No.17953690
>>17953685
A child that lies, was it built to lie or is it a thing that was built that is also capable of lies?
Anonymous No.17954909
>>17953573 (OP)
Good morning saar!