Thread 17967459

What caused the French to suddenly become so based in the 18th century?

>it will never work
And it didn't. How did he know brehs

>>17967459 (OP)
>kills their young male population resulting in demographic stagnation
>First Euro cunt to mass import shitskins
>First Euro cunt to promote race mixing in Europe
>First Euro cunt to promote feminism
>First Euro cunt to have mass socialist movements
>First Euro cunt to have zionist movements
>based
Grim

>>17967485
>And it didn-ACK

>>17967506
-ACK for republicans indeed

>>17967485
They got basically everything they wanted
>god is dead
>monarchs all gone or reduced to national circus freak mascots
>republic is the official form of government on 90% of the planet
>racial and gender equality widespread
>almost all of Europe adopted their legal system

>>17967535
>racial and gender equality widespread
The Republic beheaded Suffragettes.

>>17967459 (OP)
Republicanism isn’t based.

>>17967485
>>17967752
If republicanism and liberal democracy aren't based and don't work then how come they're gonna be the dominant, and perhaps even only, form of government for the rest of human history?

Because they got a taste of democracy during the American Revolution, and they wanted more.

>>17967506
>>17967459 (OP)

>>17967777
Francis Fukuyama please fuck off

>>17967485
Only once you are on the cusp of having Power wrested from your hand do you suddenly have a profound vision about the futility of struggle and domination.

And then the profound shit you say becomes a quotation that marks the epitaph of your chapter in the History books.

>>17967459 (OP)
Only based thanks to Napoleon. The Revolution was only good because it created the circumstances for Napoleon to rise to the top.

>>17967459 (OP)
I think the primary motivator was extreme inequality. Taxes were high and food was expensive. Meanwhile I assume the ruling class was cruising by. When the children are already starving, the parents have mothing to lose.
American revolution and stronger communication (printing) facilitated this.

>>17967488
Demographic decline started few decades before the Revolution. But it took time before its effect became noticeable.

>>17967777
Countries don’t have to be a republic in order to be a liberal democracies (see Japan and the UK for example).

>>17967535
>>god is dead
Not yet, he trooned out but is not yet dead.

>>17967459 (OP)
beyond the socioeconomic factors I think it's important to note that the technology and capabilities between rulers and the ruled had never been closer. I fear the whole revolutionary period with large organized uprisings was just a one off event in human history.

>>17967777
>French revolution starts 236 years ago.
>Open social hierarchies like monarchy, aristocracy, and oligarchy have been around since prehistory.
>Free countries today are controlled by media plutocrats because power is about swaying public opinion.
Hierarchy will always exist; it is an immutable law of nature that some are better than others. The issue we have today is the wrong people hold the power. No well adjusted person is going to complain if a benevolent king takes control because normal people don't care about the method of government; their sole concern is whether it helps them or not.

>>17967459 (OP)
>based
Satanic

>>17967777
>they're gonna be the dominant, and perhaps even only, form of government for the rest of human history?
China, Russia, NorK, Kazhastan, Turkmekistan, Uzbekistan, Tadjikistan, Turkey and all the arab states would like to have a word with you! Probably Indonesia Malaysia Myanmar Maybe Singapore also Afroniggers too but they don't matter.

>>17968939
>Napoleon
A manlet cuck. Literally! Genocidal maniac too.

>>17969689
Aren't literally all of those officially describing themselves as republics?

>>17969481
I’m sure losing a large % of the male population had no effect on it then

>>17969696 Nice digits.
I can call Rupert a horse all day but he's still a mouse. A title means nothing without practice; Those places are republics in name only.

>>17967535
And it created an unsustainable society that will collapse in on itself in the next century or so and revert to some form of monarchy

>>17969926
I think the United States is quite benefitting from this situation, now that even China and India are about to join the slump.
Why? Because in a world of universal declining demographics the nation capable of growing through immigration without great internal damage to itself is king.

>>17969926
Surely, it will collapse. Just like China will collapse in just a few weeks, lmao at third world cope.

>>17969956
You will run out of immigrants sooner or later, it's just a race to the bottom

>>17969962
They'll say you're brown but they'll never say that you're wrong

>>17969962
the population of the west already collapsed mate, the huge reductions are only filled with immigrants. For example the population of Germany was already reduced from 80 to 60 million in the last decades, with just enough immigrants coming in to replace the losses. It's not sustainable

>>17967485
>it will never work
It actually worked?
What went so right bros?

Sometimes I think if it wasn't for the french revolution we would still be in some kind of royalty based government system

>>17967459 (OP)
The French Revolution was a mistake.

>>17967459 (OP)
Getting repeatedly btfo by Britain caused a lot of introspection about their absolute monarchy.