Thread 17968906

Historically and Humanitarily speaking, why are there so many anti-semantics on this board? Too many posters abuse words that they don't understand the meaning or context of. I say /his/ should reject anti-semanticism and work towards a more pro-semantic future.

The less words mean, the more mystics can use them to bend the truth of the physical reality around them. So did the premodernists, so will the postmodernists.

>>17968909
This is why semites aren't semantics as they do not have a set canon and constantly debate their foundational texts, which has allowed them to amass more power than anyone

>>17968920
The art of pilpul is a jewish tradition.

>>17968929
Jews just had the sense to realize that their holy text is based on oral tradition and was subject to fallibility and is a set of stories mixed together with bits of Jewish legalisms and an impressionist retelling of theological narrative which is why the Talmud exists to open dialogue regarding this reality. Christians don't like open dialogue about their own text, not even the Jewish half, so they invent a million different doctrines and canons instead to skirt around inerrancy. I've noticed a lot of Biblical scholars lately though have been rejecting this method of biblical reading thankfully

>>17968906 (OP)
Palestinians are a semitic people, moreso than the Jews that were imported to israel, does that make Israelis antisemitic?

>>17971331
Does it make Jews antisemantic though?

All the posters on /his/ are a group of Jews from Amsterdam. Even you.