Thread 17969606

If India was really as advanced as sources claim 5,000 years ago, how did civilizations like the Greeks, Persians, Chinese, Muslims, and British manage to subjugate it?

Saars are natural born liars

when the Vedic samples are finally released in a study, practically 2/3 of the "Indian history" based on an imbecile nationalism will fall to the ground, never in all history will we see a moment of weeping and gnashing of teeth and massive demoralization, all these accounts and profiles with the name of "arya____(insert any pooper name here) will have to give up their supposed pride. what may actually happen is a desperate attempt to elevate the IVC to the detriment of the Vedic as a last resort, but it will be difficult, since it will no longer be possible to use RV, Sanskrit or horses for this.

>>17969606 (OP)
>was

Indus valley civilization was founded by westerners, vedic aryans came from central asia, the very name "India" is based on this river far to the north that was frequently descended upon by foreign conquerors. "Indian" civilization was not Bharatian, for lack of better words. It was built by neolithic farmers from the fertile crescent, it was built by Vedic Aryans, it was built by Persians, Arabs and Mongols, the country of India is an invention of the British who benevolently and perhaps naively granted them independence in 1947. Indian history is a history of this or that conqueror imposing their religion, technology and systems on the servile population.

The Taj Mahal exemplifies this, built by a descendant of Timur for his Persian wife, it now sits amidst open sewage and refuse, which apparently the India cannot clear up in the modern era despite this being the iconic landmark of their nation like the Eiffel Tower and Statue of Liberty.

>>17969791
IVC was Aryan
Bharat is an Aryan word
Taj Mahal was a Hindu temple, Muslims rewrote history

>>17969791
No, indus Valley favela was made by people semiliar to Zagros_N

>>17969606 (OP)
Indian civilization was founded by whites.

Blacks are the true Indians.

They started off strong, but eventually they lagged behind. Sorry, Pajeet.

Some diverse schizos here

>>17969606 (OP)
>india
>advanced
anon...........

>>17969606 (OP)
This makes it more humiliating, the British were the Underdogs who Fraud checked India.

You know what it's quite the experience seeing temples like this and taj majal surrounded by mountains of shit on Google maps.
India is one of the most unique nations for the wrong reasons.

>>17969606 (OP)
there was no Arjuna in 5500 BC. Arjuna is a euro-iranian invention who came from the eurasian steppes.

By 2000 BC, England was already populated by the superior IE people, the Kelts.

>>17969606 (OP)
>If India was really as advanced as sources claim 5,000 years ago, how did civilizations like the Greeks, Persians, Chinese, Muslims, and British manage to subjugate it?

>Greeks
>Persians
they didn't
>Muslims
Its a religion... a bunch of Indians converted to Islam. Despite what Indian nationalists say it wasn't a bunch of Arabs invading India or whatever.
>British
Picking away at it and being really good at playing various factions against each other. They tried various shit several times until they finally got lucky and managed to establish themselves while there was no significant power to oppose them. And it's not like they came out and announced "we are a foreign power here to fuck you up" - the EIC was smart enough to present itself as just another bunch of aristocrats and adopt Indian customs and appearances at first.