>>17970813
>no ability to earn their freedom
Wrong, they could purchase their freedom and many were freed upon the death of their master if they had served dutifully and espoused a desire to strike out on their own.
Lefties think slaves were yearning to be free.
These werent african Americans, these were yoruba purploids with an IQ in the low 70s, they didnt have a concept of up or down let alone freedom.
>families broken up
This is such a retarded myth.
From the data we have families were basically never broken up and the only selling off that took place was of young men, whom in ALLLLLLL societies everywhere go out from their place of origin. If anything the argument should be in reverse and state that it was unnatural to not break up families by selling off young males who traditionally would have gone off to another tribe to marry.
>brutally hard
They worked less hours than wagies today and their labor was easy enough that their life expectancy was greater than it is today.
>no practical limits on abuse
No, there were practical limits on abuse, slaves could not be wantonly beaten nor could they be murdered nor could they be abandoned because of age or illness. Slaves are never abused, they werent even beaten, there is only 1 photo of a severely whipped slave, one, out of millions of slaves.
There is no practical limit on the abuse of a dog or a child today, are dogs and children brutally oppressed by their owners?
>cant do shit besides work and rest
This was literally everyone before high technology.
>cant learn to read
patently false, data from abolitionists collected in 1870 showed slave literacy was higher than that of Eastern Europeans.
>muh blood and soil
You dont even believe those are important.
Historical slavery had ALL of those and worse.