Thread 17971199

Why have white people been the protagonists of history while browns just kind of watched from the sidelines?

>>17971199 (OP)
>White
>More than half of these figures are either Italians or Ashkenazi Jews born in central europe between france and germany
Umm... Whitebros?

Why do Nords and Anglos pretend they invented pale skin? Where do you people think you got everything from?

>>17971199 (OP)
>WHITE POWERRRRRRRR

Just think about it. When browns fought browns they fought over ideas invented by whites or to be our Yes Men.

Define "accomplishments in the scientific inventories"

>Italians and Greeks are white now
In before insane cope about how they used to white but aren't now for some reason.

>>17971250
They were always white.

I'm european but you're mentally ill if you think the gap with asia is that big

>>17971282
And even the Arab world as a matter of fact

>>17971282
Well it is that big though.
Asia did invent some stuff but nothing compared to Europe.

>>17971250
That graph has nothing to do with Ancient Greece or Italy, but with more modern periods

>>17971213
Were Jews good at real science, or just, banking, and invent different societal and political ideologies, which were the pronouns of those periods

>>17971282
Copying and mass production is different thing

>>17971284
If the Nile Valley and the Fertile Crescent of ancient times are considered the arab world than this is doubly retarded.

>>17971489
>modern periods just sprung up out of nowhere

>>17971271
>insane cope

>>17971199 (OP)
That's the most retarded book in human history, it's the we wuz kangz for white people.

Anyone with even a basic knowledge of history knows that the statement "97% of human accomplishments come from western Europe is retarded." This man used a 20th century British encyclopedia to collect data on "human accomplishments", I could get the same result that biases Chinese or Islamic inventions by using texts from their sources.

The significant figures is arguably even more retarded. The ancient western world alone has more "significant figures" than the Arab/East asian world combined, if you add in modern Europe and North America you get 50x the amount of significant figures, you have to be borderline inbred to believe that.

>>17971199 (OP)
The hell is the "Antipodes" supposed to represent?

>>17971532
They aren't considered part of europe that's for certain.

>>17971282
The gap in Nobel prizes is about the same so it's believable

>>17971199 (OP)
Whites are racially superior.

>>17971631
His book uses world history textbooks produced in other languages to reduce bias but you're a monkeybrained retard that never actually investigated the controversy, you just read a reddit opinion that agreed with your biases and adopted it

>>17971695
He's right you can't debunk him. Euroids were only relevant in the 15th century and their technological relevance only begun in the 10th

>>17971704
The vast majority of all significant technological developments happened in the past few hundred years

most of the "scientific achievements" happened post Industrial Revolution which Asia completely missed. There is nothing more to it.

>>17971282
How about you think for a second instead of going off of vibes? The entire modern world -- calculus, statistics, advanced math, industrial revolution, computers, relativity, quantum physics, planes, jets, nukes, rockets, your fucking toothpaste -- was created by Europeans and Jews.

Im as white as it gets but there's more to historical accomplishment than just scientific innovations.

>>17971863
Sure, go look at conquest or music or art or architecture lmao

>>17971631
Why do people who hate this book the most are always the ones who never read it?

>This man used a 20th century British encyclopedia to collect data on "human accomplishments",
All his sources are from late 21st century and none are exclusive to Britain or the West. The authors may have been white or whatever but that doesn't mean they focused solely on Western accomplishments and ignored everyone else. These are 1990s western academics we are talking about. These are some of the most libtarded people to ever exist. The kind who believe doing homework with your kids is white supremacy. If there were any notable brown people they definitely included them. You can rest assured of that.

>>17972069
*meant late 20th

>>17971631
btw when it came to art and literature Murray went out of his way included sources unique to various parts of non-Western world.

>>17972093
and the resulting chart looks the same as for sciences

>>17971631
>>The significant figures is arguably even more retarded. The ancient western world alone has more "significant figures" than the Arab/East asian world combined if you add in modern Europe and North America you get 50x the amount of significant figures, you have to be borderline inbred to believe that.
oh you are probably some thirdie with inflated ego who believes in crap like "Islamic Golden Age" and after getting dose of reality you started sperging around.
We should just range ban every country where it's not safe to drink tap water. The quality of an average post would grow immensely

>>17971532
How many scientific advancements do you think happened in Egypt nigga?

>>17971199 (OP)
Do /pol/tards really spend their days looking at false grapgs and then jerking each other off for their skin pigmentation?
This is sad

>>17971199 (OP)
What is his treshhold for accomplishment? You can really inflate the score just by counting every micro-accomplishment on earth.

ITT: seething browns

>>17971199 (OP)
Murray is a literal zionist that believes jews are god's chosen people

>>17972372
Based. Most of human achivements are Jewish anyway.

>>17972372
>In the April 2007 issue of Commentary magazine, Murray wrote on the disproportionate representation of Jews in the ranks of outstanding achievers and says that one of the reasons is that they "have been found to have an unusually high mean intelligence as measured by IQ tests since the first Jewish samples were tested". His article concludes with an assertion: "At this point, I take sanctuary in my remaining hypothesis, uniquely parsimonious and happily irrefutable. The Jews are God's chosen people."

>>17972375
Most are European by far in total volume, but Jews are #1 in per capita (with Europeans #2, and then everyone else is far behind).

>>17971248
The number of time people are mentioned in selected Encyclopedias.

States like Songhai were incredible but rarely got attention because they weren't written about in Eurocentric narratives.

>>17972425
Fair enough. Also, europeans also are not the same. I feel like Spain slacking off per capita, while Netherland punching above its weight for example.

>>17971199 (OP)
>ancient western world
Whites are so insecure about their unimpressive ancient history that they engage in historical appropriation.

>>17972504
Incredible in what way?
What contributions did they make to humanity?

>>17972114
Agriculture

>>17972780
BBC

>>17971282
Asians don't invent, they copy and sell shit for cheap (not even including china)

>>17971199 (OP)
Forget race, what about sex? Why do men do everything?

>>17971247
VOLUMES

>>17971547
>meet an italian person
>he is 99% the same skin colour as me
>but he isn't white t anon on incel forum
okay

>>17971631
>we wuz kangz for white people
let me repeat that to process it again
>we wuz kangz for white people
i will read your next message as soon as africans, not south-africans mind you, make any scientific progress

>>17974096
japanese women are /lit/

>>17972097
I bet Charles Murray failed statistics.
You don't present a log chart on a linear axis.

>>17974391
It's on a linear scale on purpose. Why the fuck should the Y axis be on a log scale. Are you retarded? Took your first week of high school stats?

>>17972097
That's clearly log information on a linear scale.
In such situations linear charts are misleading.
That's due to the exponential nature of scientific progress. You can invent 50 types of paper and Murray would classify that as 50 achievements. In reality all 50 are less important than the first invention of paper.

>>17974401
>It's on a linear scale on purpose
Then Murray is a drooling retard.
If 99% of inventions just happened 50 years ago, it's a log chart not a linear chart. The last 50 years are not more important than the last 2000 years that they're built on.

>>17974401
Scientific progress is exponential. Even AI is improving at an exponential rate. We have 120 years of proof that science is exponential. And then Murray says it's linear and you believe him?

>>17972130
>Soviet larper is advocating for brown excellence
You are welcome to bring in more browns to Polan.

>>17974427
Stalin was stronger than Hitler

>>17974404
There is no rule or even convention that exists if data follows an exponential curve, then use a log scale. The purpose was clearly to easily visualize gaps in achievement, a log scale does NOT do that well specially to the more layman reader which is closer to the target audience.

>>17971631

This

It doesn't take a genius to realize that the process used to come to this conclusion was deeply flawed. That being said, 95% of this board is full of drooling retards with a puddle of piss beneath their feet at any given time. That's why this book gets harped all the time.

>>17974465
>or even convention
There is a convention to do it for exactly the reason you just mentioned.
It's not impressive and there is no gap if you look at it with a log chart.

>>17974404
>In such situations linear charts are misleading.
what is misleading about the linear chart?

>>17974465
>There is a convention to do it for exactly the reason you just mentioned.
No, there isn't. It depends on the situation.
>It's not impressive and there is no gap if you look at it with a log chart.
Do you even know what a log scale is? This is what that would look like

>>17974518
Meant for>>17974501

>>17974501
>There is a convention to do it for exactly the reason
I doubt it.
Have you ever seen world population expressed on log chart? If you google it you only see charts like this

>>17974432
Stalin was as tall as Ben Shapiro

>>17974526
This chart is worthless precisely because it's not log and it's only used by overpopulation alarmists with an agenda to show how insane the population growth is and how it's unnatural.

>>17974518
No I already posted a real one here of the sp500 in linear and log >>17974404

>>17974504
Recency bias.
All recent achievements are more important than any before because the chart goes up so much right now

>>17974096
Women live longer lives because they don’t have testosterone to ruin their bodies. Look it up. Castrated males in any mammal live longer than non castrated males.

>>17974585
>No
lol

white people dont invent, they inherit.
They are mere subjects

secondly, Europe is simply a host to fucntion at behest of the grail because Europes development was guided by a foreign occupation hence the curious transition from mudhuts to providence

because Niggers are the Godfathers of European identity; a feigned sense of pride reflecting a majesty which the white "man" is simply allowed to be a purveyor of

lest it remain as beast as per its natural assigned lot, now they reflect the image of their masters

>>17971213
Do the needful, saar.

>>17974593
no offense anon but nothing that you said so far makes any sense

December 7th, 1941
A day which will live in irrelevancy where non-whites watched from the sidelines