← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 17971468

29 posts 8 images /his/
Anonymous No.17971468 >>17971471 >>17971515 >>17971531 >>17971542 >>17972912 >>17973061 >>17973080 >>17973284 >>17973806
Why are women allowed to choose their own partner?
They are retarded and their pussy is too valuable to let their hormoness decide how they waste it.
Anonymous No.17971470 >>17971774
How much do you weigh and did the effort of typing out this post cause you to audibly wheeze?
Anonymous No.17971471 >>17971482 >>17971869
>>17971468 (OP)
For the vast majority of history, they did not have a choice.

They have had a choice for maybe 150 years.
Anonymous No.17971482 >>17971511
>>17971471
Source?
Anonymous No.17971511 >>17971527
>>17971482
The practice of arranging marriages has historically been prominent in many cultures and religious traditions. It remains widespread in certain regions, particularly South Asia, West Asia and North Africa, Central Asia, Southeast Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. In other parts of the world, such as Europe and East Asia, the practice has declined substantially since the 19th century.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arranged_marriage
Anonymous No.17971515
>>17971468 (OP)
If you can't get a single woman to want to bang you, that's not on their entire gender. That's on you for being gross looking.
Anonymous No.17971516 >>17971774
If you can't compete in a free market maybe you're just a worthless human being :)
Anonymous No.17971527
>>17971511

Practice of arranged marriages has been the norm through out history among royalty and lay people. Marrying out of love is a very recent phenomenon. To be honest latter implies you have no impulse control and letting your dick do the talking. Reason why humanity peaked around 1800s
Anonymous No.17971531
>>17971468 (OP)
If you consider vaginas or getting to fuck one 'too valuable', then you arent gonna make it and foids own you. Do you even know how many more women than men exist??
Anonymous No.17971542 >>17971559 >>17971776 >>17971784
>>17971468 (OP)
because removing any mate competition results in dysgenics.
Anonymous No.17971559 >>17971586
>>17971542
So does makeup and plastic surgery, are you in favor of banning those?
Anonymous No.17971586
>>17971559
nope.
I guess I draw the line at something that results in continuous multigenerational cousin marriage though.
Anonymous No.17971774 >>17972878
>>17971516
>>17971470
This affects everyone. You’re obviously leftists, maybe trannies, but it’s a problem that has an effect on everyone in society.
Please stop making everything into a chud vs tranny battle.
>erm I didn’t say those words
Your posts are culture war coded.
Anonymous No.17971776
>>17971542
No it doesn’t. Nature selects males, males select females. This is a healthy flow. Females and males selecting each other results in dysgenics as we can see.
Women do not select for high iq ubermensch warriors. They broadly select against males generally and select for weaker dumber men that benefit them socially.
This is the height of dysgenics.
Anonymous No.17971784
>>17971542
female sexual selection is disgenic, they don’t select for smarter or more effective males they select for whoever successfully fucks them, leading selection to being a matter of who can rape the most

in a totally unrelated note black americans are set to overtake whites as majority by 2075
Anonymous No.17971869 >>17973279
>>17971471
Actually about 50 years but only a small number of women globally. The west and thats it
Anonymous No.17972817
Because men are even more retarded.
Anonymous No.17972878 >>17973105
>>17971774
>not being for arranged marriage makes you a leftist
Go to hell retard.
Anonymous No.17972885
Anonymous No.17972912
>>17971468 (OP)
The prosperity of fools shall destroy them.
Anonymous No.17973061
>>17971468 (OP)
Anon just talk to her it's really easy
Anonymous No.17973080 >>17973107
>>17971468 (OP)
women are nature's gatekeepers

but these days they can't even do that right
Anonymous No.17973105 >>17973437
>>17972878
>espousing liberal views doesnt make one a liberal I am le based
you are cringe
Anonymous No.17973107
>>17973080
theyre really not.
Anonymous No.17973279
>>17971869
Probably closer to this. Women counted on men to wed and house them while building the country and it's infrastructure. Women to a certain extent could MAYBE make it on their own before, but I doubt it. The amount of "successful" women homeowners now is actually frightening and abnormal and is going to be destructive I quite frankly believe.
Anonymous No.17973284
>>17971468 (OP)
Literally no Muslim (and basically no Hindu or Christian African) woman is allowed such a choice. It’s a Western/Asian thing
Anonymous No.17973437
>>17973105
Only if your definition is liberal is rooted in the 1700s. Most people of either side of the political spectrum think you're a freak.
Anonymous No.17973475
>state forcibly presses men into military service during military crisis
>state can't forcibly press women into reproductive service during fertility crisis
Why is one power considered acceptable while the other is unthinkable?
Anonymous No.17973806
>>17971468 (OP)
GO BACK