>>17973798
That's because Athens is a massive melting pot of Greeks from all regions + hundreds of thousands of Albanians who identify as Greeks, and an equal number of Pontian Greeks with quite literally zero Slavic Y-DNA, dragging the percentage down.
>only had 20% Y-DNA of Slavic origin
You say that as if it's 20%, a fifth of Greece's biggest city's population, is a small number; it's still a large number, especially because Greece has exiled around more than 500K Slavs from Greece in the aftermath of the Balkan Wars, the Greek-Turkish War, and WW2.
>You check it
I did, they're exclusively Slavic, only islanders and Constantinople Greeks got the non-Slavic I2a mutation.
>Of I-P37
It is* a Slavic marker, because, surprise, surprise, the entirety of I-P37 is found in Slavic countries, and countries heavily affected by the expansion of Slavic Y-DNA, like Greece, Romania, Moldova, and Hungary.
>basal
No such thing today.
>but also Iranic R1a subclades
The only people with Z93 in Greece (Greek Thrace, specifically) are Greek Turks.
>So it can be safely said
It cannot.
>>17973811
If Slavs were a "cuck race", then 20-42% of Greeks wouldn't have Slavic Y-DNA in the mainland, and 45-50% of Romanians wouldn't have Slavic Y-DNA.
>Huge amounts of Uralic Y-DNA
Only Northeastern Russians have above-15% N1c1.
>>17973805
>Not all studies have the same weight.
The vast majority of studies done in the Greeks confirmed a dominance of Y-DNA compared to autDNA, just because they prove that the Slavic Y-DNA admixture is large doesn't make them shit.
>Are reduced to like 10-15% in the most Slavic regions
Most Slavic regions have at least one Slavic Y-DNA as a primary lineage, which disproves that argument.
