← Home ← Back to /his/

Thread 17976329

37 posts 6 images /his/
Anonymous No.17976329 >>17976339 >>17976358 >>17976370 >>17976373 >>17976407 >>17976429 >>17976468 >>17976530 >>17976540 >>17976589 >>17977017 >>17977150 >>17977495
Who was the most evil person who ever lived?
Anonymous No.17976337
Aleister Crowley.
Anonymous No.17976339
>>17976329 (OP)
Karl Popper and John Rawls are tied for first place.
Anonymous No.17976342
N*poleon
Anonymous No.17976358 >>17976421
>>17976329 (OP)
my stepdad. fuck you keith
Anonymous No.17976370
>>17976329 (OP)
Genghis Khan
Anonymous No.17976373
>>17976329 (OP)
Pol Pot
Anonymous No.17976375 >>17976523
balsack
Anonymous No.17976407 >>17976421
>>17976329 (OP)
Me
Anonymous No.17976421 >>17976433 >>17976848
>>17976358
Why are stepdads always so comically evil? You'd think if you became a stepdad you'd want to avoid that Dickensian stereotype, but I guess that deeply ingrained instinct to divert resources to your own biological offspring runs too deep.

>>17976407
not for long
Anonymous No.17976429
>>17976329 (OP)
Some degenerate serial killer or mass shooter seething home alone, lashing out killing some people, and than promptly getting killed by normal society. These are fully evil people, like let's say that Minnesota church shooter or Albert Fish, and they are less dangerous because it. They want to cause harm but they could never get motivated enough to become powerful.

It's misleading to call dictators and such the most evil. If they were just pure monsters full of malice, nobody would have liked them and they couldn't have achieved anything.
>but they tricked people into thinking they were nice
No, you don't get on top of a movement, than a country if you hate everyone and just want to cause harm. You have to be at least somewhat motived by good will towards some people you chose to represent, and you cannot be 100% evil.
Anonymous No.17976433
>>17976421
you think that's bad? my father married a spic because he was too pathetic to get a white woman and he doesn't consider me to be his son because I'm mixed race.

well I wonder whose fucking fault that could be..
Anonymous No.17976468 >>17976531
>>17976329 (OP)
Jesus Christ.
>Every one of Jesus’ apostles besides Peter was underage (neaniskos is the Greek word used)
>When a woman questions why he hangs out with kids he says “don’t scandalize me”
>Tells these boys he will make them “fishers of men”
>Goes into upper rooms and washes their feet while naked
>Tells them to “eat his flesh and drink his haima” (if you think this means “blood” here, see Ezekiel 23:20)
>Is arrested in a public park at 4am with a naked boy (see Mark 14:51-52)
>When the cops show up he says “why do you come for me with swords and clubs like I’m some kind of leistes”
>The word leistes, which gets translated as “thief” is actually “pirate” and was used in contemporary texts (many examples such as Lucian’s Alexander) to refer to sex traffickers
>Sex trafficking was a big problem in the Mediterranean and one of the big things the Romans did was crack down on the pedo pirates. Julius Caesar himself was kidnapped by them as a kid and afterwards had them all crucified
>Jesus Christ was in fact crucified between two other leistes
There's a reason Jesus's "Most Beloved Disciple" is always depicted as a beardless boy whereas the rest of his followers had beards. Dude liked em young.
Anonymous No.17976523
>>17976375
fax
Anonymous No.17976530 >>17976536
>>17976329 (OP)
On the contrary, he was an underrated master of rhetoric, literature, and philosophy. Almost none of his supposed crimes were ever proven, all that was confirmed was that he struck one of his maids one time (for which he was remorseful). This could be handwaved by his overindulgence in alcohol and likely PTSD from the war, though.
Anonymous No.17976531 >>17976535
>>17976468
>15-40 is underage
Post thrown out immediately
Anonymous No.17976535 >>17976538
>>17976531
You think it's okay to molest 15 year olds?
Anonymous No.17976536
>>17976530
Oh, he was convicted for debauchery a few times, but I ignored that because most modern people wouldn't consider that evil and many in 18th century France didn't either. In the Marseille affair his charge of attempted murder by poisoning and rape and sodomy get knocked down to debauchery, for example.

Him having sex with women before married was probably real.
Anonymous No.17976538 >>17976553 >>17976673
>>17976535
Even if any of his followers were 15 (cite the scripture on it), you also have to prove that he molested any of them (cite the scripture on it)

This is entirely your headcanon and not upheld by any theologian or biblical scholar. It's like calling Blackbeard a professional gay rapist because he was a "pirate" (slang term for gay dom) looking for "booty" (slang term for ass)
Anonymous No.17976540
>>17976329 (OP)
Women.
Anonymous No.17976553 >>17976584
>>17976538
I already provided scriptural evidence, you're just burying your head in the sand so as to continue worshipping a pedophile without cognitive dissonance
Anonymous No.17976584 >>17976654 >>17977155
>>17976553
You didn't, no. You said that because thief can also mean sex trafficker and Jesus's disciples all being young men, he MUST have been a gay child molester sex trafficker.

Again, blackboard had a ship of "young men" and "boys" and he was a pirate (slang term for gay man) Blackbeard MUST have been a gay pedophile and having sex with his entire crew.
Anonymous No.17976589
>>17976329 (OP)
Charles Taylor
Anonymous No.17976654 >>17976672
>>17976584
Keep telling yourself that while you continue to worship a deviant
Anonymous No.17976672 >>17976715
>>17976654
denounce the Quran.
Anonymous No.17976673
>>17976538
I'm completely willing to believe early modern pirates were gay rapists on account of their living circumstances and already immoral existence
Anonymous No.17976715 >>17976733
>>17976672
I denounce the Quran AND the Bible
Anonymous No.17976733 >>17976850 >>17977031
>>17976715
now lets see that talmud denounciation
Anonymous No.17976848
>>17976421
In nature the "stepdad" would just smash his new wife's children against the walls and make new children. It isn't natural to raise someone else's kids.
Anonymous No.17976850 >>17977031
>>17976733
Why? I have nothing against the Talmud.
Anonymous No.17977017
>>17976329 (OP)
Adolf Hitler. The damage his actions inflicted on Europe mark him as the most evil human being who ever lived. Second place is debatable, but I'd say Hegel, for much the same reason, just at a slightly less pressing scale. Third place is obviously Martin Luther, for exactly the same reasons.

What's wrong with Germany? Is it something in the water there?
Big Bongus !!9zfcclmmPlH No.17977031
>>17976733
Pretty sure there's no rule that says Jews can't say they deny the Talmud
>>17976850
You said you denounce the Bible, you automatically denounce the Talmud by extension since the Talmud is commentary on the Tanakh
Anonymous No.17977150
>>17976329 (OP)
Modern days politicians
Anonymous No.17977155
>>17976584
>Blackbeard MUST have been a gay pedophile and having sex with his entire crew.
The one in One Piece does that
Anonymous No.17977250
>Panzram explicitly denied having any remorse for any of his actions[48] and began his journal with the statement: "In my lifetime I have murdered 21 human beings, I have committed thousands of burglaries, robberies, larcenies, arsons and, last but not least, I have committed sodomy on more than 1,000 male human beings. For all these things I am not in the least bit sorry. I have no conscience so that does not worry me. I don’t believe in Man, God nor devil. I hate the whole damed human race including myself....I have no desire whatever to reform myself. My only desire is to reform other people who try to reform me. and I believe that the only way to reform people is to kill em. My motto is, Rob em all, Rape em all and Kill em all. I am very truly yours signed Cooper John II Carl Panzram "
Anonymous No.17977487
It might seriously be Mao Zedong. His 'Cultural Revolution' fucked up his entire country so hard.
Anonymous No.17977495
>>17976329 (OP)
(You)